AOC for example using the typical teenage girl retort of claiming men who criticise her just want to date her when literally nobody fucking brought it up.
Apart from the fact that AOC basically just acts like a teenager all the time, the other thing happening there is that women are wired to want to be perceived as pretty. No matter how much they claim they want to be seen as successful, fierce, StRoNg AnD cOnFiDeNt, you’ll notice that a majority of the ways they express those alleged traits is based on appearance and that even when they make social media posts about how successful or fierce they are, it always comes with the hottest selfie they can get in the moment and the comments are half “you look great, girl!” It’s based in “if I’m hot I get to have sex” psychologically, but they get similar dopamine hits from being told they look good, be talked about as if they look good, getting to do things associated with good looking people (getting asked to prom, rushing a sorority, etc etc). It’s just part of their makeup. Even Lizzo couldn’t be content with being perceived as a talent musician, or with her celebrity wealth, or with all the cool stuff and opportunities she has as a result. No, even she has to try and make people call her the new beauty standard, because she’s a woman and women need to be perceived as attractive.
They're incentivizing and rewarding sociopathic behavior, then getting mad that sociopathy is on the rise. But then, that's pretty much the MO of the leftist woman. Demand bad things, then act shocked when you get bad things. To call it childish would be an insult to children.
100€ (because I'm a Eurofag) says that the moderation will be a team of trannies that will use the plattform to abuse the women that use it, CON-Style. Also lot's of infighting, hurt feelings and lost money.
And everyone will say, that they didn't anticipate this to blow up so spectacularily.
TwoXChromosomes stickied a call for mass violence against men from a user who had threatened a mass shooting on men's communities.
When this happened, r/GenderCritical started the theory that the moderators were men acting to make women look bad.
This is clear BS, as feminist writings are filled with open calls for violence, from as far back as 1893 and likely further (even though we don't have evidence of these writings existing earlier than that).
They were not worried innocent people would be killed. They were worried that people would finally see the malevolence of the average woman and the dark desires of every feminist.
Nah, women only allow trannies to get power when they can use it to get the state to intervene to protect their status.
So, let's try again. With this quote of yours in mind: Explain how reddit can be controlled by trannies while the people you claim are secretly in power get banned and muted.
It isn't controlled by trannies. Such a theory is fucking ridiculous. It's always been controlled by women, that's why you can't speak up against them and even places like MensRights have to include "not all women" disclaimers.
GenderCritical was banned because they were advocating violence and everyone, left and right, thought they would be the next group to commit a mass shooting.
If you look at their new site, you would see that the fears are justified. We haven't seen the last feminist lunatic "identifying as a man" to hide her true motives.
Funny, you'd think a place controlled by women wouldn't censor them when they speak out against men in girls changing rooms and men destroying their little make-believe-sports.
A place controlled by women wouldn't hate that much on their champions like JK and wouldn't consider speaking out against trannies as hate speech.
Go on reddit right now and post that you think that women should have their own leagues where trannies shouldn't be allowed and watch your account get banned in an instant.
Advocating for women is only allowed if you include mentally ill men in that very group. And you're saying it's the former that are in control when they are not allowed to speak up against the latter
You know the old adage: If you want to know who is in control, ask who you cannot critizise.
Sure, women rank higher than men, but both are beneath the people that believe they should have the right to rub their assholes into little children faces and be praised for doing so.
Because the hellspawn want to control the GOP. It's an election season and their man is DeSimptis. This is the exact same strategy they employed in the UK, except the fake issue that time was "domestic abuse rises".
They want to play victim and activate the tradcucks stuck in the past.
We lead by 42%. We need to stay ahead of their attacks. Deport ConPro now.
It'll get shut down quick once the ugly girls come together in mutual hatred of the less ugly girls posting there and begin to dox each other, as women always do.
