Climate Change being real, and being anthropogenic, doesn't mean that we should eradicate our economy by hiking our energy costs, submitting to CCP imperialism by making them the sole source of our energy infrastructure, and killing 50% of the planet's population by ceasing the use of fossil fuels. Don't even get me started on farmers being attacked for putting excess nitrogen in the water supply while cities are over-flowing the water supply with micro-plastics, fentanyl, and estrogen.
Take care of your shit and don't pollute, then all of the sudden you'll have a better environment.
Vance is aware of the damage that pollution can do from the East Palestine disaster, but that doesn't mean that the solution is Full Communism Now.
Climate change isn't real let alone anthropogenic.
Destroying whole forests and farmland for cheap/dense housing to hold all the illegal immigrants who won't fix their shit in their lands? Yeah - that's real.
Think that affects the water supplies in the area? Oh yeah. (Wondering why there's a drought in California when rainfalls have been statistically average? That's why)
Think that affects the energy supply? medical supply? police? cars?
Now do you think anybody in California REALLY cares about "Climate Change"? Or is that just a lie, created by Enron, to create the first bitcoin and told to children to get them to eat their bugs ?
Climate change isn't real let alone anthropogenic.
Destroying whole forests and farmland for cheap/dense housing to hold all the illegal immigrants who won't fix their shit in their lands? Yeah - that's real
I get the point you're making (or at least trying to make), but these two statements are directly contradictory. Man changes the climate by altering the environment (Forest->Grassland->Suburban->Urban.) Is weather (temperature, rainfall, etc.) changing due to this? Yes, but to an extent that's within the natural fluctuations that occur over time without human intervention.
Now, is humanity feeling the effects of climate more severely than the (recent) past? Definitely, but this has more to do with us making the bare minimum in infrastructure investments, and failing to account for the fact that the ground temperature in an urban or suburban environment where all the trees are newly planted is going to be higher than a rural environment with trees that are decades or centuries old.
Climate Change being real, and being anthropogenic, doesn't mean that we should eradicate our economy by hiking our energy costs, submitting to CCP imperialism by making them the sole source of our energy infrastructure, and killing 50% of the planet's population by ceasing the use of fossil fuels. Don't even get me started on farmers being attacked for putting excess nitrogen in the water supply while cities are over-flowing the water supply with micro-plastics, fentanyl, and estrogen.
Take care of your shit and don't pollute, then all of the sudden you'll have a better environment.
Vance is aware of the damage that pollution can do from the East Palestine disaster, but that doesn't mean that the solution is Full Communism Now.
Climate change isn't real let alone anthropogenic.
Destroying whole forests and farmland for cheap/dense housing to hold all the illegal immigrants who won't fix their shit in their lands? Yeah - that's real. Think that affects the water supplies in the area? Oh yeah. (Wondering why there's a drought in California when rainfalls have been statistically average? That's why) Think that affects the energy supply? medical supply? police? cars?
Now do you think anybody in California REALLY cares about "Climate Change"? Or is that just a lie, created by Enron, to create the first bitcoin and told to children to get them to eat their bugs ?
I get the point you're making (or at least trying to make), but these two statements are directly contradictory. Man changes the climate by altering the environment (Forest->Grassland->Suburban->Urban.) Is weather (temperature, rainfall, etc.) changing due to this? Yes, but to an extent that's within the natural fluctuations that occur over time without human intervention.
Now, is humanity feeling the effects of climate more severely than the (recent) past? Definitely, but this has more to do with us making the bare minimum in infrastructure investments, and failing to account for the fact that the ground temperature in an urban or suburban environment where all the trees are newly planted is going to be higher than a rural environment with trees that are decades or centuries old.