Behold and beware as I say things that are politically inconvenient and uncivil until inevitably I am yet again sealed for another hundred years for daring to question the unquestionable and having the balls to defend my beliefs openly and honestly!
Rejoice, as the forum you came to enjoy degenerates into the same madness that befell /r/Kotakuinaction2!
Make comments about women's role in the downfall of civilization? Banned.
Make interesting but schizo-fueled OP posts that get mass engagement? Banned.
Make jokes about historical events that must not be joked about? Banned.
Rule 16 was and is an abomination and must be fixed. There is no sitewide rule requiring these stringent adherences to communistic speech conventions.
Half-assed optics will not save this place from a purge if the powers that be so desire for it.
All we accomplish by limiting our discussions into spartan molds of "acceptable speech" is creating avenues for degenerate drivel to take root in the gaps between linguistic interpretation.
Good, honest discussion by legitimate users is currently being stymied. Multiple high profile users have copped sudden bans for speech that was previously acceptable. This is an unarguable point.
EDIT: LMAO I got instantly banned. DoM lay the fuck off the ban button bro you're becoming just like pinkerbelle.
Imagine asking a man a question you know he can't respond to publicly because you literally just finished banning him? 🤣
This is what I was banned for two weeks ago.
AoV's comment is still up and he's yet to be banned for any of his ridiculous statements. Bans only go in one direction, even though the rationale used precludes that both parties be banned.
This is what I was banned for today.
I broke no rules either time.
I say again, beware. The janny is turning into another brimshae/pinkerbell/davidme.
See you all in a month when I'll point out again that DoM is slowly becoming everything he fought against in making this escape boat, and again get instantly banned for it.
✌🏻✌🏻✌🏻
Don't forget...
Come on, man. This wasn't even Rule 16... You just got back.
Comment Removed: Rule 2
He didn't even advocate, glorify, or endorse violence. He sarcastically made a comment about a potential outcome if something did happen.
You're now banning people based on sarcastic potentialities?
He's banning people because he can, because that got to his head and because there are no real world consequences to being an online playground bully.
Also I guess he ran out of dried foreskin to chew, so he's crankier than usual.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16: Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: That was actually pretty funny & ruthless!
He was already absolutely borderline by saying "come collect them".
"Come and Take Them" style posts are fine, but when you're pushing that you're capable of making "IRA style nail bombs" and "makeshift claymores" and that you will hide them, and should talk to loved ones, and that children will be happy you are gone... then you've done literally everything possible to insinuate that you intend to kill federal agents.
There's literally no other way to take that.
No he was not. That's YOUR interpretation of a vague statement that literally says NOTHING. It's an invitation, not a promotion, not advocating, nor an endorsement.
By the definition of YOUR OWN RULES his comment doesn't even satisfy the descriptors YOU laid out. This is your own ego getting in the way of your own rules. It makes me sick when people power trip like that.
Either follow the rules or throw them out altogether if you're going to bend them to suit your own tyrannical whims.
He insinuated that it's easy to make and hide bombs, not that he DID make and hide bombs or was going to use them.
Again, this is YOUR interpretation of his comments, which weren't even actually directed at an actual person, nor did they actually infer any actual violence would occur, nor actually promote an actual violent act, nor endorse any said act. The only way you could come to that conclusion is in the supposition that violence would occur, but nothing in his statements infers any actual violent act.
In fact, him saying the children will be happy they're gone could very well relate to any random accident occurring throughout the day, from falling over a banister to ending up in a car crash. YOU made the leap to connecting his comments directly to violence.
Yes there is, unless you're a completely brainwashed Lefty from Reddit.
But whatever, I'm wasting my time on you and Antonio and any other mod here. You guys can't be reasoned with, and you're too entrapped in Reddit culture and fear of people who hate you to stop being overreacting doormats to the people who forced everyone else into this containment thread.
You make me sick. But I'm sure you'll find solace in some backside kissers on Reddit who adore over-reaching censorship based on misinterpretations of vague comments.
This isn't a whim. He knew exactly what he was doing: insinuating that he would be happy to kill government agents should they come to his house, with the use of illegal weapons (booby traps).
Oh, come the fuck on. You're asking me to make a leap and assume that there's no possible way he could have said exactly what he said.
You're asking me to interpret his comments in the most unreasonably charitable way possible.
WRONG. YOU made the leap in the first place to attribute insinuations to actions he never outlined. YOU DID.
And you just revealed that you interpreted his actions to ban him based on things he didn't actually say that broke the rules.
You're killing your site.
People have also told me I'm killing the site by allowing the stuff I'm NOT banning.
I think the site is going to be okay.
People with sites think that, but once you're commonly recognized as a censorship site, the demographics begin to reflect that.
I suppose whether or not that's a good thing depends on the purpose of the site.
Faggot.
