Ah ok, I'd probably call them the "friendly commies" or something like that. Admittedly I tend to lump most socialist stuff together in my own mind though.
I find it funny though, because unless there's some major revelation in the last 45 pages of my book to this point it's seemed like a warning against a weird collectivist society that I can't put a finger on how to categorize. Maybe it's just the difference in the world then versus today, because I can't get past the feeling that this book is the world that today's so-called socialists think they want and is definitely the world the WEF-type elites want. So being that Huxley was a socialist and it doesn't seem like he's glorifying the fictional world, I can't see what he's trying to warn against. Freedom and socialism are total opposites in my head. I guess I need to try to get in the head of the world 90 years ago.
Ah ok, I'd probably call them the "friendly commies" or something like that. Admittedly I tend to lump most socialist stuff together in my own mind though.
I find it funny though, because unless there's some major revelation in the last 45 pages of my book to this point it's seemed like a warning against a weird collectivist society that I can't put a finger on how to categorize. Maybe it's just the difference in the world then versus today, because I can't get past the feeling that this book is the world that today's so-called socialists think they want and is definitely the world the WEF-type elites want. So being that Huxley was a socialist and it doesn't seem like he's glorifying the fictional world, I can't see what he's trying to warn against. Freedom and socialism are total opposites in my head. I guess I need to try to get in the head of the world 90 years ago.