Kirsche dissects Upper Echelon's DEI video in autistic detail
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
This is two hours of my life I'm not getting back.
Kirsche goes into primary sources on BRIDGE here as she watches Upper Echelon (once again) draw incorrect conclusions about DEI ending due to the departments being dissolved.
Those departments were cancer. And them being removed is because Ideological Metastasis has happened.
Infested companies don't need to spend the money on a specialized organ once the cancer is everywhere. Kirsche plays internal videos documenting the pivot away from Equity in the branding, pointing out that BRIDGE is all about dissolving the DEI departments and making their goals organizational imperatives rather than the focus of a single department. A lot of the time, this means hiring consultants to ensure the DEI is omnipresent, rather than having a department which can become a target of lawfare.
Upper Echelon concludes his video by saying DEI is on the decline... whereas Kirsche cites their own internal videos saying that "the work will continue" under a different name. I know which one I trust: the words of the ideologues as spoken to their faithful, as relayed by Kirsche-- not Upper Echelon.
Upper Echelon sort of goes mask off for a bit, too. He talks about how Diversity & Inclusion aren't bad things... and it's either out of ignorance, not understanding that these are subverted terms, or willfully reading only the most positive meanings into them (intentionally taking leftist / motte positions at face value.) After watching him fumble around like a normie encountering leftist language for the first time, I have begun to think less of him.
Here's the timestamp from the original Upper Echelon vid, where he says: "there's nothing wrong with Diversity, Equity, or Inclusion..." The lad doesn't get it. The promises of higher revenue were entryism for the woke. Lies, to be sure, but useful ones for the left.
Whether he's being intentionally daft or not is an open question. I know I unsubbed from him the last time he was this stupid. I can't unsub more or harder, even though I sorely want to.
He tries to hard to be a centrist at times so plays down and makes excuses for ideologically motivated actions.