Yes.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
Comment Approved: This is okay because he's just saying he won't give them up. He's well under the line.
Based Banned gang represent.
I think .win moderation has been infiltrated by SJWs, as is their modus operandi when sites that disagree with them exist. They literally cant leave us alone, and will follow us to the ends of the earth (and the internet), until we stop them once and for all.
Both DoM and Antonio are Reddit mods, this place was infiltrated from day 1.
a.k.a. you can take the tranny janny off reddit, but you can't take the reddit out of the tranny janny.
Antonio isn't a mod here.
And? He hand picked DoM, everything he complains about DoM removes. He might as well be a mod.
16 rules is too many. there's no reason for half these rules. this is not reddit.
Nope, but it is also not stormfront, CHAZ, or the antifa protest. Replacng one cancer with another cancer is not a good idea.(identity politics sucks)
Imagine eating in a restaurant and an antifa person screams at you. What would you do?
He's the antifa tranny screaming at you. He deliberately comes into threads of people discussing ideas he doesn't like, spergs out, and then spergs out harder when he gets downvoted for being a retard. Then he'll try and shill his youtube channel in a self post. What a faggot
Alright then, why should I replace one identity politics blaming one race for everything wrong under the sun with another identity politics blaming the other race for everything under the sun?
The use of the word “conspiracy” in this rule functions to protect exactly one demographic.
Two, on the days theImpossible1 isn't banned.
Edit: every Amendment to the US Constitution after the 13th was a mistake.
Only the second amendment really matters, without it, the constitution is a worthless piece of paper.
The second amendment protects the entire constitution.
I can't tell if you're supporting me being banned or not.
The 19th Amendment granted universal suffrage, primarily relevant for women. With the exception of the first 10, which were adopted as a group, they were all added chronologically.
Draw your own conclusions.
They always do. Unless it's a topic very dear to your heart, you HAVE TO be a fundamentally worthless person with a superiority complex to be an internet mod. If you have any self-respect or productive value at all, you look at the dumpster fire and eventually decide that it's not worth your time - but not these people, they're addicted to that little bubble wherein they are powerful and have a say.
Banned squad represent
A post like this needs theme music.
We're crackin' a seal open. We need some fucking black metal!
Consume Product* is that way.
.
..
...
....
.....
......
.......
........
.........
..........
...........
*See you there
Either you absolutely love the subject, you're a petty tyrant or you're a paid shill. There really isn't anything besides those three that could stand wasting dozens of hours each week on curating an online forum.
Aaaaand he's gone again. Whoever he is. Honestly I don't know, you need more of a character to be remembered specifically, frankly.
I just got my comment deleted, even though it did not break any rules:
https://files.catbox.moe/8g62zt.png
I never once attacked anybody based on their identity.
Apparently I am not allowed to point out objective historical facts which are public knowledge and widely agreed upon.
I am also not allowed to point out the blatant human rights abuses done by Israel against Palestinians, even though I was simply responding to a question that Jester had asked.
It seems that Israel is above the law, and above criticism, they are the only country that is allowed to do extreme human rights abuses and yet nobody is allowed to talk about it.
No, you're allowed to make jokes about historical events, you just can't encourage mass murder, or claim that a demographic deserves one.
What if some of the shit you say is actually the degenerate drivel, though?
You can make all those jokes. They just have to actually be jokes, and they can't just be call to violence or a condemnation of a demographic.
Like, someone just said I ran out of dried foreskin to chew on, which is why I was so cranky. That's a joke/insult, and it's funny at that! But if you just say: "Jews just love eating baby dicks", that's more of an attack on that demographic.
Trannies are not allowed to say you should die... but none of them come here. Yesterday was the first time I had to remove someone for deriding Christians as inherently morally inferior, for example. I can't remove comments that don't get made.
I don't think this term necessarily means a group with ethnic or otherwise immutable ties. Like, gamers can be a demographic, or catholics.
The mod hat invites a degree of pedantry. Though I think it's a dangerous slope to be banning attacks on groups that chose their group, such as christians. If you think faith is an immutable characteristic, then that's another matter entirely.
Some meta comments while I'm here:
The inability to block terrible posters acts as a disincentive to participate. I've had to memorize more names because of this. Can we at least get the user tag system going here like we have on reddit?
I would prefer if bans and other moderator punishments weren't so discreet, as well. It's a different message for you to remove a post than it is for you to remove a post while enacting a punishment. In good faith support of the rules, punishment should be a public display. To hide the punishment is like an implication that the enforcement is not just.
I think it'd also help cool some heels if users had a better opportunity to rag on mods for the inevitable re-banning of local characters like theimpossible1 (he livens things up even if he's breaking the rules).
I believe you're looking for c/Conspiracies. I'm sure axolotl_peyotl welcomes those posts. Go there and be happy.