And blacks remain stupid even when taken and raised in white countries: US SAT scores: "Of those scoring above 700, 43% are Asian and 45% are white, compared to 6% Hispanic or Latino and 1% Black."
I read some study, I can't pull it up on google from memory with the effort I'm willing to make for this comment, that basically said that even though you took blacks from sub saharan africa and raised them in the US, even if adopted by white parents, they still showed a substantially lower IQ.
IQ isn't entirely genetic, but a lot of it is genetic. Genetics defines the potential. You can fail to reach your potential for other reasons as well. North Koreans are probably dumber than South Koreans for the same reason they're short: poor nutrition.
Nope. On average, white people are smarter than black people.
I can't pull it up on google from memory with the effort I'm willing to make for this comment, that basically said that even though you took blacks from sub saharan africa and raised them in the US, even if adopted by white parents, they still showed a substantially lower IQ.
There's also the children of black American soldiers in Germany, who were no smarter or dumber than the children of white soldiers. However, this evidence is contested because the army has IQ tests for its recruits.
IQ isn't entirely genetic, but a lot of it is genetic
Nearly all of it is, and the rest of it is unshared environment - mostly the product of development. Environment makes close to 0 difference, at least unless you starve your kid.
Nope. On average, white people are smarter than black people.
Yes that's what I wrote. I just didn't include the pathetic little disclaimer language because I do not insult the intelligence of my reader by assuming they are so stupid as to assume I would be making the statement that "the dumbest white person on earth is still smarter than the smartest black person". That is not what I wrote. You would have to change what I wrote.
Are you going to object to a statement like "Men are taller than women"? Because they are. The fact that you feel the need to inject qualifications that are really not necessary to dance and tiptoe comes across as cucked. It's not my responsibility if someone wants to attribute an absurd interpretation of my words.
There's also the children of black American soldiers in Germany, who were no smarter or dumber than the children of white soldiers.
Black Americans themselves are often mixed race.
The kids of blacks in germany would necessarily be at least 50% white, and possibly as much as 75% white. So their characteristics tell you nothing about the genetics of blacks. The fact that german women fucked them and lighter skin is seen as more attractive, might mean that the fathers were more mixed than usual.
This isn't a randomized group. The "blacks" involved had to be smart enough to convince german women to fuck them.
sample size was super low, with only 98 mixed race kids.
The mixed race kids did actually have lower IQ: 96.5. The white boys had 101, and the white girls, strangely, had 93. Considering how tiny the sample was, it would have only taken a few outlier white girls to throw off the results.
The only reason anyone talks about that shitty low quality German study is that it suits their biases and tells them what they want to hear. Liberals lose their fucking minds at the suggestion that blacks are genetically inferior to whites. They CANNOT accept that, no matter how clear the evidence. So they attack anyone who dares to speak the truth, and drive them out of academia and destroy their careers and screech that they are racists and white supremacists. No. Just because a true fact lends itself to use by racists and white supremacists, does not make that fact itself racist. Facts are just facts. Denying the truth because it is inconvenient to your ideology, to me, is heinous, and is one of the reasons I hate leftism so much.
I just didn't include the pathetic little disclaimer language because I do not insult the intelligence of my reader
It's just a false statement.
That is not what I wrote. You would have to change what I wrote.
It is what you wrote. Yours was a categorical statement. If X are more A than Y, then all members of X are more A than Y. If stars are bigger than planets, then no one in his right mind is going to conclude that the average star is bigger than the average planet.
You now try to change it.
Are you going to object to a statement like "Men are taller than women"? Because they are.
No, men are on average taller than women.
Black Americans themselves are often mixed race.
And those mixed race ones are often the ones who were set free earlier, leaving them more free early on to have access to the dominant culture (which back then was actually good), as TS points out.
The kids of blacks in germany would necessarily be at least 50% white, and possibly as much as 75% white. So their characteristics tell you nothing about the genetics of blacks.
