Fridman is a good case against the growth mindset; the only reason I know this dude is an MIT prof is because there are old MIT OpenCourseWare videos with him as the professor. Dude's ideas are about as penetrating as a pool noodle piercing Hoover Dam. Presumably he spent a lot of time reading and learning but after all of that he'a still a midwit?
Lecturer I believe. As I understand it, and I'll fully admit my understanding is quite poor, you need to have a Master's Degree to teach at a university and a doctorate to actually be a professor.
In his partial defense, I don't think he's that bad of an interviewer, and his guests are quite varied - Joe Rogan said that he would NOT invite Trump. I chuckle when I hear people describe him as smart, but that may just be because he's so uncharismatic and because he doesn't speak well - I doubt I could earn a a technical MSc at any university, let alone MIT.
I didn’t know this, but it makes a lot of sense to me now. He’s one of those over educated stupid people. That whole thing about book smarts and street smarts. Some of the smartest people I’ve known in my lifetime have tattoos and drive tow trucks, some of the biggest dumbfucks I’ve known have 3 framed degrees on their office wall and a couple of letters after their name.
I’ve honestly never been able to sit through a full episode of Lex, no matter WHO he’s interviewing. Guy is practically dead behind the wheel, and his questions are so 2015 normie it’s painful (eg “do you think the mainstream media may REALLY BE biased?”)
It’s also hard to take him seriously when he looks like Robert Deniro fucked Mr Bean.
Trump sounded a bit low-energy and he misjudged his audience several times, like the 'millions of deaths' suggestion. He should have just said, 'affected'. Millions were affected.
The campaigning is maybe taking its toll or he's trying to play it more low-key. Needless to say, Obamala is in no way an alternative.
I mean, not to compare the two, but he's almost as old as Biden. You could already see the decline in his speech compared to how extraordinarily well-spoken he was in the early 1990s.
After 9 years of ceaseless attacks, fake investigations, indictments and now two assassination attempts, you'd have to be a man of steel to not be affected. The wonder is that he has endured so long.
Fridman is a good case against the growth mindset; the only reason I know this dude is an MIT prof is because there are old MIT OpenCourseWare videos with him as the professor. Dude's ideas are about as penetrating as a pool noodle piercing Hoover Dam. Presumably he spent a lot of time reading and learning but after all of that he'a still a midwit?
Lecturer I believe. As I understand it, and I'll fully admit my understanding is quite poor, you need to have a Master's Degree to teach at a university and a doctorate to actually be a professor.
In his partial defense, I don't think he's that bad of an interviewer, and his guests are quite varied - Joe Rogan said that he would NOT invite Trump. I chuckle when I hear people describe him as smart, but that may just be because he's so uncharismatic and because he doesn't speak well - I doubt I could earn a a technical MSc at any university, let alone MIT.
I didn’t know this, but it makes a lot of sense to me now. He’s one of those over educated stupid people. That whole thing about book smarts and street smarts. Some of the smartest people I’ve known in my lifetime have tattoos and drive tow trucks, some of the biggest dumbfucks I’ve known have 3 framed degrees on their office wall and a couple of letters after their name.
I’ve honestly never been able to sit through a full episode of Lex, no matter WHO he’s interviewing. Guy is practically dead behind the wheel, and his questions are so 2015 normie it’s painful (eg “do you think the mainstream media may REALLY BE biased?”)
It’s also hard to take him seriously when he looks like Robert Deniro fucked Mr Bean.
Instead of interviewing fellow jews, he's interviewing the shabos goy for once
Which of the guests are you objecting to specifically?
Trump sounded a bit low-energy and he misjudged his audience several times, like the 'millions of deaths' suggestion. He should have just said, 'affected'. Millions were affected.
The campaigning is maybe taking its toll or he's trying to play it more low-key. Needless to say, Obamala is in no way an alternative.
I mean, not to compare the two, but he's almost as old as Biden. You could already see the decline in his speech compared to how extraordinarily well-spoken he was in the early 1990s.
After 9 years of ceaseless attacks, fake investigations, indictments and now two assassination attempts, you'd have to be a man of steel to not be affected. The wonder is that he has endured so long.
Agree completely.
In all fairness, he was being interviewed by one of the most boring people on the internet
Jew media.