As we now have trans as a protected class it has shown the slippery slope in full free fall from the “gay rights” debate a decade ago. The problem is that laws based on fallacies will always be abused because their is no need to prove that any additions are legitimate. We have known for centuries men and women are not equal, we have known for centuries that racial aggregates depended on the culture dictating genetics. When we pretended that this didn’t matter we opened the door for non-biological protected classes. There has never been any evidence that being gay or trans is genetic, and there has been inconclusive evidence that gay and trans is biological at all aside from the biological impact occurring from grooming. In fact the best biological evidence we have is that external stimuli (aka other people) is what causes biological changes in the individual. Yet now we have more protected classes that are inherently non-biological than provably biological. These abuses are meant to subjugate not protect, they are meant to deny reality in place of accepting it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (138)
sorted by:
Gay marriage was always about a proud queer couple being able to recruit a government agent to go stick a gun in the face of a priest and force them to perform a gay wedding. It had a whole bunch of other stuff tacked on as window dressing that was already solvable through other means, but to the militant gay lobby it was always about forcing religion to bend the knee. Remember that it is religion that says homosexual lifestyle is a life of sin.
The Masterpiece Cake Shop serial litigation situation does not happen in a vacuum, that is what the Gay lobby wanted to do to devout religions people from the get go.
Physically impossible. The government has no method of regulating a church. They can just either recognize a marriage or not recognize it. The government can't stop your church from allowing you to marry a cow, it just won't let you claim the cow as a dependent.
Your confusing gays and Leftism. Leftism has always sought to destroy religion as a rival faith. That's what you're calling 'the militant gay lobby'. Homosexuals didn't need the approval of your religion to be homosexual, or even to believe that it wasn't a sin.