Comments (40)
sorted by:
onetruephilosoraptor [S] 35 points ago +36 / -1

"New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has won a landslide victory in the country's general election. With most ballots tallied, Ms Ardern's centre-left Labour Party has won 49% of the vote and she is projected to win a rare outright parliamentary majority. The opposition centre-right National Party, currently on 27%, has admitted defeat in Saturday's poll. The vote was originally due to be in September, but was postponed by a month after a renewed Covid-19 outbreak."

Terrible news to see. New Zealanders actually voted in droves for this fascist cunt.

stanzololthrowaway 45 points ago +45 / -0

As sad as it is, its not surprising. When real fascism rears its head, people fall over themselves to support it.

I knew this was gonna happen the moment she postponed the election and people became desperate for just a whiff of her queefs.

onetruephilosoraptor [S] 40 points ago +40 / -0

Fascism succeeds easily these days in the world by coming in the form of feminists who pretend to be for equality.

Ricwulf 22 points ago +22 / -0

Fascism has always succeeded via promises of security and safety. One needs to merely read the speeches from Mussolini or Hitler to understand that they truly believed their plans were for the betterment of the people, and their speeches reflected that.

Fascism succeeds because there are legitimately good intentions behind it, regardless of how much atrocity it might ultimately justify.

Fascism, much like Communism and other authoritarian regimes, heavily rely upon the idea that the ends justify the means. Whether that means free helicopter rides, gas chambers, or mass violent protests, the end is all that matters, not realising that far more often than not, the means are what define the ends.

Gizortnik 5 points ago +5 / -0

National Socialism succeeded in Germany because it actually pretended to be a moderate political movement that rested as a 'third way' between Fascism and Communism, without the 'destabalizing forces and failed policies of liberalism'.

Ricwulf 2 points ago +2 / -0

via promises of security and safety.

The growth of the NatSocs couldn't have been possible without the step that first built the security and safety, and legitimately helped bring back Germany from a pretty shitty time, before continuing on into the fascistic legacy modern media focuses purely on (almost assuredly to avoid noticing the similarities with modern politics).

Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't disagree, sort of.

That NSDAP did pretend it was a "third way" and pretended to be a moderate faction. The German people (particularly the Prussians) had been ruled by Authoritarian regimes for hundreds of years, and had basically been living under what amounted to a military/imperial dictatorship for a good portion of their lives... but one that had repeatedly made early efforts to promote socialism. Hence why "state socialists" worked under Bismark and guided his decisions.

The Wiemar Republic was effectively a Fabian Socialist government that had nearly destroyed Germany, and then decided to reverse course on it's monetary policy and embrace economic liberalism in a literal desperate attempt to recover the economy. It was actually working fantastically, but this effectively represented an internal economic revolution against the government's policies, and it exposed the Germans with the harsh economic reality that the government couldn't just give them all these entitlement and social programs anymore. The technocratic majesty of pre-WW1 Germany had to die because it was killing Germany. However, no one in Germany wanted to believe that Socialism was the problem (to the extent that Socialists & Leftists declared that Fascist thinking had to be a mental illness, and was not the inevitable result of Socialism being applied in a practical manner).

The NSDAP promised both socialism, and beneficial racialism (what they called nationalism at the time), and a style of strong military-like leadership. This was effectively a 'centerist' platform from the German voters perspective at the time. And even then, they voted for Hindenburg anyway because the Germans still generally thought that Hitler seemed a bit nutty.

All that being said, Germany's economic recovery had already begun under the Weimar government, it just wasn't culturally what the Germans were expecting and economic freedom meant their old social program were, eh, kaput! The monetary system's failures hadn't been solved, and Hitler got the impression that the German economy was bound to collapse again if more liberalizing steps weren't taken... but this ran contrary to literally everything he believed and did. Instead, he basically vampirized the economy even harder, and decided to plunder the rest of Europe to keep and expand Nazi social programs (while inventing another fictitious fiat currency).

The NSDAP not only didn't improve the base of the economy, but their economic failure, combined with their socialist misunderstanding of economics, was the basis of the whole damned war. The dirty truth is, the media and their leftist allies would rather tell you that the Nazis saved Germany because it tacitly defends central economic planning, rather then admit that socialism doesn't work.

Classic Leftism: it is preferable to kill 55 million people than admit you were wrong.

Steampunk_Moustache 6 points ago +6 / -0

When real fascism rears its head, people fall over themselves to support it.

Because nothing gets the lizard brain excited like displays of authority.

TheRedThirst 2 points ago +2 / -0

whiff of her queefs.

judging from the bulge there wont be any of those...

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Skywise 11 points ago +11 / -0

Maybe - any discussion about voter fraud?

RX-0Unicorn 13 points ago +13 / -0

No voter fraud but plenty of sheep voted Labour since they are in government. Can't tell people who to vote for on election day, but you can for early voting up to 2 weeks prior.

