It's fifty fucking percent of the population, there's affirmative action incentives, and more.
You finding a woman somewhere in this and thinking that proves your insane theories doesn't hold water. Your theories make less sense than the patriarchy, or white supremacy.
They just happen to be there every time men are harmed.
Do you realize that even with the 50% odds of any position being a woman, winning so many coinflips one after the other is like winning the lottery, ten times over.
Is the person shilling the vax a woman.
First coinflip. 50% chance.
Is the person who approved it at the FDA also a woman.
Second coinflip. 25% chance of winning both.
Are most of the victims men?
Third coinflip. 12.5% chance of winning all three.
Is the person in charge of the CDC's ethics a woman?
They [women] just happen to be there every time men are harmed.
Men are also there almost every time another man is harmed. That's sort of what happens when you're, as I mentioned, 50% of the population.
Do you realize that even with the 50% odds of any position being a woman, winning so many coinflips one after the other is like winning the lottery, ten times over.
Except 'winning a coinflip' stops when you set eyes on a woman. You could do the exact same thing if you stopped at men.
Men shill the vaccine too. 50%. Head of the FDA, man. 25%. Head of the CDC at the time, man. 12.5%. Men were involved in the creation of the virus. 6.25%. President, man. 3.125%. Governor of (pick state with male governor) CA, man. Under 2% chance. Head of NIAID, man. 0.78%
And so on. If pick and choose, and stop on men, I can make your exact same argument (although I know you'll say it's different because reasons), and conclude that there's a conspiracy where men want to kill men.
Showing how Twitter deceived in the past needs to come with a commitment to the truth in the future, not just the implication of that commitment.
How much is there?
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1636729274789949440
I will never get tired of being right.
It's fifty fucking percent of the population, there's affirmative action incentives, and more.
You finding a woman somewhere in this and thinking that proves your insane theories doesn't hold water. Your theories make less sense than the patriarchy, or white supremacy.
They just happen to be there every time men are harmed.
Do you realize that even with the 50% odds of any position being a woman, winning so many coinflips one after the other is like winning the lottery, ten times over.
Is the person shilling the vax a woman.
First coinflip. 50% chance.
Is the person who approved it at the FDA also a woman.
Second coinflip. 25% chance of winning both.
Are most of the victims men?
Third coinflip. 12.5% chance of winning all three.
Is the person in charge of the CDC's ethics a woman?
Fourth coinflip. 6.25% chance.
Is the person in charge of the CDC a woman?
Fifth coinflip. 3.125% chance.
Is the person who created the virus a woman?
Sixth coinflip. Under 2% chance.
Men are also there almost every time another man is harmed. That's sort of what happens when you're, as I mentioned, 50% of the population.
Except 'winning a coinflip' stops when you set eyes on a woman. You could do the exact same thing if you stopped at men.
Men shill the vaccine too. 50%. Head of the FDA, man. 25%. Head of the CDC at the time, man. 12.5%. Men were involved in the creation of the virus. 6.25%. President, man. 3.125%. Governor of (pick state with male governor) CA, man. Under 2% chance. Head of NIAID, man. 0.78%
And so on. If pick and choose, and stop on men, I can make your exact same argument (although I know you'll say it's different because reasons), and conclude that there's a conspiracy where men want to kill men.
Now do jews
What were you right about?
whamen
"Womanman bad" to be precise.
LOL