Actually, it does - because you'd be able to see the effect of the 25% that you assert. If someone with 100% black genes is on average N IQ points less smart, then someone with 50% should have N/2, and 25% N/4, on average.
And in fact, James Flynn argues that the part-blacks in Germany flourished because there was no ruined black subculture there
The fact that german women fucked them and lighter skin is seen as more attractive, might mean that the fathers were more mixed than usual.
'Lighter skin' is not seen as more attractive in Europe. Nor in the US. People work hard to get my skin tone.
The only reason anyone talks about that shitty low quality German study is that it suits their biases and tells them what they want to hear.
And also because basically any study of race and IQ is confounded by other variables, even before it was completely put a stop to due to political correctness.
Liberals lose their fucking minds at the suggestion that blacks are genetically inferior to whites.
People who have a somewhat lower IQ are not 'inferior'. Only liberals define their self-worth by self-congratulating themselves about their supposed intelligence.
Just because a true fact lends itself to use by racists and white supremacists, does not make that fact itself racist. Facts are just facts. Denying the truth because it is inconvenient to your ideology, to me, is heinous, and is one of the reasons I hate leftism so much.
Agreed. I think that it is highly likely that there are IQ differences resulting from race. But I do think you exaggerate. It may not account for the entire current difference that is measured.
No, you're wrong. Qualifications are not needed. I get that english is not your first language, so don't argue semantics with me.
If stars are bigger than planets, then no one in his right mind is going to conclude that the average star is bigger than the average planet.
And therein lies your mental defect: you presume to dictate how a statement ought to be interpreted, and you are, of course, wrong. "Stars are bigger than planets" is a generally true statement. The fact that a person can find 1 example of the biggest planet being bigger than the smallest star does not invalidate that statement. You would need to say "ALL stars are bigger than ALL planets" for the statement to be absolute as you presume.
Actually, it does - because you'd be able to see the effect of the 25% that you assert. If someone with 100% black genes is on average N IQ points less smart, then someone with 50% should have N/2, and 25% N/4, on average.
No, that is completely wrong. Genetics does not work in a linear fashion like that.
'Lighter skin' is not seen as more attractive in Europe. Nor in the US.
It is with blacks. When you look at blacks seen as attractive in both the US and Europe, they are always mixed race, not the dark black sub saharan africans. Halle Berry looks nothing like a sub saharan african, for example. The fact that white people might tan does not invalidate this. Apples and oranges.
People who have a somewhat lower IQ are not 'inferior'.
Of course they are, by definition.
Only liberals define their self-worth by self-congratulating themselves about their supposed intelligence.
No, you are a socialist, and liberals/leftists are also socialists. You and they agree on this point. It's a communist point, that everyone is equal, even though they are very clearly not.
But I do think you exaggerate. It may not account for the entire current difference that is measured.
I didn't suggest that it accounted for everything. There is, however, SOME clear difference that is not allowed to be spoken about.
White people are smarter than black people.
And blacks remain stupid even when taken and raised in white countries: US SAT scores: "Of those scoring above 700, 43% are Asian and 45% are white, compared to 6% Hispanic or Latino and 1% Black."
I read some study, I can't pull it up on google from memory with the effort I'm willing to make for this comment, that basically said that even though you took blacks from sub saharan africa and raised them in the US, even if adopted by white parents, they still showed a substantially lower IQ.
IQ isn't entirely genetic, but a lot of it is genetic. Genetics defines the potential. You can fail to reach your potential for other reasons as well. North Koreans are probably dumber than South Koreans for the same reason they're short: poor nutrition.
Nope. On average, white people are smarter than black people.
There's also the children of black American soldiers in Germany, who were no smarter or dumber than the children of white soldiers. However, this evidence is contested because the army has IQ tests for its recruits.
Nearly all of it is, and the rest of it is unshared environment - mostly the product of development. Environment makes close to 0 difference, at least unless you starve your kid.
