Vtubers vs. Thots
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
They tell you they're because they're depictions of children.
No, they aren't. In manga and anime, there is often a clear difference between child-age, teenage and adult characters. Yes, there are some child-like v-tubers out there called lolis but not all of them are. Also, I think most people have been brainwashed to think that it is immoral to feel sexual attraction to members of the opposite sex if the government has determined they're under a certain age, regardless of natural evidence pointing to the fact that such members are already capable of producing offspring.
Furthermore, the anime or manga subgenre known as lolicon is a niche segment that doesn't appeal to everyone, and which actually depicts character that are often adults or older than they look within the context of the story and their respective, fictitious world.
Plenty of legal scenarios treat human beings under 18 years of age as "children", which is nonsense. I'm just trying to be frank and objective here, not trying to defend real, sexual degeneracy.
I'm not attacking anime as a whole. Just the disgusting pedo stuff that is being defended by OP.
There is a tremendous gulf between being attracted to a child or someone just entering puberty, who technically could produce offspring, and being attracted to someone who has completed puberty but isn't of legal age.
The first example describes a sick person that needs to be purged from the world.
The second is an example of someone that would be normal in any other time in history, but all things considered really should reevaluate themselves and why they aren't disgusted by being around someone that still acts like they're a child.