Whose definition of 'false' will they be using? Because the UK government's official statistics and policy are 'false' by the definitions of silicon valley tech oligarchs, and posting official UK government statistics that are counter to the holy narrative is literally a bannable offence.
So will they be going to Twitter's London office to arrest everyone in it? Or will they be arresting themselves for breaking Twitter's rules?
The law would create a “knowingly false communication” offence
I'm no fan of liars either, but gee! What could POSSIBLY go wrong? Where are they gonna find these perfect infallible arbiters of truth?
rofl
Whose definition of 'false' will they be using? Because the UK government's official statistics and policy are 'false' by the definitions of silicon valley tech oligarchs, and posting official UK government statistics that are counter to the holy narrative is literally a bannable offence.
So will they be going to Twitter's London office to arrest everyone in it? Or will they be arresting themselves for breaking Twitter's rules?
I'm no fan of liars either, but gee! What could POSSIBLY go wrong? Where are they gonna find these perfect infallible arbiters of truth?
"It is unethical and counter-productice to vaccinate children against SARS-2."
The UK health institute concluded from all avaliable data AGAINST vaccinating children.
But in the USA and Canada, comming to the same conclusion is "dangerous misinformation".
It was never about health or truth, but about control.