I'm sure they're just watching something else, although I'm not sure what he's trying to accomplish telling everyone they're watching Judgment at Nuremberg. Just the standard Jewish schtick of wallowing in Holocaust victimhood?
The Nuremberg tribunals have always bothered me because they are championed as a "triumph of justice", but they were mostly ex post facto crimes invented for the trials. There simply was no concept of "crimes against humanity" or "waging an aggressive war" as a distinctly criminal act prior to this. They also didn't afford the defendants most of the rights somebody being prosecuted in the US would enjoy. I'm not sure how convicting someone at a trial that wouldn't be legal under your own laws can be championed as a Triumph of Justice.
They were simply the allies slapping on a veneer of legality while engaging in the standard age-old practice of executing or jailing the leaders of the losing nation after a war.
I'm sure they're just watching something else, although I'm not sure what he's trying to accomplish telling everyone they're watching Judgment at Nuremberg. Just the standard Jewish schtick of wallowing in Holocaust victimhood?
The Nuremberg tribunals have always bothered me because they are championed as a "triumph of justice", but they were mostly ex post facto crimes invented for the trials. There simply was no concept of "crimes against humanity" or "waging an aggressive war" as a distinctly criminal act prior to this. They also didn't afford the defendants most of the rights somebody being prosecuted in the US would enjoy. I'm not sure how convicting someone at a trial that wouldn't be legal under your own laws can be championed as a Triumph of Justice.
They were simply the allies slapping on a veneer of legality while engaging in the standard age-old practice of executing or jailing the leaders of the losing nation after a war.
The proof that it's not real: they claim to love the Nuremberg Trial, but also loved mandates for untested gene therapies.