It can also be attributed to literally any good/bad thing. I remember a gaming company, forget the name but I think they created "league of giants" or something, posted a report saying their diversity goals resulted in a net 5% increase in viewership. What they didn't mention was that the 2 branches where they pushed for it (europe and north america) were down 40% and the massive viewership increase was from the 95% male dominated korea/china parts.
Lol this suicidal idiot doesn't realize that this'll result in a more patriarchal society taking over. They'll see women like this being a society's extinction and will basically ensure women are nohing more than baby-makers for the next hundred years or so.
They are begging to be challenged and raped. Seems modern women vote to invite outsider men in to challenge the native men. Or to make the lives of native men horrible. Its the only reason why rapefugees are pushed. Some large cuckery thing going on.
I really do think this is it. Post-modern feminism going mainstream has taken the typical scenario of the girlfriend or wife shit testing their boyfriend or husband to see what they can get away with before the man puts their foot down, to now women as a collective essentially shit testing an entire country to see what they can get away with.
Subconsciously they are seeking the “patriarchy” they constantly shriek about to re-emerge and put them in their place. They’ll get it one way or another, by either the native men or the migrants they insist on letting in.
Ultimately if we survive this societal shit test we really may need to revisit the 19th amendment. Men by and large will vote for their nation’s interest, largely because they can be drafted, pay a majority of the taxes, and have skin in the game. Women by and large vote for their own interests at the expense of society writ-large. I’m also mostly a retard so maybe not.
I just hope that when we repeal the 19th that we instate some kind of rule where only net-positive tax payers get to vote, because voting to loot the treasury should disqualify you permanently from having a say.
do you believe that rape of women is uniquely more severe in war than rape of men (the biggest feminists will say yes, even most trads will say yes, that will disqualify them)
That depends on what "severe" means, does it not? In moral terms they're equivalently bad, but in practical terms, one has a not-insignificant potential for a serious consequence that the other simply cannot carry in that a raped man cannot get pregnant but a raped woman can. Not to mention that that child is going to grow up fatherless, which we know usually produces a lower-quality offspring. Both are morally intolerable, but if we are speaking about potential for societal damage, strictly speaking, one is more severe.
This was my thought too. Its worse because of biology.
Also citizens united was about a documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton, she wanted it shut down. You can't realistically make films, documentaries that get seen by many people all on your lonesome, it requires groups, it requires corporations. And they wanted them banned. That hillary is the one wanting it banned is all I need to know that it's a good thing it didn't happen.
No, men and boys are raped far worse than women and girls in war. With women and girls it's just penetration with a penis, with men and boys it's penetration with a penis in the anus, with weapons, being castrated, being literally branded on your body, being scalped and tied down, all with lasting bodily injury and disfigurement.
I had failed to consider that. What you say makes sense, and I understand why you chose the word "severe" now. Thank you for explaining.
...because there are biological and evolutionary reasons why it must be so, and you can't social engineer these instincts away in a decade or two.
A peaceful world rewards the risks and dangers that men assume as part of their biological role. The feminized world we're in is about to drag us into war.
That is the same as saying the country perished due to feminism.
Misogyny is the ultimate “I don’t like making sacrifices like men” buzzword.
It can also be attributed to literally any good/bad thing. I remember a gaming company, forget the name but I think they created "league of giants" or something, posted a report saying their diversity goals resulted in a net 5% increase in viewership. What they didn't mention was that the 2 branches where they pushed for it (europe and north america) were down 40% and the massive viewership increase was from the 95% male dominated korea/china parts.
More accurate.
Lol this suicidal idiot doesn't realize that this'll result in a more patriarchal society taking over. They'll see women like this being a society's extinction and will basically ensure women are nohing more than baby-makers for the next hundred years or so.
They are begging to be challenged and raped. Seems modern women vote to invite outsider men in to challenge the native men. Or to make the lives of native men horrible. Its the only reason why rapefugees are pushed. Some large cuckery thing going on.
I really do think this is it. Post-modern feminism going mainstream has taken the typical scenario of the girlfriend or wife shit testing their boyfriend or husband to see what they can get away with before the man puts their foot down, to now women as a collective essentially shit testing an entire country to see what they can get away with.
Subconsciously they are seeking the “patriarchy” they constantly shriek about to re-emerge and put them in their place. They’ll get it one way or another, by either the native men or the migrants they insist on letting in.
Ultimately if we survive this societal shit test we really may need to revisit the 19th amendment. Men by and large will vote for their nation’s interest, largely because they can be drafted, pay a majority of the taxes, and have skin in the game. Women by and large vote for their own interests at the expense of society writ-large. I’m also mostly a retard so maybe not.
Makes sense. For unmarried feminists, the government/country is their husband.
I just hope that when we repeal the 19th that we instate some kind of rule where only net-positive tax payers get to vote, because voting to loot the treasury should disqualify you permanently from having a say.
That depends on what "severe" means, does it not? In moral terms they're equivalently bad, but in practical terms, one has a not-insignificant potential for a serious consequence that the other simply cannot carry in that a raped man cannot get pregnant but a raped woman can. Not to mention that that child is going to grow up fatherless, which we know usually produces a lower-quality offspring. Both are morally intolerable, but if we are speaking about potential for societal damage, strictly speaking, one is more severe.
This was my thought too. Its worse because of biology.
Also citizens united was about a documentary criticizing Hillary Clinton, she wanted it shut down. You can't realistically make films, documentaries that get seen by many people all on your lonesome, it requires groups, it requires corporations. And they wanted them banned. That hillary is the one wanting it banned is all I need to know that it's a good thing it didn't happen.
There are states where a raped man can be held financially accountable for the offspring that rape produced with the threat of imprisonment.
I had failed to consider that. What you say makes sense, and I understand why you chose the word "severe" now. Thank you for explaining.
They'd never say that glowing shit about MGTOW.
Only women can leave the system. Men must jump into the meat grinder.
It's the only thing most of the left and right agree on.
...because there are biological and evolutionary reasons why it must be so, and you can't social engineer these instincts away in a decade or two.
A peaceful world rewards the risks and dangers that men assume as part of their biological role. The feminized world we're in is about to drag us into war.
Japanese reconquers the peninsula when?
North Korea would make a killing selling its women to men in SK like they do with China.
Afghanistan's birth rates are high. Feminists are retarded. Water is wet.
When I brought up 4B, a lot of people said 4B is only 4000 people and cited an old article on them.
This tweet has more than 4,000 likes. It has a quarter of a million views.
4B is way bigger than they're letting on, and it's a movement that openly calls for the genocide of so-called "irredeemable" Korean men.
There is no more hateful class of women than Asian women. That whole meme about them being great alternatives is bullshit.
I don't know much about them, but this tweet looks exactly like something you would say with sexes reversed.
Koreans are the worst of all the Asians though. Thai girls are still better then anything the west has to offer.
Thai girls are usually born male.
Obviously I mean the rare biological females
There's no such thing, only ladyboys.
deport her to the north
"A growing number"... So from like 10 to, say, 13?
From 4B to 4F