Yes that's what I wrote. I just didn't include the pathetic little disclaimer language because I do not insult the intelligence of my reader by assuming they are so stupid as to assume I would be making the statement that "the dumbest white person on earth is still smarter than the smartest black person". That is not what I wrote. You would have to change what I wrote.
Are you going to object to a statement like "Men are taller than women"? Because they are. The fact that you feel the need to inject qualifications that are really not necessary to dance and tiptoe comes across as cucked. It's not my responsibility if someone wants to attribute an absurd interpretation of my words.
Black Americans themselves are often mixed race.
The kids of blacks in germany would necessarily be at least 50% white, and possibly as much as 75% white. So their characteristics tell you nothing about the genetics of blacks. The fact that german women fucked them and lighter skin is seen as more attractive, might mean that the fathers were more mixed than usual.
This isn't a randomized group. The "blacks" involved had to be smart enough to convince german women to fuck them.
sample size was super low, with only 98 mixed race kids.
The mixed race kids did actually have lower IQ: 96.5. The white boys had 101, and the white girls, strangely, had 93. Considering how tiny the sample was, it would have only taken a few outlier white girls to throw off the results.
There are lots and lots of superior studies with much bigger samples in the US. Discussed in detail here: https://web.archive.org/web/20151103215722/http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
The only reason anyone talks about that shitty low quality German study is that it suits their biases and tells them what they want to hear. Liberals lose their fucking minds at the suggestion that blacks are genetically inferior to whites. They CANNOT accept that, no matter how clear the evidence. So they attack anyone who dares to speak the truth, and drive them out of academia and destroy their careers and screech that they are racists and white supremacists. No. Just because a true fact lends itself to use by racists and white supremacists, does not make that fact itself racist. Facts are just facts. Denying the truth because it is inconvenient to your ideology, to me, is heinous, and is one of the reasons I hate leftism so much.
It's just a false statement.
It is what you wrote. Yours was a categorical statement. If X are more A than Y, then all members of X are more A than Y. If stars are bigger than planets, then no one in his right mind is going to conclude that the average star is bigger than the average planet.
You now try to change it.
No, men are on average taller than women.
And those mixed race ones are often the ones who were set free earlier, leaving them more free early on to have access to the dominant culture (which back then was actually good), as TS points out.
Actually, it does - because you'd be able to see the effect of the 25% that you assert. If someone with 100% black genes is on average N IQ points less smart, then someone with 50% should have N/2, and 25% N/4, on average.
And in fact, James Flynn argues that the part-blacks in Germany flourished because there was no ruined black subculture there
'Lighter skin' is not seen as more attractive in Europe. Nor in the US. People work hard to get my skin tone.
And also because basically any study of race and IQ is confounded by other variables, even before it was completely put a stop to due to political correctness.
People who have a somewhat lower IQ are not 'inferior'. Only liberals define their self-worth by self-congratulating themselves about their supposed intelligence.
Agreed. I think that it is highly likely that there are IQ differences resulting from race. But I do think you exaggerate. It may not account for the entire current difference that is measured.
No, you're wrong. Qualifications are not needed. I get that english is not your first language, so don't argue semantics with me.
And therein lies your mental defect: you presume to dictate how a statement ought to be interpreted, and you are, of course, wrong. "Stars are bigger than planets" is a generally true statement. The fact that a person can find 1 example of the biggest planet being bigger than the smallest star does not invalidate that statement. You would need to say "ALL stars are bigger than ALL planets" for the statement to be absolute as you presume.
No, that is completely wrong. Genetics does not work in a linear fashion like that.
It is with blacks. When you look at blacks seen as attractive in both the US and Europe, they are always mixed race, not the dark black sub saharan africans. Halle Berry looks nothing like a sub saharan african, for example. The fact that white people might tan does not invalidate this. Apples and oranges.
Of course they are, by definition.
No, you are a socialist, and liberals/leftists are also socialists. You and they agree on this point. It's a communist point, that everyone is equal, even though they are very clearly not.
I didn't suggest that it accounted for everything. There is, however, SOME clear difference that is not allowed to be spoken about.