There has still been no official reason given for the removal.
It's important to note that this almost certainly wasn't done because of low numbers. Rather, the choice was almost certainly more linked to the review-bombing and an intense number of bad-faith, inaccurate posts.
People who thought a shit movie was shit = bad faith, inaccurate posts.
The entire point of a review is for a person to give their opinion of the movie, as critic scores have been hilariously unreliable and almost always at ends with user scores they must now “fix” the bad reviews.
Completely removing the audience score from a project is an unprecedented move by Rotten Tomatoes. The closest thing to it was when the site excised a majority of Captain Marvel's view ratings, with its reasoning being that it "identified a bug in the post-release functionality."
Yes, the bug of a massive flop, just like this turd
There's no such thing as review bombing. If people shit on a product because they hate the creator, that is a valid (if often stupid) review. If people can't even stand the look of the trailer to bother watching it, that is also a valid review.
One thing that cracks me up about these race swapped films is that they can't even bother to get good looking negros and asians. Ariel looks like a cow and tinkerbell looks like a crack head. Eww.
Generally, "review bombing" means leaving a negative review without consuming product to any degree whatsoever.
Someone who watches a movie, decides it sucks 15 minutes in, and leaves a bad review isn't review bombing. Someone who sees that people hate something on Twitter and decides to give it a bad review without knowing anything about it is review bombing.
The Cleopatra thing is borderline. I know for a fact it's racist garbage without needing to see it. The trailers, the creator, the lead actress, they've all let me know just how unwatchably shitty it is. So to watch even five minutes would be unnecessary. I already have all the information I need.
The real issue is that most people cannot differentiate between "I know it will be bad" and "I've been told it's bad and will uncritically parrot that opinion".
People who thought a shit movie was shit = bad faith, inaccurate posts.
The entire point of a review is for a person to give their opinion of the movie, as critic scores have been hilariously unreliable and almost always at ends with user scores they must now “fix” the bad reviews.
Yes, the bug of a massive flop, just like this turd
There's no such thing as review bombing. If people shit on a product because they hate the creator, that is a valid (if often stupid) review. If people can't even stand the look of the trailer to bother watching it, that is also a valid review.
One thing that cracks me up about these race swapped films is that they can't even bother to get good looking negros and asians. Ariel looks like a cow and tinkerbell looks like a crack head. Eww.
A person who walks out of a movie 20 minutes in has an opinion worth sharing.
Generally, "review bombing" means leaving a negative review without consuming product to any degree whatsoever.
Someone who watches a movie, decides it sucks 15 minutes in, and leaves a bad review isn't review bombing. Someone who sees that people hate something on Twitter and decides to give it a bad review without knowing anything about it is review bombing.
The Cleopatra thing is borderline. I know for a fact it's racist garbage without needing to see it. The trailers, the creator, the lead actress, they've all let me know just how unwatchably shitty it is. So to watch even five minutes would be unnecessary. I already have all the information I need.
The real issue is that most people cannot differentiate between "I know it will be bad" and "I've been told it's bad and will uncritically parrot that opinion".