94
Comments (31)
sorted by:
34
TentElephant 34 points ago +34 / -0

This shouldn't be surprising to anyone paying attention.

The Father of the Sexual Revolution, Alfred Kinsey, and creator of the Kinsey Scale of sexuality, conducted infant rape and documented it in his 1946 work Sexual Behavior In The Human Male. Bill de Blasio put pedos next to elementary schools. The Tavistock Clinic was doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children, but was fortunately slapped down recently by reactionary judges. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare. A high school in Ohio included child porn as part of it's curriculum, and a high school in Texas was caught giving kids pedo fan fic.

Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:

These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal, but somehow in bad taste. On the evening news, one sees handcuffed teachers, priests and Boy Scout leaders hustled into police vans. Therapists call them maladjusted, emotionally immature. But beauty has its own laws, inconsistent with Christian morality. As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of its civilization.

-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae

any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate sit in somebody's lap or engage in sexual activity... Instead of condemning pedophiles for their involvement with lesbian and gay youth, we should be supporting them. They need us badly.

-Pat Califia, The Aftermath of the Great Kiddy-Porn Panic of '77

Naked kids have been a staple of delight for centuries, for both parents and onlookers. So to label pedophilia as criminal is ridiculous.

-Allen Ginsberg, The Liberation is the Word, literary author, gay activist and founding member of NAMBLA

This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love... When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations.

-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws

Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.

-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory

But pederasty is probably historically the most common form of homosexuality in Western culture, as well as many other cultures. It exists in all cultures, and in some is considered the norm, even today (e.g., Iran, among the Pashtuns). To label it 'child abuse' or 'child molestation' is preposterous and stupid.

-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"

It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not ­it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.

-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.

If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.

-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.

But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.

-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws

Suppression of the natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, good and adjusted in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. Initially, the child has to submit to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family, which process makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and anxiety.

-Wilhem Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism

Other notable globohomo clergy:

Judge Brett Blomme, organizer of Drag Queen Story hour, made child porn in his home.

Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.

Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.

Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".

Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.

Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:

Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.

Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:

Rodney Reed raped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.

Plebbit is run by tranny pedos.

tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.

Last updated 18 September 2021

21
AntonioOfVenice 21 points ago +23 / -2

Rotherham showed, unfortunately, that the average Westerner would allow his own underage daughter to be raped by pedophiles for a cheap virtue-signal.

9
TentElephant 9 points ago +9 / -0

Is that really the average person or are those voices amplified by the powers that shouldn't be because they virtue signal? I'm constantly going back and forth between "everyone is an NPC" and "the silent majority want the world to be normal again." Those obviously aren't mutually exclusive outside of the most extreme interpretations.

8
AntonioOfVenice 8 points ago +10 / -2

I think the silent majority does not like it, but not enough to do anything about it or to even try to think or figure things out for themselves (to be fair, people have busy lives).

4
TakenusernameA 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are bullied into silence via false peer-pressure created by social media. Humans are herd animals and find it difficult to go against what they perceive as the popular opinion. Twitter and the like have created the illusion that all this degeneracy is widely accepted and thus normies will not speak out against even if they know it to be wrong.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
7
Fartinggoose 7 points ago +10 / -3

They did care and they were repeatedly trying to get a task force made to prevent it. Any time they put a report on the management's desk it disappeared and was never heard of again. This lead to many cops resigning over it and talking about the problem openly on police forums. The boots on the ground tried to act against it but couldn't do anything when the legal system let them off on a single basis and any attempt to bring a real attempt to prevent it was memory holed.

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

This shouldn't be surprising to anyone paying attention.

More to the point, it was John Hopkins University that castrated and sexually abused David Reimer.

3
TheImpossible1 3 points ago +5 / -2

And created the Covid panic.

And "toxic masculinity", I think.

3
truenationalist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for posting this.

These people are disgusting and society does not need them.

2
Fartinggoose 2 points ago +5 / -3

Find a better image host. The one you're on will delete those images without a second thought.

5
TentElephant 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're right, and I've been lazy about it. Got any suggestions for good hosts that don't require an account?

20
cccpneveragain 20 points ago +20 / -0

So the wolves don't even have to put on sheep's clothing anymore....they just open the gate and let the damn wolf in with them.

