It isn't eugenics to CURE something, if it was then say goodbye to ALL medicine
Most of those 'fascinating, compelling, blah blah blah' happened in an attempt to make life better if not eventually cure them. If I went to a blind person and had the cure to blindness, 100% of them would take it immediately.
Disability ain't a race you shallow shitstains, it's a harder difficulty to live compared to the majority.
To be fair the closest thing we have to a cure for most metabolic disabilities is just genetically screening embryos. On a population level "curing" the disability that way basically is just eugenics.
Eugenics being "bad" is one of the worst catastrophes to befall on humanity. So nazis liked eugenics. So what? Nazis also liked to breathe air and drink water, figure this out.
As long as they're non-mandatory, what's wrong with genetics? Given that most marriages are loveless or broken anyways, why wouldn't I wish to create kids with a partner that either maximizes the chance of them being really smart (and thus getting far in life) or really healthy (which matters a lot). Or maybe both?
Sure, we don't know if eugenics can work that well or precise with humanity. But if we don't study - we'll never know.
People selectively breed despite their mealymouthed disclaimers. Eugenics as governmental policy runs into ethical problems in the debate over which characteristics are more advantageous than others and whether or not certain individuals should be legally prohibited from reproducing.
Do these psychos even realise that:
It isn't eugenics to CURE something, if it was then say goodbye to ALL medicine
Most of those 'fascinating, compelling, blah blah blah' happened in an attempt to make life better if not eventually cure them. If I went to a blind person and had the cure to blindness, 100% of them would take it immediately.
Disability ain't a race you shallow shitstains, it's a harder difficulty to live compared to the majority.
To be fair the closest thing we have to a cure for most metabolic disabilities is just genetically screening embryos. On a population level "curing" the disability that way basically is just eugenics.
But that just means eugenics isn't all bad...
Eugenics being "bad" is one of the worst catastrophes to befall on humanity. So nazis liked eugenics. So what? Nazis also liked to breathe air and drink water, figure this out.
As long as they're non-mandatory, what's wrong with genetics? Given that most marriages are loveless or broken anyways, why wouldn't I wish to create kids with a partner that either maximizes the chance of them being really smart (and thus getting far in life) or really healthy (which matters a lot). Or maybe both?
Sure, we don't know if eugenics can work that well or precise with humanity. But if we don't study - we'll never know.
People selectively breed despite their mealymouthed disclaimers. Eugenics as governmental policy runs into ethical problems in the debate over which characteristics are more advantageous than others and whether or not certain individuals should be legally prohibited from reproducing.