The entire reason any of this works and exists is because of women voting, making decisions, etc. A man looks at these stories and puts together some logic. A lot of what is being reported doesn't make sense. A lot of this would have been a stretch even for a nutcase like Pol Pot. So it's dismissed as bullshit.
Women on the other hand, it goes right to their all-controlling emotion center. "Awwwww the little babies shouldn't be baked in ovens that's horrible awwww, I bet they are not treating the poor little bitty kitty cats right either awwww. I'm so glad I'm such a good person to have such empathy."
I think you’re tapping into something vital here but slightly missing the mark:
I don’t see the problem here as “women voting” per se, but I think the way that atrocity propaganda works can absolutely be understood as “exploiting feminine thought patterns”. Because I think it’s safe to say that at some point in our lives every man here has believed in some piece of atrocity propaganda. Whether that’s The Big One™️ or one of the smaller ones, none of us were born immune to this.
[Left|logical|masculine] brain / [right|emotional|feminine] brain dichtomy might be an “oversimplification” but I think it’s a far more valuable starting point than the current standard model of the tabula rasa/blank slate ideology. The feminine mind has its appropriate place in the order of existence, and sending/manipulating men to fight is absolutely not within that remit
Yeah, I simplified it a bit. Even more simplified but along the lines of where you’re going: feminine thought patterns have become prevalent and not tempered at all.
Not even just with this topic, but things like you are supposed to coddle a tranny and tell them they are normal, when the best thing would be to tell them they are crazy and help them get away from it. There is no longer the attitude of taking the tough road in a situation, “for their own good,” because that would be an atrocity too.
The entire reason any of this works and exists is because of women voting, making decisions, etc. A man looks at these stories and puts together some logic. A lot of what is being reported doesn't make sense. A lot of this would have been a stretch even for a nutcase like Pol Pot. So it's dismissed as bullshit.
Women on the other hand, it goes right to their all-controlling emotion center. "Awwwww the little babies shouldn't be baked in ovens that's horrible awwww, I bet they are not treating the poor little bitty kitty cats right either awwww. I'm so glad I'm such a good person to have such empathy."
I think you’re tapping into something vital here but slightly missing the mark:
I don’t see the problem here as “women voting” per se, but I think the way that atrocity propaganda works can absolutely be understood as “exploiting feminine thought patterns”. Because I think it’s safe to say that at some point in our lives every man here has believed in some piece of atrocity propaganda. Whether that’s The Big One™️ or one of the smaller ones, none of us were born immune to this.
[Left|logical|masculine] brain / [right|emotional|feminine] brain dichtomy might be an “oversimplification” but I think it’s a far more valuable starting point than the current standard model of the tabula rasa/blank slate ideology. The feminine mind has its appropriate place in the order of existence, and sending/manipulating men to fight is absolutely not within that remit
Yeah, I simplified it a bit. Even more simplified but along the lines of where you’re going: feminine thought patterns have become prevalent and not tempered at all.
Not even just with this topic, but things like you are supposed to coddle a tranny and tell them they are normal, when the best thing would be to tell them they are crazy and help them get away from it. There is no longer the attitude of taking the tough road in a situation, “for their own good,” because that would be an atrocity too.