Gizortnik 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'd never claim that a Fascist, Communist, Socialist won without fraud; because that's not how they work. They'd cheat for even small and irrelevant victories because they might be doing it for a practice run on something else.

That being said, I've talked to a few kiwis and they all basically said the same thing: the population of NZ think that she's making nationally renowned, and well respected.

christianknight 7 points ago +7 / -0


666sadfrogs 27 points ago +27 / -0

She got re-elected after her gun grabbing nonsense?

New Zealand is lost, if you live there and can leave it might be smart to do so.

Gizortnik 8 points ago +8 / -0

Kick them out of the Five Eyes. We can't let a Fascist government into the security apparatus.

lgbtqwtfbbq 25 points ago +25 / -0

Pitcairn Island is only 3000 miles away. Small island, population 50, 300 miles from any other civilization, and actively trying to recruit new members into the community.

Gizortnik 6 points ago +6 / -0

I suggest swimming for it before the famines hit.

realerfunction 17 points ago +17 / -0

sold you out to foreign invasion.

Eldourado 15 points ago +15 / -0

The West is in a collective collapse.

TheImpossible1 15 points ago +16 / -1

How long until the genocide starts?

"The male population must be reduced to 10% and power restored to women."

ApparentlyImAHeretic 7 points ago +7 / -0

Holy shit, is that a real quote?

Need source!

ZodShael 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's feminism 101. Look up "Agent Orange files" and see if you can still find anything about them.

TL:DR About 12 or so years ago someone infiltrated a feminist website where countless feminists posted on their private forum about what should be done with men. Mass genocide was up there. These were all prominent feminists who ended up being exposed.

TheImpossible1 10 points ago +10 / -0

Don't need to infiltrate now, they just post that right on Twitter, where enforcement will say it doesn't break the rules.

Daucus9 7 points ago +7 / -0

lol really?

I remember this was a plot point of one of Anne Rice's Interview With a Vampire books. The vampire queen was like "yeah genocide the men to just 10%" and everyone else was like "wtf that's retarded"

ZodShael 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes. Men would be genocided through forced castration in the town square, then killed later on. 10% would be kept around in labor camps sealed off from society so that women may go about their lives, and they'll be kept for breeding purposes. They would go on and on about their fantasies.

TheImpossible1 7 points ago +8 / -1

Ah, not from her. Sorry to disappoint.

Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

Give it a few years. As with he Nazis, you have to ease people into accepting mass murder. The Germans actually didn't tolerate it very well, so the Nazis genuinely had to hide it.

She'll probably do some testing with some racialist purges. Like a BLM march that burns down a Jewish community, just to see what the public's reaction will be.

TheImpossible1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait, you actually agree with me on this? Usually you say I'm crazy.

Gizortnik 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's because you are crazy when it comes to women. Consider it your massive ideological blind spot.

It's like an ethno-nationalist refusing to understand why social authoritarianism isn't a valid solution to defeating Leftists who are seeking power. Or how a socialist attacks corporations, but doesn't see the danger of Unions, nor how those Unions could benefit corporate power.

TheRedThirst 3 points ago +3 / -0

im surprised that still up on youtube hahaha

JuliasEbola00 9 points ago +9 / -0

The left has successfully managed to sell tyranny as a progressive value. I truly believe that westerners have never been so stupid, so lost, so without the core that once made them great. It's going to be an incredibly tough task to bring normality back to the westerns that have lost their way.

TheRedThirst 2 points ago +2 / -0

so lost, so without the core that once made them great

whether people like to admit it or not, this is what happens when you remove Religion from daily life, people will just make up their fucking own or the government will make one for them.

Gizortnik 8 points ago +8 / -0

Seriously, GTFO of New Zealand before she starts killing people... and she will start killing people. They can't fucking help themselves.

Kroog 7 points ago +7 / -0

She might well have lost if the election was in march. COVID gave her a huge boost if you look as the polling. Support recently started to drop off again, just not in time for the election. So unless she is blessed with more disasters she will have a harder time next election. She won't be able to photo-op her way to victory again but will have to actually point to some kind of achievement.

At least ACT went from 0.5% of the vote to 9%. And Winston Peters is paying the price for putting Jacinda in power.

Gizortnik 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's interesting that you think there will be another election.

If there is, it will be so fraudulent she or her party won't lose. On the other hand, she might just not have one. She'll probably use some excuse about how people haven't been vaccinated enough to exit mandatory quarantines, so the vote can't be held until everyone properly shelters in place and organized dissent stops.

Eldourado 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can someone make a resume of what she proposes and defends for the next years?

Kroog 11 points ago +11 / -0

I remember her saying that national was "an utter failure" because some children still lived in poverty. So she was going to fix it. However children are still living in poverty, nothing changed. So she is im her own words "an utter failure" Other than that she's "a woman! Girl power yea!" At least she isn't Chole Swarbrick I guess.