The few suggest "war" to deceive the many to consent to "want or not want" the suggested war; which a) causes want vs not want division among those consenting to the suggestion and b) is what allows wars to be utilized to racketeer all the want vs not want conflicts caused by simple suggestions.
Over half a century and counting of suggested "abortion" is running smoothly only because the majority consents to want (pro-choice) versus not want (pro-life) the suggested abortions.
Instead of consenting to anything "anti" vs "pro"; why not use choice to sustain self; while resisting the temptations suggested by others. In other words...instead of choosing want vs not want (imbalance); why not choosing need over want (balance)?
The few suggest "war" to deceive the many to consent to "want or not want" the suggested war; which a) causes want vs not want division among those consenting to the suggestion and b) is what allows wars to be utilized to racketeer all the want vs not want conflicts caused by simple suggestions.
Over half a century and counting of suggested "abortion" is running smoothly only because the majority consents to want (pro-choice) versus not want (pro-life) the suggested abortions.
Instead of consenting to anything "anti" vs "pro"; why not use choice to sustain self; while resisting the temptations suggested by others. In other words...instead of choosing want vs not want (imbalance); why not choosing need over want (balance)?