When it rains it pours, CDO Sherri Ann Charleston, has apparently been plagiarizing materials her entire career to include copy pasting a study her husband did in 2012
Every liberal arts academic in a position of power has done this. It has been the standard for decades, all while they increase tuition by 500% to make more room for administration positions for these corrupt assholes.
No, I would not say every academic has done this. Certainly the diversity-cultists have inculcated a culture of corruption. Many fields have been utterly corrupted, and may fields were corrupt from day one. "Justice studies," "black studies," "diversity studies," were morally void and corrupt from day one. They are empty by design.
History, English, philosophy, and many others have been infected--badly--but we can still fight back.
Critical studies is pseudo-scholarship, or what I like to call "scholarshit." Most if not all citations in this academic grift niche are from the same circle of retards. There is an industry, pointed out decades ago by Camille Paglia, in her great essay "Junk Bonds and Corporate Raiders": a hermetic circle of critical studies citations in papers used exclusively to gain tenure and to present at schmoozing conferences like the MLA, not to add anything new or even interesting to their batshit crazy, unreadable literature, since they make the same arguments with the same sources over and over again, with small permutations.
When it rains it pours, CDO Sherri Ann Charleston, has apparently been plagiarizing materials her entire career to include copy pasting a study her husband did in 2012
Every liberal arts academic in a position of power has done this. It has been the standard for decades, all while they increase tuition by 500% to make more room for administration positions for these corrupt assholes.
Seriously, burn the academy down. Start over.
No, I would not say every academic has done this. Certainly the diversity-cultists have inculcated a culture of corruption. Many fields have been utterly corrupted, and may fields were corrupt from day one. "Justice studies," "black studies," "diversity studies," were morally void and corrupt from day one. They are empty by design.
History, English, philosophy, and many others have been infected--badly--but we can still fight back.
Critical studies is pseudo-scholarship, or what I like to call "scholarshit." Most if not all citations in this academic grift niche are from the same circle of retards. There is an industry, pointed out decades ago by Camille Paglia, in her great essay "Junk Bonds and Corporate Raiders": a hermetic circle of critical studies citations in papers used exclusively to gain tenure and to present at schmoozing conferences like the MLA, not to add anything new or even interesting to their batshit crazy, unreadable literature, since they make the same arguments with the same sources over and over again, with small permutations.