So is there actually a problem where women can't walk around in the UK? If there is I presume it's being raped by migrants.
It seems like they are constantly worried about women walking around, but I wonder if it's sort of like gun control narratives in the US where it's a few scattered incidents they make a big deal out of. So all these women think they are constantly in danger and call for "common sense man control."
No, quite the opposite. It's men that are at risk of being killed walking around, either by other men or increasingly likely by women.
The rate of women being murdered has declined in recent times, while the rate of female perpetrators has increased.
It is indeed, and they all have odd occurrences that don't make complete sense. The officer that killed Everard used to work for Parliamentary protection, her disappearance was news before it was known that anything happened, the dates line up with a Parliamentary review into "misogyny" laws, the leader of the movement that sprung up out of her "murder" was a young American feminist famous for calling for male genocide.
Oh and they just got clearance for a woman to do a review into whether the police are sexist, which is a bit like asking Nazis if Jewish power is a threat. Just skip wasting the people's money pretending to investigate and go straight to police "education in misogyny" classes and mandatory chief of women's issues positions at every police department.
The amount of shady circumstances around the Everard saga is mind-boggling.
The answer to "we feel unsafe" should be "We don't fucking care. Remember when you called for our deaths?"
I tend to lean more towards an approach to women that they should be generally housewives and secretaries. Yeah, it's a patriarchy--that's what most successful societies have been in history.
If they want to push this feminist society, then I don't have much more to say to them but they made their bed, now they have to lie in it.
It's men that are at risk of being killed walking around
I am pretty sure that rates of rape are much higher than those of murder. Especially as close to no one gets killed just 'walking around'.
The rate of women being murdered has declined in recent times, while the rate of female perpetrators has increased.
You always claim that such incidents are 'covered up' and that the statistics are totally fake. But now you cite the statistics as proof that the number is changing, which if you actually believed your own claims, would prove that they are covering up less.
It is indeed, and they all have odd occurrences that don't make complete sense.
Well, if you believe that there is a conspiracy among 51% of the population to literally murder you and all other men, I imagine that stuff that actually happens doesn't make a lot of sense to you.
Oh and they just got clearance for a woman to do a review into whether the police are sexist, which is a bit like asking Nazis if Jewish power is a threat.
Yes, Jews assaulted, killed and raped more Nazis than the other way around. Comparison makes total sense.
The answer to "we feel unsafe" should be "We don't fucking care. Remember when you called for our deaths?"
And the answer to that would be, which you'd know if you ever interacted with any female of the opposite sex, "What are you smoking? I never called for your death".
But it isn't. All of these people crying about "women's safety" backed this hatred against us and then will deny it.
How could you possibly substantiate that about all people concerned about women's safety, which is a very real concern due to their physical weakness.
The fact is, if they didn't back it, they wouldn't be crying about "male violence" like the Nazis they emulate cry about "Jewish influence."
So pointing out that men are responsible for the vast, vast majority of the violence is literally support for genocide. By that standard, 13/56 is also racist.
So is there actually a problem where women can't walk around in the UK? If there is I presume it's being raped by migrants.
It seems like they are constantly worried about women walking around, but I wonder if it's sort of like gun control narratives in the US where it's a few scattered incidents they make a big deal out of. So all these women think they are constantly in danger and call for "common sense man control."
No, quite the opposite. It's men that are at risk of being killed walking around, either by other men or increasingly likely by women.
The rate of women being murdered has declined in recent times, while the rate of female perpetrators has increased.
It is indeed, and they all have odd occurrences that don't make complete sense. The officer that killed Everard used to work for Parliamentary protection, her disappearance was news before it was known that anything happened, the dates line up with a Parliamentary review into "misogyny" laws, the leader of the movement that sprung up out of her "murder" was a young American feminist famous for calling for male genocide.
Oh and they just got clearance for a woman to do a review into whether the police are sexist, which is a bit like asking Nazis if Jewish power is a threat. Just skip wasting the people's money pretending to investigate and go straight to police "education in misogyny" classes and mandatory chief of women's issues positions at every police department.
The amount of shady circumstances around the Everard saga is mind-boggling.
The answer to "we feel unsafe" should be "We don't fucking care. Remember when you called for our deaths?"
I tend to lean more towards an approach to women that they should be generally housewives and secretaries. Yeah, it's a patriarchy--that's what most successful societies have been in history.
If they want to push this feminist society, then I don't have much more to say to them but they made their bed, now they have to lie in it.
I am pretty sure that rates of rape are much higher than those of murder. Especially as close to no one gets killed just 'walking around'.
You always claim that such incidents are 'covered up' and that the statistics are totally fake. But now you cite the statistics as proof that the number is changing, which if you actually believed your own claims, would prove that they are covering up less.
Well, if you believe that there is a conspiracy among 51% of the population to literally murder you and all other men, I imagine that stuff that actually happens doesn't make a lot of sense to you.
Yes, Jews assaulted, killed and raped more Nazis than the other way around. Comparison makes total sense.
And the answer to that would be, which you'd know if you ever interacted with any female of the opposite sex, "What are you smoking? I never called for your death".
My mother did what?
Not yours, the person who tweeted it.
Seriously? I thought it was your customary hyperbole.
No, she literally did. And now her son is a paid shill for women's "safety".
The only way they'd feel safe is if we got genocided. Why the fuck do people still listen to them?
The answer to "we feel unsafe" should be "We don't fucking care. Remember when you called for our deaths?"
Only SJW use 'genocide' as a verb.
Depends on who it is. If it's a rabid feminist shrew, womp womp. But this is a pretty dumb response if someone did not call for your death.,
That's a weird statement.
But it isn't. All of these people crying about "women's safety" backed this hatred against us and then will deny it.
The fact is, if they didn't back it, they wouldn't be crying about "male violence" like the Nazis they emulate cry about "Jewish influence."
Just something that I have noticed.
How could you possibly substantiate that about all people concerned about women's safety, which is a very real concern due to their physical weakness.
So pointing out that men are responsible for the vast, vast majority of the violence is literally support for genocide. By that standard, 13/56 is also racist.
Because it always goes hand in hand with their hatred?
How many of those men were raised by single mothers?
Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Post Removed:
You basically admitted to it.