62
Comments (53)
sorted by:
29
Assassin47 29 points ago +29 / -0

Kek I'm surprised they still let him do polls.

17
32
SturmMilfEnthusiast 32 points ago +32 / -0

Elon materially aided Ukraine by sending them Starlink modems, and they're gonna lean into this liberal Two Minutes Hate shit because of an internet poll? These stupid faggots deserve everything Russia can do to them and more.

20
AntonioOfVenice 20 points ago +20 / -0

Labour politician calls for sanctions of Elon: https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1664822106140361.jpg

Wow, it's real.

I'd say you should make this a separate post, because it's that egregious.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +5 / -8

Hmm, I think it's a good idea...

Mostly because it'll slow down the EV cult.

14
AntonioOfVenice 14 points ago +14 / -0

EV cult isn't going anywhere though. They can't provide enough electricity as it is, let alone the batteries necessary.

3
TheImpossible1 3 points ago +7 / -4

Maybe that's the point. Ban the alternatives so you can't escape whatever is coming.

Only a loyal servant of feminism will be allowed an EV. Everyone else will have to walk.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

They won't be able to ban the alternatives. Not when it's such a mess.

But you are correct in one sense: the ruling classes seem to try hard to make us poorer.

4
current_horror 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s a managed decline. They can’t come out and tell you that they plan to deindustrialize your nations and redistribute your quality of life to the third world. Globalists have to come at you sideways. Make fossil fuels illegal, then shrink the economies until wildly insufficient “green energy” suddenly, magically covers your needs.

2
WhitePhoenix 2 points ago +3 / -1

How are you two being nice to each other here then you slap each other with your shriveled dicks in other threads.

You two are weird.

1
FutaCumDiet 1 point ago +1 / -0

We could if people were psyop'd into think every nuclear reactor is a thermonuclear warhead in waiting.

0
WhitePhoenix 0 points ago +1 / -1

One who supports neither you faggot.

23
AntonioOfVenice 23 points ago +24 / -1

no Ukrainian will EVER buy your f...ing tesla crap

Unless Russia sweeps in and makes you way richer, you couldn't afford it, baby.

By the way, this jackass is the Little Russia ambassador to Germany. The arrogance and entitlement of this shithole corrupt non-country is just off the charts.

15
ailurus 15 points ago +15 / -0

Funny thing about that is, aren't a good number of people in Ukraine using his Starlink internet since the invasion began? I know he donated a bunch of stuff for Starlink to them last Spring.

3
zakat 3 points ago +3 / -0

By the way, this jackass is the Little Russia ambassador to Germany.

Nah, he got removed from that position, because of one of too many retarded takes.
The final one was denying that far-right Ukranian Bandera was part in killing hundreds of thousands of Jews.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol, that's this guy?

3
Assassin47 3 points ago +3 / -0

I do remember one time seeing photos of a famous Ukrainian ethot who owned a Tesla. But most Ukrainians maybe not.

2
when_we_win_remember 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Ukrainians have enough problems without the service record of a Tesla. These guys need a Hilux not a luxury car

20
SoctaticMethod1 20 points ago +20 / -0

Ok, a very well thought out, reasonable analysis of what the most likely future in this war is...

...and the war shills scream they're boycotting, predictable. I really can't wait to see if that lawsuit goes Elon's way and Twitter gets nuked from orbit by shareholder lawsuits.

8
Brennus 8 points ago +8 / -0

Boycotting a car company….. maybe I’m in the minority but I try to not buy cars all that frequently. I want to get 10-15 years or more out of a car before needing to replace it. So if you are not immediately in the market for a car how will the company feel the effect of a boycott? Like do they imagine in 8 years they are still going to be upset over Elon suggesting an end of a war that many of them are not involved in? It’s like if I vocally stated I’m boycotting Bugatti. I’ve never bought a car made by Bugatti, I’m not in the tax bracket that can afford a Bugatti, but somehow I’m going to boycott Bugatti. I know Tesla is significantly more affordable, but cars are not products bought at a high enough frequency where a boycott would be very noticeable.

6
Hand_Of_Node 6 points ago +7 / -1

Who are the war shills? I think the SMO was a mistake, and Russia should have decapitated the elensky regime before sweeping across Ukraine with unstoppable force.

Putin was morally obligated to do that in 2014 after the US state department jew-coup, when Ukraine began torture-murders of ethnic Russians, and gloatingly posting them online.

2
current_horror 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe you’re right. I will give Putin this: his restraint in this conflict has given western media a lot of rope to hang itself.

6
current_horror 6 points ago +6 / -0

They refuse to entertain any outcome that does not involve the total destruction of the current government of Russia.

So when Putin says that current western policy represents an existential threat to the continued survival of his government, he’s telling the truth.

