62
posted ago by rainingblood +62 / -0

https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ https://archive.is/wvh3F

"We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure..." Wait I thought this was about black people and not trying to destroy the traditional family. Know who does that? Totalitarian regimes who want kids killing their parents and their countrymen cough comrades turning on them..

"We dismantle the patriarchal practice.." Oh look. They are blaming men. Wonder who founded this movement? We will get to that in a second. These people do know that not having a father figure has been tried in the inner cities right? Why aren't they supporting black men instead of blaming them and burning down their businesses?

"We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender privilege ..". They want to destroy the very idea of heterosexuality.

"We engage comrades..." HAHAHAHA. I'm sure you do.

BLM has 3 founders. 2 of whom are "queer". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alicia_Garza Raised as Alicia Schwartz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrisse_Cullors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opal_Tometi

This was never about black people. It's about subversion and LBGT. Black people are nothing but a shield.

https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ https://archive.is/wvh3F "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure..." Wait I thought this was about black people and not trying to destroy the traditional family. Know who does that? Totalitarian regimes who want kids killing their parents and their countrymen *cough* comrades turning on them.. "We dismantle the patriarchal practice.." Oh look. They are blaming men. Wonder who founded this movement? We will get to that in a second. These people do know that not having a father figure has been tried in the inner cities right? Why aren't they supporting black men instead of blaming them and burning down their businesses? "We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender privilege ..". They want to destroy the very idea of heterosexuality. "We engage **comrades**..." HAHAHAHA. I'm sure you do. BLM has 3 founders. 2 of whom are "queer". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alicia_Garza Raised as Alicia Schwartz. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrisse_Cullors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opal_Tometi This was never about black people. It's about subversion and LBGT. Black people are nothing but a shield.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
35
JustHereForTheSalmon 35 points ago +35 / -0

The interesting thing is that black families that haven't bought into thug culture (as in, they do that whole nuclear family thing) generally turn out very successful. You don't have upstanding citizens getting gunned down by police in the US.

Having both parents, staying in school and out of trouble, and not having a child until you're married are the tickets to prosperity that anyone can grasp if they wanted.

7
exilde 7 points ago +7 / -0

Kind of depends on your yardstick for "very successful". Around 10% of blacks born into affluent households end up in prison at some point.

9
Adamrises 9 points ago +10 / -1

There is an argument to be made that the very existence of "thug culture" is behind that too. Simply because affluent kids love to rebel.

When Brayden the suburb kid rebels, he has to join pot smoking marxists who used to be harmless if stupid. When Traymichael rebels he joins a street gang, and ends up in the cycle anyway.

Something about it just draws them in even when they have none of the generic excuses to do so.

5
exilde 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem is that poor white kids only resort to behavior that results in prison time around 2.7% of the time. That's a pretty massive discrepancy. If the best conditions in the development of black kids produce results 4x worse than the worst conditions for white kids... well, it should at least make you go 'hmmm'.

There's the tired argument of black kids being arrested more than white kids due to systemic racism (which I really don't think you ascribe to), but all you have to do is look at homicide, a crime that is highly unlikely to show racial bias, and the idea that it's systemic bias falls apart.

3
Adamrises 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's the point I was getting at. There is a specific aspect of black lives, in this case I am putting forth the "thug culture", that makes them act criminally or worse regardless of factors that would normally decrease such results.

Something draws them to it that is not doing so for other groups, and that might be the root cause of all their problems.

3
exilde 3 points ago +3 / -0

The high distribution of the low functioning MAOA-2r variant, and its mechanical effects on breaking down hormones and neurotransmitters that amp people up and make them paranoid, violent, and impulsive, would be my guess.

4
SR388-SAX 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's a hypothesis, sure, but that's all it is.

5
Adamrises 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well yeah, that's why I said there is an argument to be made in favor of said theory. All we have are many different hypothesis because there are too many factors to properly nail down exact science.

5
Gizortnik 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's not interesting, it's obvious.

A beneficial culture can do wonders for basically anyone. It's the reason why New England protestants, imposing a protestant-work-ethic culture, came to the south and helped blacks achieve a literacy rate from nearly 0% (as required by law) to near 50 % after a few decades.

Black Rednecks have culturally appropriated Cracker Culture, it's been instilled in them by racialists that the worst aspects of a shitty white culture, are somehow uniquely black. Why? Because it's easier to control people when they are dependent, malleable, have a lack of agency, and are emotionally incontinent.

22
acp_k2win 22 points ago +22 / -0

we know blm is a bunch of commies

but here is the harder pill to swallow, so was the original "civil rights" movement - just they had much tighter control over their optics and the patience to keep the heat on the frog low

14
TentElephant 14 points ago +15 / -1

The Boston Massacre was the original Kent State, and the soldiers were justified. Don't mob armed soldiers and you won't get shot.

11
dunmer_say_the_nword 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep -- John Adams even defended them successfully in court.

4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

The British did a lot of terrible shit, and a bunch of shit that were clear and obvious violations of Colonial English rights...

... but the Boston Massacre wasn't one of them.

As for Kent State:

  • The Communist """""peace activists""""" tried to burn the ROTC building down with everyone inside. Casualties from the burning down of the building were zero because the cadets reacted quickly.
  • The Ohio National Guard's unit commanders were criminally incompetent and disorganized.
3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

copy-pasta in the thread already: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/HEufPFwb/x/c/16biw2aSdE

How they treated Barry Goldwater for opposing the creation of protected classes in Federal Law is alarmingly similar to what they are doing to Trump. Difference is that Barry never stood a chance against a media onslaught during a time when literally the only 3 television channels directly opposed him and claimed he was a racist psychopath. Every major newspaper in the country slandered him. Even MLK compared him to Adolf Hitler.

