Well the key factor in this principle is liability. 'Protect and Serve' is just market branding. It's already been legally established that US cops are not under obligation to protect anyone in the general populace (and the same principle probably applies everywhere across our neolib anarcho-tyranny). Since cops are the armed enforcers of the local economic zone managers, their main interest is simply avoiding liability, so our system can happily say that cops have no responsibility whatsoever for their countrymen or local citizenry, but they do assume heavy liability for any damage to the brown goods they are shipping.
If the cops are not under obligation to protect anyone in the general population, why is everyone in the general population under obligation to pay taxes for the cops' salaries?
Good question. The answer of the police/courts is probably that they protect the public at large by protecting the system of law, but that takes the form of mere apprehension of perps after the fact. They don't have to physically stick their neck out to protect anyone, see eg. Uvalde cops cleared of wrongdoing for standing by while an active shooter went around executing kids.
The legal system is happy with this because law and procedure have been decoupled from any moral framework, freeing up the cops to act as low liability armed guards for #currentthing.
Also, this right after that black dude fucking murders a random retired sheriff because some other unrelated cop killed his thug of a son...it's really something. And at least parts of the Black Community rallying around that piece of shit.
That fucker is some sort of vigilante hero, meanwhile this dude gets shot by the police for going after the dude who actually was responsible for killing his grandchildren.
I will say...as sad as this is, you can't blame the police for returning fire on a gunman. But that also doesn't change how broken our justice system is, either. I don't know the full story, but I can't blame the cops here...but I can absolutely blame our justice system.
If anything, this is just a lesson that, if you're going to do this thing - which you totally shouldn't - plan well.
Don't put yourself in positions where police get to shoot your ass. They have the advantage of numbers and generally firepower, and will drop your ass.
Also, this right after that black dude fucking murders a random retired sheriff because some other unrelated cop killed his thug of a son...it's really something. And at least parts of the Black Community rallying around that piece of shit. That fucker is some sort of vigilante hero, meanwhile this dude gets shot by the police for going after the dude who actually was responsible for killing his grandchildren
Yeah, it's as if trying to murder people isn't something we should tolerate. It's as if the black guy and the white guy are crazy murderers, who wanted to kill anyone that stood in their way from getting blood.
There's no fucking justice in any of this, and it's fucking retarded that anyone can look at both of these situations and think either one of them was ever in the right.
That would be a great point, if I'd said anything close to the contrary. Go argue with the one or two retards actually making the point which you, for some reason, seem to think I'm making...
This should not even be a philosophically controversial statement. The entire concept of national justice arose to stop families and small communities exacting justice themselves. One family might take vengeance on another, and vice versa, and you get generational blood feuds which work to the detriment of everyone. When the families involved were all homogeneous countrymen, rather than whites vs generations of imported economic units, it made sense to have a system that stopped this from escalating.
When the system warps itself to routinely pervert justice of its own accord, it becomes just as much your enemy - far moreso even - than the criminals it's supposedly judging.
When the system warps itself to routinely pervert justice of its own accord, it becomes just as much your enemy
There were only 25 executions last year. There were something like 21000 homicides. Those two numbers should have nearly the same order of magnitude. The government has abdicated its responsibilities. Thus, it becomes the individual's responsibility again.
I've been saying that for years. Make trees and rope great again. Once a few nogs are seen swinging, just maybe they will learn to start behaving again. Doubt.
False. The police and justice system exist to prevent the generational blood feuds that were once common. By having a supposedly neutral 3rd party handle the process you'd cut down on revenge killings and disorder
The first full-time professional police force in the US was the NYPD, and they were created to beat the shit out of rioters. If the police ever helped anyone, it was by sheer accident.
So the nigger was literally in the process of facing justice when the guy decided to an hero. Now the nigger gets sympathy and the guy is dead. Great plan.
i for one, am totally on board for the complete and utter niggerization & feminization of the FBI
I'd rather abolish the FBI than let it be run by affirmative action hires. It might take talent and effort to find actual criminals, but it takes no talent at all to just use it to destroy the lives of honest white men or cook the books on racial crime statistics to try to hide the reality of black on white violence.
According to the Supreme Court, because he is in police custody the cops have a greater obligation to protect the prisoner than any nearby citizenry.
Absolute nonsense.
We fucking kicked off this country for less shit than this.
