Comments (28)
sorted by:
11
DontDoxMeBreaux 11 points ago +11 / -0

It cut out massive exploitative aspects, giving girls the majority of the money

Aren't female porn stars paid several times as much as their male coworkers?

choice of what they upload

Is the insinuation here that female porn stars have no say in what is uploaded? If you don't want something you starred in uploaded...don't star in it. You're not forced to.

8
current_horror 8 points ago +9 / -1

The insinuation is that women have no agency or accountability. So if they upload their tits to OF and it goes "the way it should" - piles of money and attention - then things are working correctly. If it goes "the way it shouldn't" - very little money, lots of embarrassment, unwanted attention - then things are working incorrectly and must be changed.

6
TheImpossible1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Shh, don't notice things, incel. Just allow us to make $50k+ exploiting our victims."

-4
AntonioOfVenice -4 points ago +3 / -7

Coomers are not victims.

8
TheImpossible1 [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

So you think the feminized school system crushing their self-worth has nothing to do with it?

-4
AntonioOfVenice -4 points ago +1 / -5

I think your melodramatic nonsense does nothing to make them victims, no. If there's any victim, it's the girls who whore themselves out because it was taught to them that this is good or acceptable.

By the way, GC agrees with you that OnlyFans is very bad.

7
TheImpossible1 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Melodramatic? What else explains what's happening other than a systematic campaign to crush the self worth of boys to profit when they become men?

Yeah, they're definitely victims. I'd love to be a victim of those 5, 6 and sometimes 7 or higher figures in my bank account for doing nothing.

GC also agrees the sky is blue. What's your point. Their reasoning is far different to my own, they think the piece of shit exploiters are the victims.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
TheImpossible1 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

They make way more than $2k.

1
raven0ak 1 point ago +1 / -0

then again, most female in porn are for male audience, males in porn are for effect, not for view pleasure...and most targeting of porn is to male audience

11
JiggsawCalrissian 11 points ago +11 / -0

I wouldn't necessarily go as far as to say she is controlled opposition. I think it's the default "sisters are doing it for themselves" hard system override that all women have.

7
TheImpossible1 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

I disagree. I thought she was a feminist plant when she started as the tradthot anti-feminist. I thought she was a feminist plant when she started whining about immigrants while women were trying to seize power everywhere. I still think she's a feminist plant and I think this proves me right.

8
ThatsAlright 8 points ago +8 / -0

She's a lib, always has been. Muh illegal immigrants is largely popular on the right.

4
current_horror 4 points ago +5 / -1

The tradthot is a liar and a grifter, and Lauren is both of those. She humped her way through half the industry.

They are a minority at this point, for sure, but there are women out there who don't fuck every dude who looks good in a t-shirt.

3
lgbtqwtfbbq 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not sure she was a "plant"; I think she's just a 90s-00s era Canadian feminist that was popular with a lot of 90s-00s era liberals. We had and still have a lot of those people in these quarters of the internet who simply wish that era was the "end of history"

2
JiggsawCalrissian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well sir, I'm willing to view her with more scrutiny as a result of this so it's fine

5
The247 5 points ago +5 / -0

She simply and directly is Jewish.

5
TheImpossible1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://archive.is/HkTAO

The internet never forgets.

Even JPMorgan and BNY Mellon have more morals than you. The OnlyFans pushers will have to one day face justice for what they did to kids to make this racket work.

-4
AntonioOfVenice -4 points ago +1 / -5

Even JPMorgan and BNY Mellon have more morals than you.

Imagine thinking that JPMorgan has morals.

The OnlyFans pushers will have to one day face justice for what they did to kids to make this racket work.

Let me guess, Nuremberg trials for people who say that OnlyFans is good where they will be executed?

6
TheImpossible1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Apparently, it has more than women do. They actually cut off OnlyFans from payments.

Have to make the punishment fit the crime. Asset strip + 5y in prison.

We'll need a lot more women's prisons if we are to get justice for the kids they targeted.

-4
AntonioOfVenice -4 points ago +1 / -5

Apparently, it has more than women do. They actually cut off OnlyFans from payments.

If someone else reasoned in your feminist manner, he would say that the male bankers at JPMorgan tried to shut down OF in order to help male pornographers confiscate more of the value created by female porn stars.

Have to make the punishment fit the crime. Asset strip + 5y in prison.

You get mad when your precious coomers voluntarily give over their money to ugly thots, but want to steal the belongings of Lauren Southern for not liking OnlyFans while acknowledging its positive side?

She's not wrong by the way.

We'll need a lot more women's prisons if we are to get justice for the kids they targeted.

You see, your great folly (quite apart from your lunatic program) is that one never announces what one is going to do beforehand, or one will never be in a position to do so.

6
TheImpossible1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

The difference being of course that JPM has never done anything good for men and backs feminist doctrine in every other facet of society. They just didn't want to be involved when this whole house of cards comes down and the system is revealed.

Asset stripping is not stealing. And she is wrong. The porn industry isn't exploitative. That's just the same logic that was debunked in the 1980s when the fucking radfems used it. What's exploitative and rather obviously so is what they're doing to make OF work.

I know I will never be in a position to do so. There's too much dirt on me for me to be the savior of this world from their evil plan. As cringey as it sounds, only someone pure and kindhearted (really does sound like a fairytale plot) would have a hope in hell of stopping them. Anyone with even a modicum of dirt on them will have it projected to the world. They'll pay your old acquaintances to say you're insane, your old girlfriends to say you're abusive etc.

2
Tourgen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just a feminist youtube grifter. Anyone believing otherwise is kind of a dumb person.

1
TheImpossible1 [S] 1 point ago +4 / -3

I'm sure it is an improvement, you fucking waste of space. Anything that helps your kind exploit people is.

Are you planning on creating an account and taking part in the mass exploitation of the boys that went through women's system who are now grown up?

-8
AntonioOfVenice -8 points ago +1 / -9

I am pretty sure that you are controlled opposition, or actually a 26-year-old feminist who tries to discredit critics of feminism by spewing the most unhinged crap imaginable and repeatedly making false predictions.

5
TheImpossible1 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Jill wanted to go full Australia" - Jack Posobiec.

-5
AntonioOfVenice -5 points ago +1 / -6

Why didn't you quote the first part of what he said, if you believe it?

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1436084333274673154

6
TheImpossible1 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because it's not relevant?

If it's Jill not Kamala, I'm still right.