It's also alarming to note that almost the entire media eventually rescinded their claims about him after he had been a senator for so long. They publicly admitted that they felt bad about what they did to him.

3 decades after those apologies, and the DNC is literally repeating LBJ's propaganda from 1964. The exact same lines.

The corporatist Democratic establishment need to be called out for what they are, particularly Hillary: Johnsonian Democrats.

3
acp_k2win 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kennedy was the last real Democrat. Johnson and those who came after are authoritarian socialists who are continuing FDRs mission to destroy the spirit of America and reshape it into something closer to the Soviet Union that he admired so much.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kennedy was a blip. He was part of a relatively liberal ruling elite in an era which had already seen most of the elites move towards Fabian Socialism.

I can't imagine having to go back in time and try to explain to someone watching the 1960 election that Nixon was a Democratic Socialist, that Kennedy was a Liberal, and that FDR was a Socialist/Communist.

Oh, and that Ronald Reagan will be the primer example of a Conservative Republican.

"RONALD REAGAN?! THE ACTOR?!! *THE ONE WHO TESTIFIED FOR THE COMMUNISTS?"

I feel like being from 2020 gives us the power to mess with people in various points of time & space.

17
coke501 17 points ago +17 / -0

"We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure..."

Because destroying the family unit has turned out so well for the black community.

"We dismantle the patriarchal practice.."

I mean, it did wonders for black men, didn't it? Now the only way they get at least some kind of "respect" is if they can become an athlete, a rapper or a gangbanger. Two of which are very unlikely and the last has an average lifespan of what, 30 years?

We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender privilege ..

I sometimes wonder if the african american people, the most homophobic demography in the US, knows about this one.

16
TheImpossible1 16 points ago +19 / -3

Welcome to my thoughts from 3-4 months ago. BLM is a women's movement.

23
rainingblood [S] 23 points ago +23 / -0

Imagine supporting BLM as a black man or black athlete. The funny thing is the media spins this as them standing up for something, when in fact they are bending and selling out their fellow black man.

I live near metro Detroit. I have yet to see a black man that wasn't LBGT sport anything BLM. Yet somehow we get media stories about black families having their home sprayed with swastika's...Funny how it's always swastika's. They ran that story 3 days in a row on local news. I'm sure other cities are getting similar BS. You will never get the follow up of who did it though, because it will be posted at that fakehatecrimes site when people actually investigate it lol. The whole thing is a fraud.

As far as non LBGT that sport BLM merch I have seen? Mostly well off housewives from the nicer cities and their idiot teen daughters. Cities like Troy, Grosse Point, Rochester.

7
grinnin_barrett 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's always swastikas because of the people in media.

3
Soup_Navy_Admiral 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's always swastikas because of the people in media.

Except when it's random cross-shaped street construction markings, because of the people in media.

3
grinnin_barrett 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right. Exactly what I said.

13
neopowerave 13 points ago +13 / -0 (edited)

Reminder: BLM is funded by Soros who is funded by none other than the Rothschilds. It's identity politics. It's the age-old divide and conquer tactic used by the parasitic "ruling" class. That's what BLM is for: to sow division among the public, because as the old saying goes: united we stand divided we fall.

8
SemperVenari 8 points ago +8 / -0

mothers, parents, and children

Can't even bring themselves to say "fathers". I mean I know they're not likely to be around in the black community in the first place, but still...

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

This was never about black people. It's about subversion and LBGT. Black people are nothing but a shield.

Of course it wasn't. It's not even about LGBT. It's only about Subversion.

It was always social engineering for division.

I'm Julia Brown. For 9 years I was a member of the Communist Party, serving as an undercover agent for the FBI. During that time, I learned that the Communist conspiracy had been planning and working for years to bring violent revolution to America. It was to be a Communist revolution, but the great majority of the American people would not be allowed to realize that until it had already happened. If all goes according to the Communist blueprint, Americans will believe that the chaos and violence has something to do with Civil Rights. Our enemies were quick to find our weakest point of their attack. They knew that racial differences could provide them with an excellent wedge to divide our people. Their strategy, simply, has been to keep hammering on that wedge. To drive it deeper into our social structure. To open all wounds that have since healed, and deliberately to create new ones wherever they can.

...

Now this doesn't mean that there isn't a legitimate need for the advancement of Civil Rights for many of our negro citizens. Of course there is a need there. Otherwise, Communist agitators, posing as Civil Rights leaders, could never hope to enlist massive support for their schemes. The aspirations for Negros for full equality were not created by Communists, but they are used by Communists in such a way that idealistic Americans of all races can be tricked into implementing the Communist blueprint for revolution.

Having been on the inside of the Communist Party, it's easy for me to recognize this revolutionary agitation in disguise. But, the average American finds it hard to believe that something as worthy and noble sounding as a Civil Rights movement could possibly be a Communist maneuver.

  • "Anarchy USA", John Birch Society, 1965
2
spezpedobestfriend 2 points ago +2 / -0

Notice on their shitpost, they mention "man" once and it is in a negative connotation for cis gender.

I use this site when talking to people supporting BLM and tell them its a marxist and trans organization that is actively working against black men. You can derive from that diatribe that black men will be sperm donors and nothing more in their ideal world.