"History for me, not for thee." - Ben Shapiro
(twitter.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
There's your source, Antonio. Looking forward to see the twists and turns of your reply.
I don't really like all the callouts...but what did he do this time?
Just the typical shuck-and-jive of a coper adhering staunchly to calculated ignorance.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/19Ae8ZdJnH/x/c/4eRT0rou8qy
To be fair, asking for a source there is good practice, even if done for defensive reasons.
Also, that clip you linked is brutal. From right before the USS Liberty part:
Ahahaha, he's so deep he got it backward.
Strange, Ben, since you've openly said the opposite numerous times, sometimes openly, sometimes implied. And that the reason to support America is because it's good for Israel.
From a Zionist perspective, the whole existence of America, much less if something is good or bad for America, is to assist Israel.
Technically speaking you are correct and I should have sourced my comment. Practically speaking I'm lazy and everyone already knows all about Ben. Trollingly speaking I'm mostly just giving our beloved heeb mascot some shit.
I feel like sourcing that Ben Shapiro doesn’t think the USS Liberty was a big deal is a bit like sourcing that President Trump wants to build a wall.
It's good to source all of your information, but we're up against censorious manipulative liars, who will quash all dissent and contrary information. Even archiving websites sometimes doesn't work, as they're removed for wrongthink.
And, when debating someone who is acting in bad faith, they use "source?!" as a cudgel and deflection, forcing you to jump through and endless parade of hoops, and adhering to the most stringent of rules, that they never, ever apply to their own position. Even when the things you're stating are plainly obvious truths and simple logic, they're decry "SOURCE?!", not as a means to truth, but with malicious intent. When debating such a person, you could cite every single claim you make a hundred fold, they would reject all of it, and proudly declare themselves the winner.
👌🤣
23 hours later, jewOfMoscow and Giz are nowhere to be seen, give their handlers a bit more to figure it out.
Well here's the thing, Ben. It's not so much about who killed JFK or why specifically the USS Liberty was destroyed by our greatest ally.
It's about whether or not the forces behind those events are still relevant today, which they almost certainly are, because you don't get into positions of power to pull that shit off and then just disappear without a fight.
Also: I guess we can forget about the concentration camps, right? It's not like they're relevant today.
I saw it put well in the comments of one of the tweets about this, paraphrasing:
If they're hiding the information about who killed JFK still, it's because the conspirators or their successors are still in power. The very fact that they're hiding anything related to it is itself telling.
I wonder how much Henry Kissinger had his slimy tentacles on the JFK assassination or the fallout afterwards.
Even if he wasn't involved, he was never one to let a good crisis go to waste.
What did he say to his plastic surgeon?
"Make me look like a hebrew george michael?"
🤣
Should have used him talking about the holocaust in the bottom clip, because the timeframe is more in sync (with the important events that actually happened as described in the other two clips) and because holocaust atrocity propaganda is more sensationally jewish, a cornerstone of white-facing propaganda. Would work better for pointing out the conflict of interest.