It's anti-Science™ but not necessarily anti-science, although in this case it probably is. Peer review is dumb and functions primarily as a screen for political orthodoxy. The overwhelming majority of peer reviewed published studies are wrong, as explained here by the bugman Veritasium.
That's literally anti-science btw
It's anti-Science™ but not necessarily anti-science, although in this case it probably is. Peer review is dumb and functions primarily as a screen for political orthodoxy. The overwhelming majority of peer reviewed published studies are wrong, as explained here by the bugman Veritasium.
"Peer review" in 2021 is often BS, but the actual concept of peer review is that other people check and confirm your work.
Thus a peer-reviewed scientific study is more FACT than one that isn't.
Absolutely agreed.
I wonder what else happened in mid-1960s. Hmmmm.