That's why all these fetishes like femdom, cuckolding etc are pushed by women. They marry people they hate and don't want to be near, just for their money, and need an out.
So, I saw this link when I searched for feminists advocating castration, when I was researching for a quick rebuttal to that woman-written propaganda piece that smacks of throwing the gun under the bed and claiming the victim shot themselves.
I thought it was a fetish site, so I didn't click it. I threw it into archive.today and it was a legitimate article.
My conscience is clear. Not to say that I don't feel guilt for having to support the wrong side, but what it will prevent is worth the short-term misery.
The only way to crush both is to link them, and nobody's even taken a single step.
You could kill trannyism and feminism in one day if you could prove that transitioning kids is a feminist thing, that it builds on the dreams of mass castration they had in the 60s.
Instead, because "anti-trans" advocates are really pro-woman and do nothing but deflect, we have to let the trannies win to destroy feminism, then destroy their movement next.
WTF are you talking about? Feminists link their fucking selves to tranny shit all the time. That's why TERFs became a thing.
we have to let the trannies win to destroy feminism, then destroy their movement next.
This makes no sense. Trannies are a part of feminism, even according to you in this very comment so we have to let feminism win to destroy feminism?
Please. Don't be coy with me. You're far too committed in your anti-natalism for this bullshit to fly anymore. Like I said earlier, you hate the idea of a family because it place commitments on you. You side with trannies because they are destroying family, not because they are destroying feminism.
No, they became a thing to ensure that their shitty movement doesn't get the blame for brainwashing kids.
Trannies are a part of feminism, even according to you in this very comment so we have to let feminism win to destroy feminism?
Trannies will destroy the meaning of woman, which will destroy their legal status, which will allow us to finally act against them without being sued.
You always go on about parallel economies on the right, that's your chance. All the leftist corporations are burdened with thousands of feminist women, while you will be allowed to recruit exclusively men.
Like I said earlier, you hate the idea of a family because it place commitments on you.
And you hate the idea of winning because you're a simp. See, we can both make ridiculous comments.
Maybe you don't have the background knowledge required to understand it.
Yes it is. But we need women's legal position to be completely destroyed. Every tranny claiming a woman-only benefit is a step towards such things not existing.
I'm not against the idea, just how it works in practice.
We've already seen a proliferation of trannies in women's sports, and that didn't do shit to stop the US women's soccer team on their mooching crusade. What you will probably get is a lot of women's only things like federal contracting being modified to also include LGBT people. That's doesn't do shit to help the ~95% of men are normal.
If saying there is nothing wrong with wanting a boy is advocating for infanticide, what are women doing when they talk about how it's good that mothers want girls?
while shilling for pro-castration, pro-BLM Dr. Oz?
If saying there is nothing wrong with wanting a boy
Eh, that is not what you said. This is the infanticide you were justifying (while constantly crying about non-existent abortions of boys):
According to the last census in 2011, there were 940 women for every 1,000 men and the child sex ratio [which counts children from birth to six years] was at 918 girls for 1,000 boys.
Against a feminist
The response to anything you say now should be "says the guy who called Kathy Barnette a feminist".
Imagine being such a maniac that you think castration and mastectomies on young children is good because the opponent is a woman.
Yeah, about that. Covid showed how easy it is to falsify data, so I wouldn't trust a word said on that topic. I've seen enough feminists talking about aborting a baby for being male to know there's something there.
says the guy who called Kathy Barnette a feminist
Does she support drafting women? Ending female privilege? Holding women accountable for the promotion of divisive ideology? Investigating how boys are treated in the schools? Outing feminist sympathizers in government?
She's a grifter who knows what to say to appeal to the Trump supporters who thought Oz was too leftist.
But you do trust the numbers you make up on the spot, while supporting infanticide of girls.
Does she support drafting women? Ending female privilege? Holding women accountable for the promotion of divisive ideology? Investigating how boys are treated in the schools? Outing feminist sympathizers in government?
Funny, never heard you pull that one out for your Dr. Oz. Miraculously, you also are not bothered by Dr. Oz supporting castration for kids, which you claim to oppose, and BLM, which you also claim to oppose. But no, you see a woman so you rage about that one.
Hit the nail on the head entirely.
That's why all these fetishes like femdom, cuckolding etc are pushed by women. They marry people they hate and don't want to be near, just for their money, and need an out.
