Do these people want the Bill of Rights incorporated to the states or not?
At the founding, every state had some sort of official religion, mostly Anglican or Congregationalist, through either explicitly writing it into the constitution or other explicit legal protections. If progressives want their religion to be exclusive within a state, then other states can similarly declare a different official religion. If progressives want no official state religions, then they have to treat all institutions equally, including those that reject the progressive religion.
Obviously, what they really want is to nullify the establishment clause by pretending they don't subscribe to any theology despite their many metaphysical declarations in order to force a federal religion, but that is a bullshit rhetorical trick.
Calling wokism a religion is doing it too much honor. I realize not everyone here is as fond of religion, but it's an indisputable fact that both Europe and America had their apex under the tutelage of the Christian religion. Wokism cannot create something so great, it can only co-opt and wreck the thing. It's a cult, a perversion of the religious instinct.
That's all true, but in terms of autistic legalism they would certainly qualify as a religion. People are also incapable of escaping their confessional heritage, which results in it becoming a grotesque mockery of Christianity. Ideally, they would be ruthlessly repressed by all western nations formally restoring some flavor of proper Christianity while purging the progressive elements that have infiltrated them, such as Vatican II for the Catholics, the ELCA for Lutherans, whatever is going on with the Anglicans, etc.
Thank your for showing some autistic legalism representation. I see relegion as essentially pre-packaged philosophy with an instructional support system of buildings and titles.
I have worked to expand my exposure to differing philosophical teachings as I get older. Surprisingly, after a decade of following the hedonism of Aristippu, I am now properly appreciating the power of Christianity through the teachings of Thomas Aquinas. Certainly a more fulfilling approach to existence.
Physical pleasure is fleeting. Personal development of body and environment is eternal.
Do these people want the Bill of Rights incorporated to the states or not?
At the founding, every state had some sort of official religion, mostly Anglican or Congregationalist, through either explicitly writing it into the constitution or other explicit legal protections. If progressives want their religion to be exclusive within a state, then other states can similarly declare a different official religion. If progressives want no official state religions, then they have to treat all institutions equally, including those that reject the progressive religion.
Obviously, what they really want is to nullify the establishment clause by pretending they don't subscribe to any theology despite their many metaphysical declarations in order to force a federal religion, but that is a bullshit rhetorical trick.
Calling wokism a religion is doing it too much honor. I realize not everyone here is as fond of religion, but it's an indisputable fact that both Europe and America had their apex under the tutelage of the Christian religion. Wokism cannot create something so great, it can only co-opt and wreck the thing. It's a cult, a perversion of the religious instinct.
That's all true, but in terms of autistic legalism they would certainly qualify as a religion. People are also incapable of escaping their confessional heritage, which results in it becoming a grotesque mockery of Christianity. Ideally, they would be ruthlessly repressed by all western nations formally restoring some flavor of proper Christianity while purging the progressive elements that have infiltrated them, such as Vatican II for the Catholics, the ELCA for Lutherans, whatever is going on with the Anglicans, etc.
Thank your for showing some autistic legalism representation. I see relegion as essentially pre-packaged philosophy with an instructional support system of buildings and titles.
I have worked to expand my exposure to differing philosophical teachings as I get older. Surprisingly, after a decade of following the hedonism of Aristippu, I am now properly appreciating the power of Christianity through the teachings of Thomas Aquinas. Certainly a more fulfilling approach to existence.
Physical pleasure is fleeting. Personal development of body and environment is eternal.