56
posted ago by SpaceGeneral ago by SpaceGeneral +56 / -0

Disney, Soyny, EA, Ubisoft, M$, etc. Pick your major company that has gone woke and ended up losing hundreds of millions on various gay and brown boondoggles.

A company is made up of various levels from the mail room intern to the Board of Directors, CEO, and so on. My question is, is there a disconnect in some of these companies between the people pushing wokism and the ones making the big company defining positions, and if so, where? We know that many of the same people sit on the Board for multiple big companies at once. Someone can be on the Board of Directors for Exxon, Walmart, Disney, etc all at the same time. How often are these obscenely rich and usually very old people actually paying attention to how well their company runs and whether or not their plans are planning out? Are many of them simply spending most of their time golfing and schmoozing and enjoying being rich while getting a briefing from underlings a few times a year? These underlings being the ones who keep telling them "trust us, leftism is the way of the future. Look at all of the metrics from Twitter, Reddit, etc. Look at all of these articles from Vanity Fair, IGN, Hollywood Reporter, etc. Losing 420 million on that last project was just a fluke caused by bad actors who are the minority, trust us, it'll work" and these old rich people being totally disconnected from their own markets have no idea what they average normal people want, so they just follow advice from all the communists who have weaseled their way into mid level advisory positions. Or are even the people at the very top fully aware that their market hates what they're selling and they want to cram it down their throats anyways? I am fully convinced that Bill Gates wants to murder hundreds of millions of people. I am fully convinced Kathleen Kennedy hates men and is gleefully tearing down things she knows men enjoyed on purpose. But are they all like that? If you could spend 10 minutes alone with the top decision makers at CDPR, Ubisoft, Warner Brothers, etc, and you could make the case that like 95% of their paying customers hate what they're doing and want to but good products again, would that decision makers know you're telling the truth but keep on destroying their companies in an attempt to poison the things you like on purpose, or would they be shocked and in disbelief as this is the first time anyone has actually told them what their market wants? Are they insulated and oblivious old rich people who are being manipulated by their advisors, or are they willingly complicit?