Replace "woman" with "jew" and "misogyny" with "antisemitism" and you have current law in about two dozen countries (plus Florida, thanks "based" DeSantis!)
It's amazing, the one thing that unites both sides of the aisle is silencing men's ability to speak against their new masters.
#YesAllWomen
Edit :
Look who enforces it...
Dame Melanie Dawes joined Ofcom as an Executive Board Member and Chief Executive in March 2020.
There's that date again. Seems like women acquired a lot of power while people were scared of their failed bioweapon.
Prior to joining Ofcom, Melanie was Permanent Secretary at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government from 2015. She has held a range of senior roles across the Civil Service, working in partnership across the public and private sector, including as Champion for Civil Service Diversity and Inclusion.
It's a common question feminists ask men that disagree with them. It's similar to when was theast time you got laid or who hurt you or how small is your dick etc... It's meant to presume the only reason you could say what you've said is if you've got problems.
No, it does. It's actually worse than what I claimed, because they don't punish the user, they punish the company. Users could just go to platforms women wouldn't monitor, like here.
But by making it the company's problem...they basically make women's undeserved protection from criticism a necessary expense for all tech companies, no matter the size. This is the same kind of ridiculous thing you see in dictatorships, for instance in China, where all tech companies have to submit to the government for approval before they can operate with Chinese people's data. You might recall the heavy fines, and large fall in Tencent's stock price as a result, for not limiting the gaming time of Chinese children.
They have the nerve to talk about protecting people from Russia's anti-democracy ideas, while they plan to completely ban all speech against the ruling class.
As I said previously, the UK government is illegitimate. It's past time to file suit for persecution of the male sex.
The More Feminine Way is not a legitimate government.
they basically make women's undeserved protection from criticism
The law is about revenge porn. Not criticism. Dummy.
As I said previously, the UK government is illegitimate.
And as I said previously, you are a retard. You cited the Rome Statute which says nothing about governments being illegitimate. Although it is, because it protects grooming gangs!
It's past time to file suit for persecution of the male sex.
Yes, and the nice guards with black and pink swastika armbands are just taking you for a shower.
Speaking of swastika armbands, I'm surprised it wasn't Von Der Leyen who passed this. Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Geschlecht and all that.
"Revenge porn" (which isn't even a real crime, because if sex work is real work, why is telling your family your job such a problem?) is already illegal.
You cited the Rome Statute which says nothing about governments being illegitimate.
The Rome Statutes are the official guidelines of what constitutes a crime against humanity.
Yes, and the nice guards with black and pink swastika armbands are just taking you for a shower.
So your conspiracy theory is that the law is actually secretly about something other than what the law says?
"Revenge porn" (which isn't even a real crime, because if sex work is real work, why is telling your family your job such a problem?)
For one, because people have a right to not be exposed to explicit materials.
Secondly, telling OnlyFans thots' families that they are that, is not revenge porn. Revenge porn is recording your girlfriend, and then releasing nude or sexual images when she breaks up with you.
The Rome Statutes are the official guidelines of what constitutes a crime against humanity.
They're not 'official guidelines', they're just a treaty. And nowhere does it state that a government is illegitimate. You are nuts.
I'm mocking the fact that you can't see women's power following a close path to Nazi Germany. We're at the burning books stage of the More Feminine Reich.
Actually, sending a link to the OF materials of a whore to their family is revenge porn. Did you even check how they defined it?
They are the most official thing we have. Over 100 countries signed them.
I'm mocking the fact that you can't see women's power following a close path to Nazi Germany. We're at the burning books stage of the More Feminine Reich.
You are literally retarded.
Actually, sending a link to the OF materials of a whore to their family is revenge porn. Did you even check how they defined it?
Then show it instead of screaming impotently due to your dick being made out of the skin of your arm.
They are the most official thing we have. Over 100 countries signed them.
Nothing official about it, and it doesn't talk about illegitimate governments.
Replace "woman" with "jew" and "misogyny" with "antisemitism" and you have current law in about two dozen countries (plus Florida, thanks "based" DeSantis!)
The difference being that there has never been a mass genocide of women to make that necessary.
There's so much wrong with your statement I don't know where to begin.
If you genuinely believe the Chinese "genocide" of female babies, I don't know what to tell you.
Archive Link
It's amazing, the one thing that unites both sides of the aisle is silencing men's ability to speak against their new masters.
#YesAllWomen
Edit :
Look who enforces it...
There's that date again. Seems like women acquired a lot of power while people were scared of their failed bioweapon.
It's good. Weird question.
It's a common question feminists ask men that disagree with them. It's similar to when was theast time you got laid or who hurt you or how small is your dick etc... It's meant to presume the only reason you could say what you've said is if you've got problems.
Not really. Whenever I see a feminist, I think: DADDY ISSUES.
Bad parents raise bad people. Who knew?
Oh, I know that.
I was just mocking him/her.
So you looked it up and realized that the plan as it is doesn't do what you claimed? Good to know.
No, it does. It's actually worse than what I claimed, because they don't punish the user, they punish the company. Users could just go to platforms women wouldn't monitor, like here.
But by making it the company's problem...they basically make women's undeserved protection from criticism a necessary expense for all tech companies, no matter the size. This is the same kind of ridiculous thing you see in dictatorships, for instance in China, where all tech companies have to submit to the government for approval before they can operate with Chinese people's data. You might recall the heavy fines, and large fall in Tencent's stock price as a result, for not limiting the gaming time of Chinese children.
They have the nerve to talk about protecting people from Russia's anti-democracy ideas, while they plan to completely ban all speech against the ruling class.
As I said previously, the UK government is illegitimate. It's past time to file suit for persecution of the male sex.
The More Feminine Way is not a legitimate government.
Women are not our superiors.
The law is about revenge porn. Not criticism. Dummy.
And as I said previously, you are a retard. You cited the Rome Statute which says nothing about governments being illegitimate. Although it is, because it protects grooming gangs!
Always the victim.
A spider is your superior.
Yes, and the nice guards with black and pink swastika armbands are just taking you for a shower.
Speaking of swastika armbands, I'm surprised it wasn't Von Der Leyen who passed this. Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Geschlecht and all that.
"Revenge porn" (which isn't even a real crime, because if sex work is real work, why is telling your family your job such a problem?) is already illegal.
The Rome Statutes are the official guidelines of what constitutes a crime against humanity.
So your conspiracy theory is that the law is actually secretly about something other than what the law says?
For one, because people have a right to not be exposed to explicit materials.
Secondly, telling OnlyFans thots' families that they are that, is not revenge porn. Revenge porn is recording your girlfriend, and then releasing nude or sexual images when she breaks up with you.
They're not 'official guidelines', they're just a treaty. And nowhere does it state that a government is illegitimate. You are nuts.
I'm mocking the fact that you can't see women's power following a close path to Nazi Germany. We're at the burning books stage of the More Feminine Reich.
Actually, sending a link to the OF materials of a whore to their family is revenge porn. Did you even check how they defined it?
They are the most official thing we have. Over 100 countries signed them.
You are literally retarded.
Then show it instead of screaming impotently due to your dick being made out of the skin of your arm.
Nothing official about it, and it doesn't talk about illegitimate governments.
No, I'm not. Censoring all criticism of them is the equivalent of book burning in the modern era.
That theory is retarded.
You're really arguing semantics here. A government charged with crimes against humanity is obviously illegitimate.