I forget the specifics but the case you're referring to was procedural. Basically they ruled that kangaroo court the fags ran to disregarded religious liberty (which is why it was set up to begin with of course) but they never ruled on the constitutional question of what religious liberty requires. Now they have, so hopefully the lower courts will put a stop to bad faith attempts to evade the ruling.
I see. That's very weird. Seems like clarifying that religious liberty exists in the ruling would have been a no brainer in the cake case. But I guess they can only rule on whatever's specifically put in front of them, or however it works.
they can only rule on whatever's specifically put in front of them
Correct. Although you can also be an activist judge and make shit up like Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor. You won't be respected for it as Gorsuch showed in this case (copied from YesMovement above):
The question at hand is, “Can a State force someone who provides her own expressive services to abandon her conscience and speak its preferred message instead?” Gorsuch said. “When the dissent finally gets around to that question— more than halfway into its opinion—it reimagines the facts of this case from top to bottom,” he wrote.
I thought it was already determined that you don't have to Bake The Cake? It was even the same state that tried to pull this shit last time.
I forget the specifics but the case you're referring to was procedural. Basically they ruled that kangaroo court the fags ran to disregarded religious liberty (which is why it was set up to begin with of course) but they never ruled on the constitutional question of what religious liberty requires. Now they have, so hopefully the lower courts will put a stop to bad faith attempts to evade the ruling.
I see. That's very weird. Seems like clarifying that religious liberty exists in the ruling would have been a no brainer in the cake case. But I guess they can only rule on whatever's specifically put in front of them, or however it works.
Correct. Although you can also be an activist judge and make shit up like Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor. You won't be respected for it as Gorsuch showed in this case (copied from YesMovement above):