Because even stepping out of line just a bit (you dont have to say something extreme like "kill all niggers", you could literally say some shit like " I dont think kids should transition"), and thats enough for you to get shunned and shit on by twitter lefties. Leftists cant tell the difference between your average stormfront user, a normal trump-voting conservative, and a person who just wants to grill. That is because to leftists, everyone who isnt them is all the same. Leftists like to say that "One side wants equality, and one side wants to kill all black people", but even questioning things like anti-white shit in media is enough to get you labelled as the side that "wants to kill all black people". Sorry for pointing out the obvious, I just wanted to share my thoughts. That is because I saw a leftists on a website the other day saying shit like "centrists are blocking the path to true equality and are no better than white supremacists", and that leftiism is the only moral rational way.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Except, whoops, Paul condemns degenerate sexual behavior in Corinthians and Romans.
No surprise you didn't know that.
So then your argument is that they're not animals?
In which case their inestimably vile behavior is willful. Thus contemptible.
Duh. Paul wouldn't take a hammer to anyone's knees. He wasn't a psycho like you.
You don't just hate blacks who do show 'inestimably vile behavior', but blacks in general. You didn't answer if they have an immortal soul or not. Nor where Paul labeled Jews heretics, nor whether you LARP as a Catholic.
Take part in punishing the wicked? Tell me you didn't read Romans without telling me you didn't read Romans.
In point of fact by your definition he was by far more of a psycho than you claim I am.
Does God hate sin?
Nor will I, because you're asking things that are not relevant and you're just seeking an avenue to move the goalposts. It doesn't even matter whether blacks have souls, because the correct response to either case is the same.
It's not a non sequitur, answer the question.
Quite ironic, as Paul explicitly states that "some of you" also engaged in such sins. Clearly, he did not break their knees, like your Reichschurch version of Paul.
Non sequitur.
And that is answer enough. Not that it wasn't obvious already. You were blatantly lying about Paul calling Jews heretic, and you certainly are no Catholic.
LOL! That is a question for you? Wow. You are a self-parody.