Well the key factor in this principle is liability. 'Protect and Serve' is just market branding. It's already been legally established that US cops are not under obligation to protect anyone in the general populace (and the same principle probably applies everywhere across our neolib anarcho-tyranny). Since cops are the armed enforcers of the local economic zone managers, their main interest is simply avoiding liability, so our system can happily say that cops have no responsibility whatsoever for their countrymen or local citizenry, but they do assume heavy liability for any damage to the brown goods they are shipping.
If the cops are not under obligation to protect anyone in the general population, why is everyone in the general population under obligation to pay taxes for the cops' salaries?
Good question. The answer of the police/courts is probably that they protect the public at large by protecting the system of law, but that takes the form of mere apprehension of perps after the fact. They don't have to physically stick their neck out to protect anyone, see eg. Uvalde cops cleared of wrongdoing for standing by while an active shooter went around executing kids.
The legal system is happy with this because law and procedure have been decoupled from any moral framework, freeing up the cops to act as low liability armed guards for #currentthing.
Because they can oppress and you can't.
“ @nypost your framing here is disgusting. You use slaughter to describe Mr. Vawter's intent but merely killing to describe what Pettis did.
We don't hate journalists enough.”
Gazuntite.
Also, this right after that black dude fucking murders a random retired sheriff because some other unrelated cop killed his thug of a son...it's really something. And at least parts of the Black Community rallying around that piece of shit.
That fucker is some sort of vigilante hero, meanwhile this dude gets shot by the police for going after the dude who actually was responsible for killing his grandchildren.
I will say...as sad as this is, you can't blame the police for returning fire on a gunman. But that also doesn't change how broken our justice system is, either. I don't know the full story, but I can't blame the cops here...but I can absolutely blame our justice system.
If anything, this is just a lesson that, if you're going to do this thing - which you totally shouldn't - plan well.
Don't put yourself in positions where police get to shoot your ass. They have the advantage of numbers and generally firepower, and will drop your ass.
Yeah, it's as if trying to murder people isn't something we should tolerate. It's as if the black guy and the white guy are crazy murderers, who wanted to kill anyone that stood in their way from getting blood.
There's no fucking justice in any of this, and it's fucking retarded that anyone can look at both of these situations and think either one of them was ever in the right.
That would be a great point, if I'd said anything close to the contrary. Go argue with the one or two retards actually making the point which you, for some reason, seem to think I'm making...
This should not even be a philosophically controversial statement. The entire concept of national justice arose to stop families and small communities exacting justice themselves. One family might take vengeance on another, and vice versa, and you get generational blood feuds which work to the detriment of everyone. When the families involved were all homogeneous countrymen, rather than whites vs generations of imported economic units, it made sense to have a system that stopped this from escalating.
When the system warps itself to routinely pervert justice of its own accord, it becomes just as much your enemy - far moreso even - than the criminals it's supposedly judging.
There were only 25 executions last year. There were something like 21000 homicides. Those two numbers should have nearly the same order of magnitude. The government has abdicated its responsibilities. Thus, it becomes the individual's responsibility again.
I've been saying that for years. Make trees and rope great again. Once a few nogs are seen swinging, just maybe they will learn to start behaving again. Doubt.
False. The police and justice system exist to prevent the generational blood feuds that were once common. By having a supposedly neutral 3rd party handle the process you'd cut down on revenge killings and disorder
The apostrophe d saves this post. It's a conditional 'would' describing conditions we are not living under.
Well yes the justice system has never lived up to the ideal and I will certainly say it has gotten out of hand
The first full-time professional police force in the US was the NYPD, and they were created to beat the shit out of rioters. If the police ever helped anyone, it was by sheer accident.
Because they're the security forces of our occupation government. Courts, police and "the law" exist to protect them, not you.
Britain is just the most egregious example.
Post Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Post Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Do not call reprisal killings "true justice"
So the nigger was literally in the process of facing justice when the guy decided to an hero. Now the nigger gets sympathy and the guy is dead. Great plan.
You faggots literally just complained about a black guy doing literally this 2 days ago.
You do not get to murder random people because someone else committed a murder.
You do not get to assassinate people in police custody.
Eh. Without the police, media, government, subversive foreign influences, and more, whites my have maintained control.
We had more than just the police sicced on us, over the last X decades.
Sure, but all those other parts of the system rely on the police to impose their will on us and to protect them from us.
I'd rather abolish the FBI than let it be run by affirmative action hires. It might take talent and effort to find actual criminals, but it takes no talent at all to just use it to destroy the lives of honest white men or cook the books on racial crime statistics to try to hide the reality of black on white violence.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Do not assert the innate moral inferiority of races
What makes you think they understand consequence or gratitude?
Hispanics have been purging niggers from their areas for years. We need to do the same.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks