Now I'm wondering what this is even going to look like. Leaked FBI documents showed that they tried to redirect White Nationalists into religion (i.e. Christian Nationalism instead). I'm guessing that will be part of it. I also expect a fresh batch of astroturfed "Breadtubers discuss masculinity" nonsense and promoting of garbage like r/MensLib.
I don't even get why they're so alarmed by incels in particular. There's really not much difference between their worldview and trannies (same sort of spiteful mutant/queer theory logic), and the feds adore trannies.
Maybe they will funnel try to funnel people into being trannies. There's already pro-tranny momentum there, as we've seen from the likes of TheImp.
My theory is, the hate against "incels" primarily comes from older millennial women seeing the wall on the horizon. Notice that they don't complain about "nice guys" anymore. Being called a worn-out whore was funny for women in the late teens and early 20s, when they could brush it off. Now, it hits closer to home. Lonely men didn't suddenly become more dangerous, but women feel a lot more threatened by them now than they used to, not for being dangerous, but being honest. That translates easily into making lonely men a domestic enemy. And with how many washed-out career women hold middle management positions in every institution, you've got the perfect intersection of true believers and cynical power to create the incel scare.
And with how many washed-out career women hold middle management positions in every institution, you've got the perfect intersection of true believers and cynical power to create the incel scare.
Going after incels politically aligns the feds and near-wall women. It means means opposing the feds also means opposing near-wall women and their neurotic fears and outrage. Not only is that a difficult big-picture social hurdle, many of them individually hold power of you, and will vindictively use it.
Paying for one agent to control one position in one institution is expensive, and you run the risk of being exposed or betrayed. Same goes for bribes. Alternatively, paying for these studies and going after lonely men (the least sympathetic demographic) is buying millions of sympathizers for $1 a pop.
Now I'm wondering what this is even going to look like. Leaked FBI documents showed that they tried to redirect White Nationalists into religion (i.e. Christian Nationalism instead). I'm guessing that will be part of it. I also expect a fresh batch of astroturfed "Breadtubers discuss masculinity" nonsense and promoting of garbage like r/MensLib.
I don't even get why they're so alarmed by incels in particular. There's really not much difference between their worldview and trannies (same sort of spiteful mutant/queer theory logic), and the feds adore trannies.
Maybe they will funnel try to funnel people into being trannies. There's already pro-tranny momentum there, as we've seen from the likes of TheImp.
My theory is, the hate against "incels" primarily comes from older millennial women seeing the wall on the horizon. Notice that they don't complain about "nice guys" anymore. Being called a worn-out whore was funny for women in the late teens and early 20s, when they could brush it off. Now, it hits closer to home. Lonely men didn't suddenly become more dangerous, but women feel a lot more threatened by them now than they used to, not for being dangerous, but being honest. That translates easily into making lonely men a domestic enemy. And with how many washed-out career women hold middle management positions in every institution, you've got the perfect intersection of true believers and cynical power to create the incel scare.
We're talking about the DHS considering them a threat, not random women bitching on Twitter though.
Going after incels politically aligns the feds and near-wall women. It means means opposing the feds also means opposing near-wall women and their neurotic fears and outrage. Not only is that a difficult big-picture social hurdle, many of them individually hold power of you, and will vindictively use it.
Paying for one agent to control one position in one institution is expensive, and you run the risk of being exposed or betrayed. Same goes for bribes. Alternatively, paying for these studies and going after lonely men (the least sympathetic demographic) is buying millions of sympathizers for $1 a pop.
DHS doesn't care about popularity. Their immigration policies are so bad, they might cost Biden 2024.
Your mistake is assuming those are different things.