GoOgLe iS a fAiR aNd uNbIaSeD SeArCh EnGiNe
(media.scored.co)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Why not? The wikpedia source will just be the ADL anyway.
I totally believe Google would artificially boost ADL.
On the other hand, I feel like a lot of people are just not clicking on wikipedia because they've lost so much credibility.
And somehow the fucking ADL has the most credibility on the web?
To the left, yes. The ADL gives them credence to attack others they don't like, wikipedia just gossips.
Once I googled "John Walker Flynt" and it told me that the results weren't reliable because it couldn't find any sources that didn't cover up the truth about him. I posted about it here:
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/140c9RA5Du/when-goolag-cant-find-any-propag/c/
Meanwhile on Brave Search.
Nice
Part of the problem is that companies as big and powerful as Google shouldn't be permitted (ever) to have proprietary algorithms that manipulate people. It needs to be open sourced
To be fair, whilst I am dubious about Google's impartiality, downranking Wikipedia is probably one of their more defensible positions ...
I mean, f*ck Wikipedia.