I already made this post. I predicted this. Next one is Mastercard/Proctor and Gamble.
Also, quiet part out loud, again. I notice the pride flag, so no prizes for guessing this creature is a male hate fetishist who probably thinks "men in women's spaces" is a real issue.
80% myocarditis fatality rate in 5 years was known before the More Feminine Flu based off existing cases of viral myocarditis.
Short-term results are actually worse than viral myocarditis, so we could see it go even higher than that. Maybe the fabled 90% that is mentioned in The Future - if there is one - is Female.
The myocarditis rate is now known to double after every shot. The paper IIRC has a female author, so that's probably still an understatement.
We know the "experts" are pushing that men's protection disappears faster so they need boosters more frequently.
We know that myocarditis doesn't seem to at all affect the ruling class. We know that the people pushing mandatory vaccination all seem to be puppets of feminism or feminists themselves.
I've said a few times that the actions of women in politics hold men back, but we can rise above it and achieve great things. I don't know if I still believe that. I think that if they keep tightening the screws, there won't be a way to build a career anymore. There might not even be a way to survive that isn't based off pure luck.
For the first time ever, I'm starting to feel like we can't beat them.
Please let 2022 give us something to rally behind.
Edit : How did I mix up slower and faster? I blame being consumed with anger.
Then you didn't click on the link, because it's quite funny.
I predicted this. Next one is Mastercard/Proctor and Gamble.
What did you predict?
Regarding these other two, if 900 other companies institute a vaccine mandate, and then Mastercard, you'll still claim victory.
Also, quiet part out loud, again. I notice the pride flag, so no prizes for guessing this creature is a male hate fetishist who probably thinks "men in women's spaces" is a real issue.
Quite the contrary, she thinks men in women's spaces is absolutely great.
We know...We know ...We know ...We know ...We know ...
Eh... you're going to 'know' what you want to think.
I've said a few times that the actions of women in politics hold men back, but we can rise above it and achieve great things. I don't know if I still believe that. I think that if they keep tightening the screws, there won't be a way to build a career anymore. There might not even be a way to survive that isn't based off pure luck.
Corona will disappear in a few months, if omicron is as contagious as it now appears to be. The dead-enders will look like the crazies that they are. The end.
It's a feminist woman bragging about forcing unwanted substances into men's bodies. It's very...unsurprising to me. I still think everything they accuse us of is their plan for us.
I said the first companies to fire the unjabbed would be feminist true believers from my list. With Citigroup being the first to do it and Intel being the first to announce it, I'm 2/2 so far. (Well, I would be if the online version of the list was the same as the one I'm replacing it with. I added the obvious suspects because they are apparently only obvious to me.)
At least we'll get to take their spaces before we die of myocarditis. Maybe.
It's all from things I've posted with reputable sourcing, no conjecture or theories.
I don't believe they'll let it go. If they do, we got a miracle and need to act before they try again.
It's a woman bragging about forcing unwanted substances into men's bodies.
Everyone's. Even though you had bet $10 that women would be exempted, turns out it wudn't.
They want to control... everyone.
I said the first companies to fire the unjabbed would be feminist true believers from my list.
I see no mention of Citigroup in your list.
With Citigroup being the first to do it
The first? Really?
At least we'll get to take their spaces before we die of myocarditis. Maybe.
So your prediction is that 80% of 1/3000 of young men who took the vaccine will die of myocaridties within 5 years?
I find it interesting that you have switched twice now on whether the vaccines are "INTENDED TO MURDER US!!!!!!!!!!" A while back, you said that it wouldn't because it would only kill those who "trust them" (as if anyone but you makes a connection between the vaccine and females of the opposite sex).
It's all from things I've posted with reputable sourcing
Eh... one thing I have learned is that there is no such thing.
I don't believe they'll let it go.
Certainly not voluntarily. As a way to control people, this beats anything you can come up with.
They didn't need to be exempted. It doesn't affect them, that was why it was approved by the feminist led FDA and promoted by the feminist led CDC.
Yes, I can't find the comment, I included them in the comment alongside P&G and the rest of that list. I need to update that list with the enemies I find blindingly obvious because I think others don't follow so closely.
Except every booster doubles the myocarditis rate. I have the PDF file showing this. So, assuming three jabs a year and the initial rate of 1 per 10,000 (it's around 1.78) for ease of calculation, that's :
80% of 1 in 2,500 after the current full booster cycle.
80% of 1 in 312.5 after two years, which I will round to 1 in 300 for ease of the next calculation.
They didn't need to be exempted. It doesn't affect them,
Are you even serious? Your own graphs that you kept obsessively posting to prove that the vaccine is a MURDER WEAPON also showed very high rates of myocarditis for women.
that was why it was approved by the feminist led FDA and promoted by the feminist led CDC.
lol
I need to update that list with the enemies I find blindingly obvious because I think others don't follow so closely.
If you leave out some of the weaker ones, that will make your list better.
