Found this article pretty funny, this journalism must be pretty dense or selectively ignorant on YouTube's rabbit hole algorithm.
They play shocked when after an hour of going through random videos they get one about Andrew Tate.
Also I'm pretty sure you select what videos to watch on YT shorts, so the fact that they're getting more and more as the experiment continues- it just shows that they had a bias of selecting the ones they wanted to prove a point with.
And I also find it pretty funny that it isn't just Andrew Tate and his brother who are banned, it's him entirely even if it's a proxy person uploading clips which have him in it. Absolutely mental
Yet, I wonder why they'll never do this with a 13 year old girl. Maybe girls transing themselves from YT propaganda isn't good news yet?
I'm not even on board with the whole Andrew Tate thing he's a net negative. The thing is, what content is there even for 13 year old boys? Maybe some anime, but many are not at all interested in that, think it's gay, or whatever. Beyond that, you've got Andrew Tate or woke indoctrination. That's it. My teen cousin goes in and out through interest in Tate's stuff, "omg his Bugatti is cool type stuff" etc., because there really is nothing else.
He is. He's an insecure loser who overcompensates like short man syndrome on steroids. This is not the face of masculinity.
He also says a lot of dumb shit that make him (and by extension his fans) look bad. He also talks about women as if they were all the whores he spends all his time around doing his cam girl pimp shit.
He's also trashy & low class. This isn't a person who should be a role model for anyone. He basically just acts like any other trashy black dude would.
They are. And it isn't up for debate.