Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

47
So, what's Texas Bill 366? Cause this is what Lefties are saying it is (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 1 year ago by AlfredicEnglishRules 1 year ago by AlfredicEnglishRules +47 / -0
14 comments download share
14 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (14)
sorted by:
▲ 31 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 31 points 1 year ago +31 / -0

top results: https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB366/id/3197809

A person may not, with the intent to influence an election, knowingly cause to be published, distributed, or broadcast political advertising that includes an image, audio recording, or video recording of an officeholder's or candidate's appearance, speech, or conduct that did not occur in reality

they're freaking out that lying will be illegal, especially with ai generated video.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

Yes it's more about AI image generation than some cartoon memes. Both sides seem to be up in arms about it after reading only the headline. That being said I'm sure it'll be abused eventually

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

At which point we can once again say "Simpsons did it first",

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKfMpzpF6Hk&t=89s

But then similar things even with just shading and tone have already been done.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

with the intent to influence an election

So they're just straight-up admitting it, then, if this "infringes" on their totally neutral innocent comedy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– CarmenOfSandiego 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Ah but you see, "Orange man bad", therefore the propaganda Message message can show him being bad. Checkmate, Trumfers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PM-Melania-feet-pics 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Much as I hate that smug cunt Colbert now, he nailed it with "Truthiness"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– simian 23 points 1 year ago +23 / -0

As usual, lefties are retarded. The bill requires the disclosure of the use of AI-generated or altered images/audio/video in political ads. So unless the theoretical “political cartoon” is an official party or candidate advert, in which case it’s not really a political cartoon, AND was using AI-generated material, AND was not properly disclosed as such, I don’t think it would be a problem. It’s especially funny to see such hand-wringing from the party which, under Biden, was VERY big on “combatting mis/dis-information.”

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Ahaus667 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

Reverse Hanlons razor. They intentionally misconstrue everything to sell it as fascism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Mpetey123 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

The Texas House of Representatives approved a bill Wednesday requiring political advertisements to include disclosures if the image, audio, or video recording used were substantially altered.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules [S] 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Thank you. I knew it wasn't what they said, but didn't know which direction.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Mpetey123 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

My quick Googling tells me the "far right" Republicans are the ones opposing it. I'm surprised your leftie friends sent it to you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I'm sure. That's why I didn't do a Google.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– simian 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I noticed that, too, when I was preparing my response. It’s very heartening, and points toward the bigger issue with the Democrat/Republican divide I’ve noticed. Republicans are largely principles-based. So, yeah, if they see one of their own proposing something that goes against the party’s general principles (smaller government, upholding rights, etc.) they’ll turn on them. Democrats are much more ad-hoc in their beliefs so the they’ll mindlessly adopt positions regardless of whether they contradict each other and not even notice because unity is more important than sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– bloodguard 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

It's yet another misuse of the word "Fascist" but I agree with the sentiment. This is weak sauce bullshit trying to regulate AI generated images and video. Just points up that most of the GOP are techno-tard pants wetting ponces just like the DNC.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy