"These words only encourage those at the rally to march to the Capitol — nothing more — and do not address legality at all. But, although his express words only mention walking down Pennsylvania Avenue to the Capitol, one might conclude that the context implies that he was urging protestors to do something more — perhaps to enter the Capitol building and stop the certification," Bates wrote.
aha. got it. It's not the words he actually used that are evidence of his crimes, it's the things he specifically didn't say that are the actual evidence.
It's insulting that they're not making a better attempt here. Why not just fabricate something better than this mealy-mouthed trash? It's not like the media (or the Biden administration) is above that...
one might conclude that the context implies that he was urging protestors to do something more — perhaps to enter the Capitol building and stop the certification," Bates wrote.
One might conclude that, but one would be reaching and your decision, judgie-wudgie, is not to be based on inference but on explicit facts.
aha. got it. It's not the words he actually used that are evidence of his crimes, it's the things he specifically didn't say that are the actual evidence.
"One might conclude"
"Context implies"
"Perhaps"
It's insulting that they're not making a better attempt here. Why not just fabricate something better than this mealy-mouthed trash? It's not like the media (or the Biden administration) is above that...
“Sources familiar with his thinking.”
They already impeached him twice over what they claimed he was thinking. This is just them saying "third time's the charm!"
One might conclude that, but one would be reaching and your decision, judgie-wudgie, is not to be based on inference but on explicit facts.