7
FrozeInFear 7 points ago +7 / -0

In this case, the wolf is now a gatekeeper. A pedo leading a charge to disguise pedophiles works in a place where he'll have easy access to potential victims.

4
censorthisss 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's unreal. I don't even know what else to say at this point.

2
realerfunction 2 points ago +2 / -0

not letting the fox guard the henhouse is bigotry

13
AntonioOfVenice 13 points ago +15 / -2

"We are excited to share that Allyn Walker, PhD, will be joining the Moore Center as a postdoctoral fellow on May 25," the Moore Center for Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse

The Ministry of Truth judges the name of this organization to be accurate.

8
Erithal 8 points ago +8 / -0

They should strike the bits between Moore and Child, moving Center to the end:

Moore Child Sexual Abuse Center.

That sounds about right.

9
FromTheShadows 9 points ago +9 / -0

The well has been poisoned. Any place where children are separated from their parents is nothing more than a magnet for sexual predators. Schools, daycare, summer camps, and yes, abuse prevention centers.

2
TakenusernameA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Always has been.

Getting the parents to work at office and factory jobs away from home and each other was the start of this madness.

7
WhitePhoenix 7 points ago +7 / -0

Say it with me everyone.

Where do MAPS belong?

They should be hung on a wall.

6
LawNmowermaN 6 points ago +6 / -0

Dig through and it's perverts all the way down. Pedos, incest, none of it is too much for them in the name of "deconstructing" everything to animalistic rutting and, eventually, direct brain stimulus of the pleasure center. It sounds crazy to normal people, but ask yourself, where is the limit for people like this? Where is the point where the broader Left will reject further leftward pull?

5
Baron_Bubbles [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

I remember reading about a study where they hooked mice up with a gadget that let them trigger the pleasure center of their brains. The result was they pleasured them selves to death.

3
Knife-TotingRat 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's basically what happens with cocaine overdose. It's not a "mice are stupid" thing by any means. Hook a humie up to that thing, the same would happen.

2
LawNmowermaN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. That's where this leads if all forms of constraint on pleasure-seeking are deconstructed, and their ideology does not put up any serious limits on such. "Consent" is a wafer-thin barrier, because they think that only patriarchal western hegemonic values actually create the social conditions that cause people to refuse sexual conduct. They may honor a refusal (for now), but they think that most refusals are a learned behavior that needs to be un-learned.

Back in the real world, people need certain relationships in their life to be non-sexual. Sex is tied up in all kinds of feelings and pressures which cannot be deconstructed; they are part of our million-year evolution by mate selection, and those feelings will always be there. We need friends, yes, but opposite-sex friends could still develop attraction. People need parents, siblings, cousins - that is, they need other people in their lives for whom it is never acceptable to change the nature of a relationship to sex. And that's not just to avoid the genetic issues of incest (otherwise birth control would be enough, and there would be no problem with step-family or other nonblood incest). It's because the nature of the parent or sibling relationship, and its effect on health and moral development, requires that it be nonsexual. Turning it into just another potentially sexual relationship destroys the security that a family relationship provides.

But again, lefty ideology believes this is all a social convention, and an oppressive one at that. And there is no hard barrier in their worldview that puts a limit on sexualization.

5
EsotericRefuse 5 points ago +5 / -0

Branded... now there's an idea...

4
0000Titan 4 points ago +4 / -0

They love pedophilia because it's the last bulwark that, while opposition remains, proves their entire program of unconditional devotion to moral relativism and liberation is pure garbage. The wafer thin protection of "consent" (particularly legally constructed) is never going to hold out against these degenerates in this downward spiral we are in.

4
TakenusernameA 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are Marxists and view children as property of the state. Not only are they sexually grooming these children, they are also politically grooming them to view the state as their parent.

2
CarmenOfSandiego 2 points ago +2 / -0

minor-attracted persons"

Maps go on the wall.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TomSeeSaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

That particular child sex abuse prevention center has a twitter account, the history of which, explains why.

In short: Groomer Center

1
TakenusernameA 1 point ago +1 / -0

To no ones surprise, groomers are drawn to jobs where they have easy access to children.