Comments (6)
sorted by:
TentElephant 29 points ago +29 / -0 (edited)

This is a real concern. Obama overhauled the officer corps with SJWs and inclusion shit. They didn't go away just because Trump told the deep state to slow down the indoctrination.

ShamTheater [S] 26 points ago +26 / -0

Biden and Gore envision a scenario where Trump clearly loses the 2020 election and then throws a temper tantrum and refuses to leave the White House. Such a scenario is an absurdity.It is far more plausible that the 2020 election will be hotly contested, and Democratic leaders will simply declare victory, and then turn to the press and big tech to endorse their claims. Then, they will turn to the military to enforce what they have decided. It is also possible that, in a contested election, Democrats will order their “peaceful protesters” to invade and menace the capital. If President Trump orders the use of force to maintain order, the establishment will seize upon this as an excuse for the military to revolt against him.

666sadfrogs 25 points ago +25 / -0

If it wasn’t for recent months, I would dismiss this as bad concern bait. Something is going to happen after the 3rd and whatever it is, it’s not going to be pretty. They put this idea into people’s heads that Trump is not going to step down if he loses, whenever we know the White House is taking the steps to make the transition.

We know that they want to delay the results of the election, potentially to cheat and get Biden in “legitimately” but I wouldn’t put them past it to just lie to the people and say Biden won anyways. This election is a threat to our country, but not the way the left is claiming it is. If this goes down the way that it looks like it will, there will be no more elections, at least not as a fully preserved Union.

Throwawaycuzmeh 21 points ago +21 / -0

I've learned more about the 1860 election in the last few weeks than I did in my combined 30+ previous years on this planet, and not for complete lack of trying. Turns out the democrats of today are behaving almost exactly like the democrats of Lincoln's era.

almond_activator 10 points ago +10 / -0

Their strategic position is considerably worse today than it was then. Cut off the cities from resources produced in the non-Communist, non-Socialist, non-Subversive areas of the country and you'll be Commie-free faster than you can say 'Mi Presidente Augusto Pinochet'.

LaptopWillEatThisAcc 4 points ago +4 / -0

Would you care to share what you've learned with the rest of the class? Were there huge riots and terrorism/intimidation like what America's facing right now back then, too? The worst I read, aside from the secession, was that Democrat delegates walked out of their own conventions when they couldn't get support for slavery... but considering that site also said the Dems "should have been the party of unity", I have my doubts that this source is telling the whole story.