69
Comments (22)
sorted by:
21
Kaarous 21 points ago +21 / -0

When I still bothered talking to liberals, it was always funny to remind them that their ideas came from child torturing pedophiles. The faces they'd make until their pseudo brain rebooted and they simply called me a Nazi were beyond amusing.

Never actually changed any of their minds about their warped political beliefs. That's how I came to the conclusion that it was a waste of breath talking to liberals.

20
xleb2 20 points ago +20 / -0

paedophilia (a "chronophilia") was merely "a love affair between an age-discrepant couple"

Age Discrepant Couple

We have reached peak English language dismemberment. Cover-up the child sex crime with language discombobulation.

10
Steampunk_Moustache 10 points ago +10 / -0

informed consent is super important, until they want to have sex with a 4 year old, and its ok to trade anal sex for chocolate bars.

8
FuckGenderPolitics 8 points ago +8 / -0

I hate to be pedantic but I think enthusiastic consent is what you're referring to. They don't care about informed consent anymore because it's an obstacle to them forcing medical procedures on unwilling people just like the Nazis they won't stop screaming about. But maybe it is more appropriate for the example you gave. The left stopped giving a shit about enthusiastic consent when the trancels started demanding the right to prey on normal people.

8
JustHereForTheSalmon 8 points ago +8 / -0

I laughed when The Simpsons referred to a meltdown as an "unrequested fission surplus" but it's a very unfunny vision of the future.

2
lapalapa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, this ain't the peak, chief.

11
SupremeReader 11 points ago +11 / -0

I remember how Money was placed on New Zealand's official "Heroes" list. I think it was still up after David Reimer khs in 2012.

10
BlightBane 10 points ago +10 / -0

"What is a Woman" also featured these two demons.

9
ParadigmShift2070 9 points ago +11 / -2

Est, although money failed early life check, he might as well be honorary

5
realerfunction 5 points ago +5 / -0

neither of them should have died of old age.

3
TakenusernameA 3 points ago +3 / -0

They should have been forcibly kept alive on iron lungs and had a fresh batch of hydrogen peroxide pumped through their veins every day.

4
subbookkeeper 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a good summary, saved for my personal archive.

3
TakenusernameA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to mention all the ones in Germany funny moustache man kindly took care of.

-11
TheImpossible1 -11 points ago +3 / -14

This is false. Money's work was extremely obscure until his feminist understudy took it to the media and Sally Miller Gearhart ("The male population must be reduced to 10%") took it into academia.

All downvoters are pedophiles and feminist sympathizing cuckolds who will be put against the wall by the very same feminists they're defending.

8
SR388-SAX 8 points ago +9 / -1

Money's work was extremely obscure

So it's the basis for the current obsession with transgenderism, but because it was initially obscure, it's not responsible.

Hint: Isaac Newton discovered calculus but it was pretty fucking obscure during his day. In fact, most things in academia start out as obscure until they get wider exposure.

All downvoters are pedophiles.

No, you're just a fucking moron. Go watch some more XBox videos and whine about your boring ass mainstream video games.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +3 / -5

That's not what I said and you know it. The idea of blaming solely Money is purely to avoid the uncomfortable truth that transgenderism was popularized by male genocide advocates. Feminists in the media also went to great lengths to silence criticism of his work, because of how important it was to feminism.

Can you guess why it might be important for people to avoid that fact? Maybe that said genocide advocates might have far more power than was believed at first...

#MoreFeminineWay


This community was originally about games, so I'm not sure what you're going for here.

2
LibertyPrimeWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you’re missing the point. When it comes to popularizing it, maybe feminists deserve the blame, maybe Jews deserve the blame, maybe pedos or leftists or marxists or whoever you want deserve the blame. When you focus on implementation to the exclusion of origin, however, as you are, you actually remove a lot of the contextual information—and in this case, horrifying truth—from the idea itself.

It doesn’t matter that John Money didn’t popularize his work, what matters is that some sick group of people have popularized the disgusting work of a depraved pedophile.

6
ernsithe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Assuming that's true, it's kind of like saying Marx was just a guy writing a manifesto and it wasn't until politicians tried to implement his retardation was the real damage done. It's accurate but it doesn't absolve him from his role.

3
redman012 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is false. Money's work was extremely obscure until his feminist understudy took it to the media and Sally Miller Gearhart ("The male population must be reduced to 10%") took it into academia.

Sauce? Genuinely curious, especially since it's up to the people making claims to provide the evidence for them.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +2 / -4

Right, so this takes a lot of background, so I don't know if it'll all connect as it stands.

Money trumpeted the results in his 1972 book Man & Woman, Boy & Girl, written with the psychiatrist Anke A. Ehrhardt; a more popularized account appeared in Sexual Signatures (1976), written with the reporter Patricia Tucker.

Anke Ehrhardt had a lot of influence on government, LGBT and left-wing institutions compared to Money himself. She even managed to get a job working for Fauci during the AIDS epidemic. Her influence extended to the Ford Foundation, who made her a board member.

https://archive.ph/Ap9Zr

Speaking of the Ford Foundation...

American author, conservative philosopher, and critic of feminism Christina Hoff Sommers, criticized The Ford Foundation in her book The War Against Boys (2000) as well as other institutions in education and government.[69] Sommers alleged that the Ford Foundation funded feminist ideologies that marginalize boys and men.

Moving back to my original premise, and what connects it all together. Sally Miller Gearhart, who created the essay I quote ad infinitum, was the first ever creator of a gender studies curriculum.

There, she was able to develop one of the first women and gender studies programs in the United States.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart

I'm sure I don't need to explain that gender studies is based on Ehrhardt's work, and that the study was published in 1972, with less than 12 months between it and Gearhart's "revolutionary" gender studies curriculum.

Unless someone has a copy of the curriculum themselves that disproves it, my theory that Gearhart was actively involved in normalizing transgenderism holds up.

3
FutaCumDiet 3 points ago +3 / -0

All downvoters are pedophiles and feminist sympathizing cuckolds

When you're playing golf and they ask you your handicap, do you reply "inability to shut my mouth"?

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +1 / -5

I'm not a boomer, I don't play golf.