im a rather convinced poliamorist. meaning conceptually i believe it to be the superior intimacy form. (one might add relationship anarchy as the ultimate standard - total flexibility)
i saw that kia2 was mostly opposing this? how come ?
my logic is simple. we want whats best for our partners > 0 restrictions
our needs and contexts vary wildly > maximum flexibility
the ultimate does not feel > is not controlled by jealousy and other possesive feels
fyi im asexual > graysexual .. rarely feel sexual attraction and i only have 1 partner. but have been studying this for a 7-10 years.
We only care if a mod goes off the rails and hands out bans for not agreeing with you on polyamory.
Other than that we literally do not give a shit how you live your life so long as you extend us the same courtesy.
well not giving a shit sounds a bit exxagerated. what about pedophilia?
why not explore the conflict conceptually to understand exactly where the harm is . if any. i mean sure, its hardly the rosy context to discuss such things. im also promoting traditional values for the time being till the cultural value system gets a bit more fit for challenges
Not a comparison you probably want to make?