A person may not, with the intent to influence an election, knowingly cause to be published, distributed, or broadcast political advertising that includes an image, audio recording, or video recording of an officeholder's or candidate's appearance, speech, or conduct that did not occur in reality
they're freaking out that lying will be illegal, especially with ai generated video.
Yes it's more about AI image generation than some cartoon memes. Both sides seem to be up in arms about it after reading only the headline. That being said I'm sure it'll be abused eventually
As usual, lefties are retarded. The bill requires the disclosure of the use of AI-generated or altered images/audio/video in political ads. So unless the theoretical “political cartoon” is an official party or candidate advert, in which case it’s not really a political cartoon, AND was using AI-generated material, AND was not properly disclosed as such, I don’t think it would be a problem.
It’s especially funny to see such hand-wringing from the party which, under Biden, was VERY big on “combatting mis/dis-information.”
The Texas House of Representatives approved a bill Wednesday requiring political advertisements to include disclosures if the image, audio, or video recording used were substantially altered.
I noticed that, too, when I was preparing my response. It’s very heartening, and points toward the bigger issue with the Democrat/Republican divide I’ve noticed. Republicans are largely principles-based. So, yeah, if they see one of their own proposing something that goes against the party’s general principles (smaller government, upholding rights, etc.) they’ll turn on them. Democrats are much more ad-hoc in their beliefs so the they’ll mindlessly adopt positions regardless of whether they contradict each other and not even notice because unity is more important than sense.
It's yet another misuse of the word "Fascist" but I agree with the sentiment. This is weak sauce bullshit trying to regulate AI generated images and video. Just points up that most of the GOP are techno-tard pants wetting ponces just like the DNC.
top results: https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB366/id/3197809
they're freaking out that lying will be illegal, especially with ai generated video.
Yes it's more about AI image generation than some cartoon memes. Both sides seem to be up in arms about it after reading only the headline. That being said I'm sure it'll be abused eventually
At which point we can once again say "Simpsons did it first",
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKfMpzpF6Hk&t=89s
But then similar things even with just shading and tone have already been done.
So they're just straight-up admitting it, then, if this "infringes" on their totally neutral innocent comedy.
Ah but you see, "Orange man bad", therefore the
propagandaMessagemessage can show him being bad. Checkmate, Trumfers.Much as I hate that smug cunt Colbert now, he nailed it with "Truthiness"
As usual, lefties are retarded. The bill requires the disclosure of the use of AI-generated or altered images/audio/video in political ads. So unless the theoretical “political cartoon” is an official party or candidate advert, in which case it’s not really a political cartoon, AND was using AI-generated material, AND was not properly disclosed as such, I don’t think it would be a problem. It’s especially funny to see such hand-wringing from the party which, under Biden, was VERY big on “combatting mis/dis-information.”
Reverse Hanlons razor. They intentionally misconstrue everything to sell it as fascism.
The Texas House of Representatives approved a bill Wednesday requiring political advertisements to include disclosures if the image, audio, or video recording used were substantially altered.
Thank you. I knew it wasn't what they said, but didn't know which direction.
My quick Googling tells me the "far right" Republicans are the ones opposing it. I'm surprised your leftie friends sent it to you.
I'm sure. That's why I didn't do a Google.
I noticed that, too, when I was preparing my response. It’s very heartening, and points toward the bigger issue with the Democrat/Republican divide I’ve noticed. Republicans are largely principles-based. So, yeah, if they see one of their own proposing something that goes against the party’s general principles (smaller government, upholding rights, etc.) they’ll turn on them. Democrats are much more ad-hoc in their beliefs so the they’ll mindlessly adopt positions regardless of whether they contradict each other and not even notice because unity is more important than sense.
It's yet another misuse of the word "Fascist" but I agree with the sentiment. This is weak sauce bullshit trying to regulate AI generated images and video. Just points up that most of the GOP are techno-tard pants wetting ponces just like the DNC.