Except every booster doubles the myocarditis rate. I have the PDF file showing this. So, assuming three jabs a year and the initial rate of 1 per 10,000 (it's around 1.78) for ease of calculation, that's :
That 1 in 37.5 is extremely unlikely. But assuming that it is correct, what do you think will happen if 3% of young men die, due to recommendations by governments and 'health' authorities? There will be a revolution. Guillotines, firing squads, lynchings of the ruling class.
And that won't be you doing it - it will be the 'feminist' you hate because they killed her precious Johnny.
Well, we'll see in five years who is right. Will they be dropping like flies with us or will they be still posting #KillAllMen like normal?
Both of those things are true. The CDC's Director spent the last 4 years whining about glass ceilings in medical science before magically getting the job from the senile one's puppet admin.
Maybe. I'm trying to find a balance between my obscenely long personal list and something that could actually be used by others.
It's based off the data we have on the jabs. The rate of doubling could lower after a certain number, but as it stands, the risk doubles after every jab.
What do I think will happen? I think they'll double down, start blaming the Chinese and push for WW3. If you think they'll actually allow the truth to get out and not just claim "new variant", especially as it's 3% after 5 years, which gives them a lot of time to plan a cover up. It's clever, each year sets a new timer for a slightly larger group of their enemy to die. Then they have around five years to set the narrative.
Why in 5 years? I'm pretty sure you will have left by then, and if not, this will have been forgotten. I don't see you keeping up this intensity for five whole years. Surely, you can make a prediction that is not that far off.
Will they be dropping like flies with us
No one's going to be dropping like flies. You're also ignoring the Canadian link that you yourself sent me, which also showed very high myocarditis rates for women, though somewhat lower. If you actually believe that 3% of men are going to die in 7 years, then 2% of women are going to die.
The CDC's Director spent the last 4 years whining about glass ceilings in medical science
It's also irrelevant, as anyone else would have approved this vaccine as well.
It's based off the data we have on the jabs. The rate of doubling could lower after a certain number, but as it stands, the risk doubles after every jab.
I mean if this is true. You're here assuming that governments are going to push three vaccines a year after the first two, even for groups that are not at risk, and that these people who are not at risk are going to say "thank you, Sir, may I have another one?"
That simply isn't going to happen. But if it did, it would result in the overthrow of the current order.
What do I think will happen? I think they'll double down, start blaming the Chinese and push for WW3.
Blame the Chinese for what? If millions start dying of heart problems, how exactly are they going to blame that on the Chinese? They could conceivably blame it on health damage during lockdowns, but even that would be far-fetched.
If you think they'll actually allow the truth to get out
Like the truth got out about their "murder weapon", the AstraZeneca vaccine? Or the Moderna vaccine for under 30? These had infinitesimal risks, at least the ones that are known, and yet they were withdrawn.
But you think they're going to cover up millions of young, healthy men dropping dead? Not even in North Korea could you do that. In Nazi Germany, families of mentally handicapped people who had been murdered discovered their murders because the 'cause of death' was suspiciously alike in every case.
It's clever, each year sets a new timer for a slightly larger group of their enemy to die.
And I presume that the many men in the medical establishment are either in on it, or they're being deceived?
I feel like there's a substantial proportion of people who aren't getting vaccinated because they like feigning persecution
Some people are always a victim. Blaming other people for everything bad in their lives is just avoiding their errors in judgement and failing to learn by their mistakes.
I already made this post. I predicted this. Next one is Mastercard/Proctor and Gamble.
Also, quiet part out loud, again. I notice the pride flag, so no prizes for guessing this creature is a male hate fetishist who probably thinks "men in women's spaces" is a real issue.
80% myocarditis fatality rate in 5 years was known before the More Feminine Flu based off existing cases of viral myocarditis.
Short-term results are actually worse than viral myocarditis, so we could see it go even higher than that. Maybe the fabled 90% that is mentioned in The Future - if there is one - is Female.
The myocarditis rate is now known to double after every shot. The paper IIRC has a female author, so that's probably still an understatement.
We know the "experts" are pushing that men's protection disappears faster so they need boosters more frequently.
We know that myocarditis doesn't seem to at all affect the ruling class. We know that the people pushing mandatory vaccination all seem to be puppets of feminism or feminists themselves.
I've said a few times that the actions of women in politics hold men back, but we can rise above it and achieve great things. I don't know if I still believe that. I think that if they keep tightening the screws, there won't be a way to build a career anymore. There might not even be a way to survive that isn't based off pure luck.
For the first time ever, I'm starting to feel like we can't beat them.
Please let 2022 give us something to rally behind.
Edit : How did I mix up slower and faster? I blame being consumed with anger.
Then you didn't click on the link, because it's quite funny.
What did you predict?
Regarding these other two, if 900 other companies institute a vaccine mandate, and then Mastercard, you'll still claim victory.
Quite the contrary, she thinks men in women's spaces is absolutely great.
Eh... you're going to 'know' what you want to think.
