Comments (26)
sorted by:
MargarineMongoose 44 points ago +44 / -0

The goal is to suppress men's natural tendency to solve problems in sensible ways. The end result is paralysis and an inability to oppose evil.

FBoysInc [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

Eventually with the aide of technology and the brainwashing that is public education, we will be enslaved to the State, permanently.

Assassin47 33 points ago +33 / -0

I'd suggest sending this to Stephen Colbert but he wouldn't see the problem. Total spinelessness? That's a feature!

Erithal 20 points ago +20 / -0

Indeed! A person who is afraid to stand up for themselves will never stand up to the state!

Steampunk_Moustache 22 points ago +22 / -0

Total spinelessness is exacty what they want of you. Complete dependence upon the state for all things.

"Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State."

Viewer01 22 points ago +22 / -0

It is rather simple, it is the perspective of a woman. Evolutionarily, complying with the aggressor has yielded the most viable strategy. The aggressor takes what it wants, sex, and then moves on. Why? Because the woman is no physical threat and might provide further value. Compared with males, who if left alive are a constant threat. Thus they are usually killed.

Heres where it gets interesting. Women will create insane self defense law, because it benefits the most aggressive party. Why would they insist on a system wherein aggressive males were pruned from society?

Takkune 5 points ago +5 / -0

So, is my brain wired weirdly or something? I'm a woman but I'd rather die than comply and let someone just do what they want to me. I know I can't physically fight a male so I carry a weapon (and think every innocent person should have the right to do so) and, if I can't get to it in time, I'm prepared to fight dirty. Go fast and hard at the balls, eyes, slam at their nose with my wrist. Anything.

Kinda sick to think my sex is so weak to want the posted reality. I think weak males who want the first shot want this, too.

Viewer01 9 points ago +9 / -0

It’s a bell curve. There’s also the fact people talk tough but then get into the actual situation and their instincts start kicking in. Glad you’re different, but this is the exception.

MargarineMongoose 5 points ago +5 / -0

Possibly, there are always outliers. Or perhaps you're simply in denial because such a reality makes you look morally deficient and the ego could not survive such scrutiny.

Personal situation aside, yes your sex is exactly that weak. The disparity in physical aptitude between men and women is on the scale of the Grand Canyon. Most women have no idea the actual degree to which they will be outclassed in a physical confrontation with a man, and the stream of Hollywood fantasies has done nothing to remedy this.

Takkune 5 points ago +5 / -0

I could be in denial. I've never been in a situation where I really needed to defend myself. I think prevention is an often overlooked aspect to self defense. Don't go to a party alone (if you do, you must maintain your senses, I would say don't drink at all and definitely DO NOT accept drinks, keep your drink in your possession) or have at least one trusted friend to stay sober and keep an eye on you (established beforehand and repay them for babysitting afterward). I think giving off body language that screams "if you mess with me I'll make sure it hurts" too, because there were times I had to go to downtown Chicago at sketchy hours for work around the holidays (retail) and have only had one weirdo kinda try to get in my face but backed off quickly without a word from me.

I also don't dress like a slut or openly carry valuables (in fact when I lived in Chicago I didn't carry a purse and kept a thin wallet in my pocket like a man would) I've always believed in traveling light and inconspicuously.

Anyway, sorry for the brick of text, I'm sure it's not needed here, but I guess I have some hope that some defiant girl will come in here looking to start a fight in favor of OP and that this might actually help her stop seeing herself as a victim and start realizing there are things she can control to protect herself.

MargarineMongoose 3 points ago +3 / -0

Preventative maintenance is a top shelf approach to a great number of things in life, not just self defense.

Takkune 3 points ago +3 / -0

100% agree. It just seems to me, especially for self defence, preventative measures are more often on the back burner and actually considered an insult.

"Don't judge my clothes! Tell men not to rape!" "I shouldn't have to keep an eye on my drink! Tell people not to drug drinks!" No shit toots. The bad guys don't care. It's on you to protect yourself from bad guys who don't care about you.

I notice this mentality becoming increasingly popular with heath, too. The HAES movement and all. Sad really.

Assassin47 2 points ago +3 / -1

They're just making a generalization, which a lot of people do here. That's fine but some go too far and apply their generalizations to individuals. There are only two sexes but obviously people fall on a spectrum of personality traits with some more feminine and some more masculine regardless of sex. At the risk of sounding rude, you have those manly traits. It's not "weird" since there are plenty of women like that - just not the majority by nature.

Since individuals can vary so much I can respect gender roles but don't agree with limiting someone's position in life due to their sex, as long as we're not lowering standards to let women into men's roles. (we are and that's a problem)

krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

Since individuals can vary so much I can respect gender roles but don't agree with limiting someone's position in life due to their sex

Then you don’t really respect gender roles.

Takkune 1 point ago +1 / -0

No offense taken. There are a lot of great masculine/"manly" traits and I'm happy to have them.

And I agree 100% with your last point. I guess another "manly" trait I have is the want to be successful, or rightly fail, due to my own merits, not my sex. Any other treatment is condescending. Honestly the fact that's what modern feminists seem to want seems completely against the whole spirit of the original intent but I'm no expert on any of that.

alucard13mmfmj 9 points ago +9 / -0

They just want to rape, pillage and kill you without much resistance. Why we mad at them? Hehehehhehe.

superspathi 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah, they sing a different tune if it is one of the precious POCs defending themselves from a white attacker.

APDSmith 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, but they can just decline to prosecute if that happens. Remember Ayn Rand - these people certainly do:

The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

That's their theory of government - everybody is a criminal, and the government picks and chooses which criminals it punishes and which it decorates.

Medicnz2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Only America has your ground, everywhere else is duty to retreat.

Xzal 5 points ago +5 / -0

Only to an extent. It has to be proven that you took measures to separate yourself from the aggressor. If the aggressor continues to invade your "space" then self defense can be invoked.

The problem is... Evidencing this. Accessing the evidence that supports you. Not having a corrupt court system. Or a judge that wil move the goalpost if you do manage to prove effort was taken.

This is why Europe has a lot of those weird "bumping fights" where no punches are actually thrown, it's more a stupid chest bumping, shoulder barging "ooh ooh" Monke fight.

DickCactus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I really need to read this...

bobobob 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fitting since the politicians want to turn us into a new USSR.

dontdrinksoy -8 points ago +2 / -10

So, every street fight, you should be allowed to pull out a knife, and stab someone to death, and that is self-defense? C'mon. Use your brain. This commie piece of shit murdered someone, and fuck him. He's lucky he only got 10 years. He's a soldier, no? You're a soldier, and you can't stand, and throw punches? What a weakling.

And also this is not at all similar to the Kyle Rittenhouse case. The people chasing after Kyle had plans to murder him, and furthermore it was three against one, and they had weapons.

TheWestYearZero 9 points ago +9 / -0

Trayvon and Zimmerman. Zimmerman was being murdered. Pulled gun. Lived.

yvaN_ehT_nioJ 7 points ago +7 / -0

Even a punch can be fatal so if you don't think that guy was justified I don't know what to tell you. Go get in a fight and see for yourself I guess

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0