Depends on the tribe. Most do indeed, but there are a handful (usually the Lakota) who still get pissy about it. When you see a tribe complaining about something, it is almost always Lakota. Others are even on the based side (like the tribe in Nevada that decided to take exactly zero shit from Eco-Protestors and rammed their blockade).
Just for what I know, here in my state (Kansas) we have 4 tribes (Iowa, Kickapoo, Sac and Fox, and Prairie Band Potawatomi). At least from what I have seen from living in the area, most of the tribes and their members around here take an attitude of "What is in the past is done. Let us walk forward hand in hand instead of with clenched fist." But they are also doing ok for themselves, as I have driven through the Kickapoo reservation and forgot where I was until I drove past their museum because it looked a lot like everything else around it.
But when my family was on a road trip one time, we drove through a Sioux reservation in South Dakota on the way to the Badlands. It looked like we had entered a damn third-world country (with the road to match). I am sure it is just a coincidence that the Sioux are one of the more activist minded tribes (though I imagine it is to cover up corruption from Elders).
Somewhat yes, although I think there are cases where it didn't work out well for quieter smaller ones either.
I suspect some of it's also slightly due to regional variables, in relation to where their reservations were finally set up. Wouldn't be surprised if a few tribes lucked out on some oil rich plots of land and made bank.
This insanity is all over the place with the Leftists right now. They are really, actively, supporting mass murder and genocide.
I have seen some people claim it will be as damaging to the Left supporting this as it was for them to support the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956. Where all but the most die-hard Leftist looks at them and says "What the fuck is wrong with you?!" and gets turned away.
Perhaps too much to ask with a lot of what is happening, but I imagine in decades from now we will be talking about "Hamasies" in the same way we talk about Tankies.
Pretty sure leftards obsess more about the colonies and displacement of native tribes than the remaining your average native American does.
Depends on the tribe. Most do indeed, but there are a handful (usually the Lakota) who still get pissy about it. When you see a tribe complaining about something, it is almost always Lakota. Others are even on the based side (like the tribe in Nevada that decided to take exactly zero shit from Eco-Protestors and rammed their blockade).
Oh very much true. Although usually it's the tribal leaders bitching, not as much individuals who are just trying to get by and live their lives.
Though I think in that same respect it would still vary based on the history of that person's tribe and how his or her life is going in general.
Just for what I know, here in my state (Kansas) we have 4 tribes (Iowa, Kickapoo, Sac and Fox, and Prairie Band Potawatomi). At least from what I have seen from living in the area, most of the tribes and their members around here take an attitude of "What is in the past is done. Let us walk forward hand in hand instead of with clenched fist." But they are also doing ok for themselves, as I have driven through the Kickapoo reservation and forgot where I was until I drove past their museum because it looked a lot like everything else around it.
But when my family was on a road trip one time, we drove through a Sioux reservation in South Dakota on the way to the Badlands. It looked like we had entered a damn third-world country (with the road to match). I am sure it is just a coincidence that the Sioux are one of the more activist minded tribes (though I imagine it is to cover up corruption from Elders).
Probably also just a coincidence that the Lakota/Sioux were one of the most savage and violent tribes.
Seems the bigger, more famous, and "prouder" the tribe is, the worse state it's in.
Somewhat yes, although I think there are cases where it didn't work out well for quieter smaller ones either.
I suspect some of it's also slightly due to regional variables, in relation to where their reservations were finally set up. Wouldn't be surprised if a few tribes lucked out on some oil rich plots of land and made bank.
Same for the name 'Redskins'.
Indeed.
This insanity is all over the place with the Leftists right now. They are really, actively, supporting mass murder and genocide.
Even Beanie Man has been losing his shit over it.
This is about as blunt as they've been since Noam Chomsky advocated for people who refused to get injections be intentionally starved into compliance.
They're genocidal maniacs through and through. They do not care how many die, each death is a moral imperative. Steven Crowder is basically right on this summation: "One side is driven by: 'you killed my family and raped my daughter'. The other side is driven by: 'You're so evil that we're justified in killing your family and raping your daughter'.
That is absolutely how all the Leftists think, all of the time.
I have seen some people claim it will be as damaging to the Left supporting this as it was for them to support the Soviet invasion of Hungary in 1956. Where all but the most die-hard Leftist looks at them and says "What the fuck is wrong with you?!" and gets turned away.
Perhaps too much to ask with a lot of what is happening, but I imagine in decades from now we will be talking about "Hamasies" in the same way we talk about Tankies.
your proposal is acceptable.
Politics sure make strange bedfellows.
It’s just the friend/enemy distinction in action, and a lot of tribes are friends with each other only insofar as they want the same people dead.
If you could snap your fingers and remove all of the white peoples tomorrow, earth would be more violent, not less.
Probably because "white peoples" are some of the least violent and racist people in the world.
Say no more.
Eh, 'Palestine' did not exist.
No, it was still wrong when they did it.
Again, you don't commit genocide in response to ethnic conflict and land dispute.
"Come now, Mr. Worf. You're a Klingon. Don't tell me you'd object to a little genocide in the name of 'self-defense'."