Only the first one is a legitimate criticism. If you ask Google AI about a word invented to describe the Holocaust and expect it to not mention the Holocaust, you're an idiot. The problem with the second one is claiming the colonisation of North America was a genocide.
i asked it to define "genocide" i didn't ask it to define "holocaust". Believe it or not the holocaust isn't the only "genocide" out there . My point is that the AI seems to want to push the "jews are victims " narratives so of course that's what they always focus on .
Read your own screenshot. The word "genocide" was invented to describe the Holocaust. The Holocaust is not the only genocide, but previous genocides were not called "genocide" by contemporary sources.
Only the first one is a legitimate criticism. If you ask Google AI about a word invented to describe the Holocaust and expect it to not mention the Holocaust, you're an idiot. The problem with the second one is claiming the colonisation of North America was a genocide.
i asked it to define "genocide" i didn't ask it to define "holocaust". Believe it or not the holocaust isn't the only "genocide" out there . My point is that the AI seems to want to push the "jews are victims " narratives so of course that's what they always focus on .
Read your own screenshot. The word "genocide" was invented to describe the Holocaust. The Holocaust is not the only genocide, but previous genocides were not called "genocide" by contemporary sources.
well maybe we should stop using words that were invented by jewish activists looking to play victim.
Honestly Grumman is right on this one. There are plenty of other good examples of Google AI being biased, but you're really reaching here.