Even their sadism is lazy.
No, they're pushed by Jews. The Jew is sexually a female.
Their about page says they didn't exist anymore. LOL
Testosterone is not just about muscle development. For men it affects bone density as well. Castration or low T will lead to brittle bones.
So, I saw this link when I searched for feminists advocating castration, when I was researching for a quick rebuttal to that woman-written propaganda piece that smacks of throwing the gun under the bed and claiming the victim shot themselves.
I thought it was a fetish site, so I didn't click it. I threw it into archive.today and it was a legitimate article.
Disturbing.
You really are desperate to deflect from the trannies, aren't you?
My conscience is clear. Not to say that I don't feel guilt for having to support the wrong side, but what it will prevent is worth the short-term misery.
The only way to crush both is to link them, and nobody's even taken a single step.
You could kill trannyism and feminism in one day if you could prove that transitioning kids is a feminist thing, that it builds on the dreams of mass castration they had in the 60s.
Instead, because "anti-trans" advocates are really pro-woman and do nothing but deflect, we have to let the trannies win to destroy feminism, then destroy their movement next.
WTF are you talking about? Feminists link their fucking selves to tranny shit all the time. That's why TERFs became a thing.
This makes no sense. Trannies are a part of feminism, even according to you in this very comment so we have to let feminism win to destroy feminism?
Please. Don't be coy with me. You're far too committed in your anti-natalism for this bullshit to fly anymore. Like I said earlier, you hate the idea of a family because it place commitments on you. You side with trannies because they are destroying family, not because they are destroying feminism.
No, they became a thing to ensure that their shitty movement doesn't get the blame for brainwashing kids.
Trannies will destroy the meaning of woman, which will destroy their legal status, which will allow us to finally act against them without being sued.
You always go on about parallel economies on the right, that's your chance. All the leftist corporations are burdened with thousands of feminist women, while you will be allowed to recruit exclusively men.
And you hate the idea of winning because you're a simp. See, we can both make ridiculous comments.
Like I just said, the rest of the feminists openly support trannies so this makes no sense.
WTF are you talking about? Women are just increasingly shoved aside in favor of trannies, but that's not doing shit to help men.
You are anti-natalist and anti-family. You're not exactly restrained in expressing that sentiment.
Maybe you don't have the background knowledge required to understand it.
Yes it is. But we need women's legal position to be completely destroyed. Every tranny claiming a woman-only benefit is a step towards such things not existing.
I'm not against the idea, just how it works in practice.
We've already seen a proliferation of trannies in women's sports, and that didn't do shit to stop the US women's soccer team on their mooching crusade. What you will probably get is a lot of women's only things like federal contracting being modified to also include LGBT people. That's doesn't do shit to help the ~95% of men are normal.
Didn't you just advocate for infanticide of girls, while shilling for pro-castration, pro-BLM Dr. Oz?
If saying there is nothing wrong with wanting a boy is advocating for infanticide, what are women doing when they talk about how it's good that mothers want girls?
Against a feminist and one of Ida Auken's shills.
Eh, that is not what you said. This is the infanticide you were justifying (while constantly crying about non-existent abortions of boys):
According to the last census in 2011, there were 940 women for every 1,000 men and the child sex ratio [which counts children from birth to six years] was at 918 girls for 1,000 boys.
The response to anything you say now should be "says the guy who called Kathy Barnette a feminist".
Imagine being such a maniac that you think castration and mastectomies on young children is good because the opponent is a woman.
Yeah, about that. Covid showed how easy it is to falsify data, so I wouldn't trust a word said on that topic. I've seen enough feminists talking about aborting a baby for being male to know there's something there.
Does she support drafting women? Ending female privilege? Holding women accountable for the promotion of divisive ideology? Investigating how boys are treated in the schools? Outing feminist sympathizers in government?
She's a grifter who knows what to say to appeal to the Trump supporters who thought Oz was too leftist.
Was that your inspiration?
But you do trust the numbers you make up on the spot, while supporting infanticide of girls.
Funny, never heard you pull that one out for your Dr. Oz. Miraculously, you also are not bothered by Dr. Oz supporting castration for kids, which you claim to oppose, and BLM, which you also claim to oppose. But no, you see a woman so you rage about that one.
This really was one of your 'mask off' moments.