This is another thing I would never understand.
All the polyamorous relationships I see in clips usually involve several guys and one woman or a couple of women and several guys. I can't understand a guy that is ok with other guys having sex with the women you love, this applies to open relationships as well.
I understand the idea of sleeping around without an emotional implication but they claim love here. How is this a thing?
On a related note, women tend to be extremely jealous so how do mormons manage several wives without having them poison each other?
I understand the idea of sleeping around without an emotional implication but they claim love here. How is this a thing?
I strongly believe that poly people don't understand what love is. They experience a shallow form of it. Romantic love involves finite psychological/emotional resources. So when they say they love all of their partners, it's kind of like children playing house, except wretched instead of cute.
Source: I had a close call with falling for that bullshit myself, before figuring it out. Poly is highly attractive to people who don't want to commit to a single partner. They don't find satisfaction with a single partner because they don't know the trials and rewards of a serious monogamous romance. They think that a shallow connection to another human being is sufficient because they aren't even really concerned with a lifelong partnership; if one person dies or leaves, it's like a pet dog dying or running away, kind of sad for a few months but then you get a new dog.
tl;dr: romantic love is defined by willing exclusivity and cannot exist without monogamy - other forms of love exist, but they are not romantic love.
Romantic love is bullshit from movies. It doesn't exist.
immediately followed by ...
Your lizard brain is drugging you into feeling it so you make a baby.
So it doesn't exist, but even though it doesn't exist it's only a thing because your brain forces you to feel it.
What a stupid fucking statement. Everything we "feel" is just our brains drugging us into it. I'm only hungry because my brain tells me. I'm only tired because my brain tells me. I'm only thirsty because my brain tells me. I'm only angry or happy or sad because my brain tells me. Therefore none of those things exist because it's just my brain sending electrochemical signals to my body.
(Yes, I'm aware that there that other organs are capable of signaling stuff through other electrochemical processes. It doesn't change the argument.)
How do you explain poly among a group of homosexual males?
I could potentially accept an argument that romantic love is not worth pursuing, but not an argument that it doesn't exist. I can even accept your premise that it's just a bunch of brain chemical drug effects caused by evolutionary psychology, but that doesn't make it stop resulting in a distinct cognitive state (a feeling, if you will). Unless you're suggesting that such states should all be stripped of their labels and we disregard all feelings as "lizard brain" trickery.
This is another thing I would never understand. All the polyamorous relationships I see in clips usually involve several guys and one woman or a couple of women and several guys. I can't understand a guy that is ok with other guys having sex with the women you love, this applies to open relationships as well. I understand the idea of sleeping around without an emotional implication but they claim love here. How is this a thing?
On a related note, women tend to be extremely jealous so how do mormons manage several wives without having them poison each other?
I strongly believe that poly people don't understand what love is. They experience a shallow form of it. Romantic love involves finite psychological/emotional resources. So when they say they love all of their partners, it's kind of like children playing house, except wretched instead of cute.
Source: I had a close call with falling for that bullshit myself, before figuring it out. Poly is highly attractive to people who don't want to commit to a single partner. They don't find satisfaction with a single partner because they don't know the trials and rewards of a serious monogamous romance. They think that a shallow connection to another human being is sufficient because they aren't even really concerned with a lifelong partnership; if one person dies or leaves, it's like a pet dog dying or running away, kind of sad for a few months but then you get a new dog.
tl;dr: romantic love is defined by willing exclusivity and cannot exist without monogamy - other forms of love exist, but they are not romantic love.
Romantic love is bullshit from movies. It doesn't exist. Your lizard brain is drugging you into feeling it so you make a baby.
Poly is women trying to exploit broken men to double their simp bucks.
immediately followed by ...
So it doesn't exist, but even though it doesn't exist it's only a thing because your brain forces you to feel it.
What a stupid fucking statement. Everything we "feel" is just our brains drugging us into it. I'm only hungry because my brain tells me. I'm only tired because my brain tells me. I'm only thirsty because my brain tells me. I'm only angry or happy or sad because my brain tells me. Therefore none of those things exist because it's just my brain sending electrochemical signals to my body.
(Yes, I'm aware that there that other organs are capable of signaling stuff through other electrochemical processes. It doesn't change the argument.)
How do you explain poly among a group of homosexual males?
I could potentially accept an argument that romantic love is not worth pursuing, but not an argument that it doesn't exist. I can even accept your premise that it's just a bunch of brain chemical drug effects caused by evolutionary psychology, but that doesn't make it stop resulting in a distinct cognitive state (a feeling, if you will). Unless you're suggesting that such states should all be stripped of their labels and we disregard all feelings as "lizard brain" trickery.