Corona will disappear in a few months, if omicron is as contagious as it now appears to be. The dead-enders will look like the crazies that they are. The end.
It's a feminist woman bragging about forcing unwanted substances into men's bodies. It's very...unsurprising to me. I still think everything they accuse us of is their plan for us.
I said the first companies to fire the unjabbed would be feminist true believers from my list. With Citigroup being the first to do it and Intel being the first to announce it, I'm 2/2 so far. (Well, I would be if the online version of the list was the same as the one I'm replacing it with. I added the obvious suspects because they are apparently only obvious to me.)
At least we'll get to take their spaces before we die of myocarditis. Maybe.
It's all from things I've posted with reputable sourcing, no conjecture or theories.
I don't believe they'll let it go. If they do, we got a miracle and need to act before they try again.
Everyone's. Even though you had bet $10 that women would be exempted, turns out it wudn't.
They want to control... everyone.
I see no mention of Citigroup in your list.
The first? Really?
So your prediction is that 80% of 1/3000 of young men who took the vaccine will die of myocaridties within 5 years?
I find it interesting that you have switched twice now on whether the vaccines are "INTENDED TO MURDER US!!!!!!!!!!" A while back, you said that it wouldn't because it would only kill those who "trust them" (as if anyone but you makes a connection between the vaccine and females of the opposite sex).
Eh... one thing I have learned is that there is no such thing.
Certainly not voluntarily. As a way to control people, this beats anything you can come up with.
They didn't need to be exempted. It doesn't affect them, that was why it was approved by the feminist led FDA and promoted by the feminist led CDC.
Yes, I can't find the comment, I included them in the comment alongside P&G and the rest of that list. I need to update that list with the enemies I find blindingly obvious because I think others don't follow so closely.
Except every booster doubles the myocarditis rate. I have the PDF file showing this. So, assuming three jabs a year and the initial rate of 1 per 10,000 (it's around 1.78) for ease of calculation, that's :
80% of 1 in 2,500 after the current full booster cycle.
80% of 1 in 312.5 after two years, which I will round to 1 in 300 for ease of the next calculation.
80% of 1 in 37.5 after three years.
Are you even serious? Your own graphs that you kept obsessively posting to prove that the vaccine is a MURDER WEAPON also showed very high rates of myocarditis for women.
lol
If you leave out some of the weaker ones, that will make your list better.
That 1 in 37.5 is extremely unlikely. But assuming that it is correct, what do you think will happen if 3% of young men die, due to recommendations by governments and 'health' authorities? There will be a revolution. Guillotines, firing squads, lynchings of the ruling class.
And that won't be you doing it - it will be the 'feminist' you hate because they killed her precious Johnny.
Well, we'll see in five years who is right. Will they be dropping like flies with us or will they be still posting #KillAllMen like normal?
Both of those things are true. The CDC's Director spent the last 4 years whining about glass ceilings in medical science before magically getting the job from the senile one's puppet admin.
Maybe. I'm trying to find a balance between my obscenely long personal list and something that could actually be used by others.
It's based off the data we have on the jabs. The rate of doubling could lower after a certain number, but as it stands, the risk doubles after every jab.
What do I think will happen? I think they'll double down, start blaming the Chinese and push for WW3. If you think they'll actually allow the truth to get out and not just claim "new variant", especially as it's 3% after 5 years, which gives them a lot of time to plan a cover up. It's clever, each year sets a new timer for a slightly larger group of their enemy to die. Then they have around five years to set the narrative.
Why in 5 years? I'm pretty sure you will have left by then, and if not, this will have been forgotten. I don't see you keeping up this intensity for five whole years. Surely, you can make a prediction that is not that far off.
No one's going to be dropping like flies. You're also ignoring the Canadian link that you yourself sent me, which also showed very high myocarditis rates for women, though somewhat lower. If you actually believe that 3% of men are going to die in 7 years, then 2% of women are going to die.
It's also irrelevant, as anyone else would have approved this vaccine as well.
I mean if this is true. You're here assuming that governments are going to push three vaccines a year after the first two, even for groups that are not at risk, and that these people who are not at risk are going to say "thank you, Sir, may I have another one?"
That simply isn't going to happen. But if it did, it would result in the overthrow of the current order.
Blame the Chinese for what? If millions start dying of heart problems, how exactly are they going to blame that on the Chinese? They could conceivably blame it on health damage during lockdowns, but even that would be far-fetched.
Like the truth got out about their "murder weapon", the AstraZeneca vaccine? Or the Moderna vaccine for under 30? These had infinitesimal risks, at least the ones that are known, and yet they were withdrawn.
But you think they're going to cover up millions of young, healthy men dropping dead? Not even in North Korea could you do that. In Nazi Germany, families of mentally handicapped people who had been murdered discovered their murders because the 'cause of death' was suspiciously alike in every case.
And I presume that the many men in the medical establishment are either in on it, or they're being deceived?
Oh the ironing....
Guarantee none of them are real people