Oh god, did it really? I've been listening to Rakieta's 10 hour livestreams of the first 3 days and then some (I'm at https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fxzpp6D_VxQ rn) and it was bewildering how fucking incompetent the defense been with their such an absolutely clear case. The judge is pretty based though.
It's entertaining during parts of the trial that would otherwise be dull (there were multiple witnesses today that were dull or difficult to watch without commentary IMO.) I didn't watch any of his commentary on the Vic case (I wasn't interested enough to watch a three+ hour late-night stream live or otherwise), and aside from him disagreeing with what the judge ruled on that case (which is still waiting on appeal, IIRC) I don't recall any bad/biased takes being discussed in any of the KIA forums. What do you mean exactly by "how he handed" it?
Oh god, did it really? I've been listening to Rakieta's 10 hour livestreams of the first 3 days and then some (I'm at https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fxzpp6D_VxQ rn) and it was bewildering how fucking incompetent the defense been with their such an absolutely clear case. The judge is pretty based though.
question from a casual observer: why is anyone still trusting Rekieta after how he handled the Vic Mignogna case?
It's entertaining during parts of the trial that would otherwise be dull (there were multiple witnesses today that were dull or difficult to watch without commentary IMO.) I didn't watch any of his commentary on the Vic case (I wasn't interested enough to watch a three+ hour late-night stream live or otherwise), and aside from him disagreeing with what the judge ruled on that case (which is still waiting on appeal, IIRC) I don't recall any bad/biased takes being discussed in any of the KIA forums. What do you mean exactly by "how he handed" it?