Apart from the fact that AOC basically just acts like a teenager all the time, the other thing happening there is that women are wired to want to be perceived as pretty. No matter how much they claim they want to be seen as successful, fierce, StRoNg AnD cOnFiDeNt, you’ll notice that a majority of the ways they express those alleged traits is based on appearance and that even when they make social media posts about how successful or fierce they are, it always comes with the hottest selfie they can get in the moment and the comments are half “you look great, girl!” It’s based in “if I’m hot I get to have sex” psychologically, but they get similar dopamine hits from being told they look good, be talked about as if they look good, getting to do things associated with good looking people (getting asked to prom, rushing a sorority, etc etc). It’s just part of their makeup. Even Lizzo couldn’t be content with being perceived as a talent musician, or with her celebrity wealth, or with all the cool stuff and opportunities she has as a result. No, even she has to try and make people call her the new beauty standard, because she’s a woman and women need to be perceived as attractive.
They're incentivizing and rewarding sociopathic behavior, then getting mad that sociopathy is on the rise. But then, that's pretty much the MO of the leftist woman. Demand bad things, then act shocked when you get bad things. To call it childish would be an insult to children.
100€ (because I'm a Eurofag) says that the moderation will be a team of trannies that will use the plattform to abuse the women that use it, CON-Style. Also lot's of infighting, hurt feelings and lost money.
And everyone will say, that they didn't anticipate this to blow up so spectacularily.
In 2 years (if I'm being generous) it will be entirely taken over by "women", like all the women-focused reddit groups.
Nah, women only allow trannies to get power when they can use it to get the state to intervene to protect their status.
See also : Rob! 2024
Explain reddit then.
Okay.
TwoXChromosomes stickied a call for mass violence against men from a user who had threatened a mass shooting on men's communities.
When this happened, r/GenderCritical started the theory that the moderators were men acting to make women look bad.
This is clear BS, as feminist writings are filled with open calls for violence, from as far back as 1893 and likely further (even though we don't have evidence of these writings existing earlier than that).
They were not worried innocent people would be killed. They were worried that people would finally see the malevolence of the average woman and the dark desires of every feminist.
So, let's try again. With this quote of yours in mind: Explain how reddit can be controlled by trannies while the people you claim are secretly in power get banned and muted.
Your tolerance for her horseshit is admirable.
It isn't controlled by trannies. Such a theory is fucking ridiculous. It's always been controlled by women, that's why you can't speak up against them and even places like MensRights have to include "not all women" disclaimers.
GenderCritical was banned because they were advocating violence and everyone, left and right, thought they would be the next group to commit a mass shooting.
If you look at their new site, you would see that the fears are justified. We haven't seen the last feminist lunatic "identifying as a man" to hide her true motives.
Funny, you'd think a place controlled by women wouldn't censor them when they speak out against men in girls changing rooms and men destroying their little make-believe-sports.
A place controlled by women wouldn't hate that much on their champions like JK and wouldn't consider speaking out against trannies as hate speech.
Go on reddit right now and post that you think that women should have their own leagues where trannies shouldn't be allowed and watch your account get banned in an instant.
Advocating for women is only allowed if you include mentally ill men in that very group. And you're saying it's the former that are in control when they are not allowed to speak up against the latter
You know the old adage: If you want to know who is in control, ask who you cannot critizise.
Sure, women rank higher than men, but both are beneath the people that believe they should have the right to rub their assholes into little children faces and be praised for doing so.
Because the hellspawn want to control the GOP. It's an election season and their man is DeSimptis. This is the exact same strategy they employed in the UK, except the fake issue that time was "domestic abuse rises".
They want to play victim and activate the tradcucks stuck in the past.
We lead by 42%. We need to stay ahead of their attacks. Deport ConPro now.
troons rubbing their hands together
Yes, but I think he's talking about how they will keep it "women only".
I don't think they're scared of being doxxed. What repercussions will come? Will companies fire them for taking part in things like this? I doubt it
It'll get shut down quick once the ugly girls come together in mutual hatred of the less ugly girls posting there and begin to dox each other, as women always do.
>use "AWDTSG" multiple times
>explain what it means or stands for zero times
The absolute lack of theory of mind
Are We Dating The Same Guy?
It's a feminist "joke" about how all men are caricatures of evil.
Hoes chasing the top 5% and refusing to settle at their own level mad about that 5% enjoying the avalanche of pussy, more at 11:00.