5
NoEyesNoGroin 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's a reasonable conclusion but it's based on a premise that's very unlikely (Putin mobilising country for total war). Which isn't surprising, Musk is an engineer not a general or geostrategist. Apparently now in the West merely having a single slightly divergent view to the regime narrative will get you threatened with state violence.

14
rantanon9145 14 points ago +14 / -0

Redo elections under UN supervision

Aka under US supervision. To join/remain in Russia. What could possibly go wrong?

1
GimmeFuelGimmeFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most secure fortification since 2020

14
ailurus 14 points ago +14 / -0

Personally, think it is a very good analysis and proposal.

12
MagnumRabbits 12 points ago +12 / -0
  1. Non-starter for Russia. Russian trust for the UN is slightly higher than NATO, which is a long way of saying it's near non-existent.

  2. Non-starter for Ukraine. Crimea is a very strategic geographic location. Having Russia there means that Ukraine will always have to contend with a potential invasion. Also, Crimea's ports are very valuable, so that's nice.

  3. Non-starter for Ukraine. Essentially would be seen as supplying the enemy. Which given the practicality of the peninsula for an invasion force, means Ukraine's fears aren't unfounded.

  4. Non-starter for the West. Ukraine has way too many "business deals" that can remain clean by Ukrainian standards but would be absolutely corrupt and dirty by any Western standard. Too much money would be lost in the West and too many investors are demanding a return on investment.

The longer the war goes and the more money the West sinks into Ukraine, the less likely Ukraine will remain neutral after the war (should Ukraine gain an upper hand). The only way the West will disengage is if Russia wins a decisive victory. How that will look remains to be seen, if it will be seen at all.

5
JustHereForTheSalmon 5 points ago +5 / -0

I presume that when the Donbas region votes to no longer be part of Ukraine they'll be happy to buy a Tesla.

4
GeneralBoobs 4 points ago +4 / -0

With any luck there will be nothing but a Ukrainian ethnicity and no longer a state within the end of the year.

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here we are on the brink of nuclear war, with the US leading the boycott of peace negotiations to fatten our munitions corporations (we are, after all, a Fascist state now), and a reluctant American oligarch proposes a negotiation that really isn't at all unfair, irrational, or impossible, and he is shit on for his comment.

Once Ukraine is accepted into NATO, the missiles will fly and we are well and truly fucked.

1
GimmeFuelGimmeFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm an actual fascist and I assure you that the Brandon regime is not real fascism. Real fascism has never been tried. Read theory

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about a definition?

-14
TheImpossible1 -14 points ago +2 / -16

Look at the Von Der Leyen puppet.

I don't trust either of them.

15
CatoTheElder 15 points ago +16 / -1

Are you seriously this deranged? His proposal is the exact opposite of what the EU wants. If anyone is a puppet of von der Leyen, it's Zelansky who would never consider this acceptable.

5
CarmenOfSandiego 5 points ago +5 / -0

[Is Imp] seriously this deranged?

Yes. /thread

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +3 / -6

I'm talking about the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany.

As for Musk, I wouldn't trust him if he personally gave me a million dollars.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +4 / -2

What about a million dollars and a Ferrari?

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +3 / -5

Nope. Nothing would make me trust Elon.

After all, radical feminist manifestos (for example, the SCUM Manifesto) state they will automate away the jobs women won't do - guess who is building humanoid machines?

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +4 / -1

Nope. Nothing would make me trust Elon.

I don't trust WOMEN!

After all, radical feminist manifestos (for example, the SCUM Manifesto) state they will automate away the jobs women won't do - guess who is building humanoid machines?

Man, you just spend your days thinking of ways to scare and terrify yourself.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +4 / -5

Elon associated with Amber Heard, another red flag.

SpaceX and Tesla still receive government cash as of Biden becoming President.

EVs are clearly part of the More Feminine Way, and he worked to normalize the horrid things.

4
Mpetey123 4 points ago +4 / -0

I too would "associate" with Amber Heard. I'd also "associate" with Alyssia Milano and "associate" to AOC. I wouldn't vote like them or listen to them but "associate" with them absolutely

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +3 / -1

By what mechanism is Von der Leyen puppeteering him?

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Ukrainian Ambassador to Germany.

Who was Defence Minister of Germany a while ago?

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +3 / -1

OK, so just to be clear, you think that the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany reports to the former Defense Minister of Germany?

Let no man claim that you are not funny as hell.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

I am 99% sure that as their posts overlapped in time period, that they have met.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

If Imp is 99% sure that someone "has met" Von der Leyen, that establishes that she is puppeteering him.

1
zakat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Former Ukrainian Ambassador to Germany

1
SR388-SAX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why on Earth would your "trust" of Elon Musk have anything to do with him putting out a proposal and a poll? Do you think Twitter polls are binding by international law or something?

Or did you just want another excuse to turn an unrelated thread into another off-topic exhibition of your insane paranoia?