As you may know there have been a variety of background for mass shooters.
A woman shot up google headquarters when youtube demonetized her videos:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/apr/04/nasim-najafi-aghdam-youtube-shooting-demonetisation-payments-father
A trans person shot up their school:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-colorado-shooting/transgender-teen-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-deadly-colorado-school-shooting-idUSKCN24Q00D
And there's so many mass shootings in gangland in chicago you can't even list them all out.
But the press likes to push only the ones that meet their man-hating narrative - when the shooter is a white man - like recently:
https://archive.ph/hSkPM
Apparently this is his reddit post history:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210813174435/https://old.reddit.com/user/Jake3572
**Of the last 24 posts he made - 12 of them were to one of reddits protected man-bashing hate subs - **IncelsInAction.
The sub description of itself:
This sub is for mocking the antics of anyone who identifies themselves as "incel." This is a term popularised on Reddit and 4chan meaning "involuntarily celibate" i.e. men who can't get laid. Some of them get really really mad about it, and here are their stories...
...
Incels who comment in here can expect to be relentlessly mocked by this community. If you don't like it, don't post here.
Did reddit's protection of it's anti-male subs contribute to this shooting?
It seems a lot more plausible than the banned "men going their own way" sub.
Huh, they started ruthlessly calling him a pedo.
Guy is from the United Femdom. 16 is 100% legal, even if you're triple or even quadruple their age.
So, what I'm starting to see is a weird pattern. I wonder if any MI5 types were in his messages?
Incels try their best to act nice despite their anger, but vent in their own communities.
Women go out of their way to attack these people and dehumanize them, in the hope they either kill themselves or give a propaganda victory by snapping and killing people.
I mean, they still to this day mention Elliot fucking Rodger and he killed more men than women.
I need to make a post that can be pushed to these people.
Violence isn't the answer.
You can't force them to submit to your demands for human rights by threats. When you are already a group that is dehumanized as a threat to humanity, you can't play into that narrative.
You can't give them what they want because they will use it to punish everyone who shares your label and everyone who challenges their "superiority". Their victimhood and their dehumanization is what gives them power.
All you're doing by violence is giving their Der Sturmer-esque media more power to dehumanize you and make the average person believe their lies about you.
Legality is not morality, or you would have to approve of screwing 9-year-old girls in Yemen.
When? All I see is "women are whores who deserve to be raped because they don't appreciate me not showering enough".
Anyone who defines himself by his inability to get laid is not human to begin with.
Yes, it is, but legitimate violence by the appropriate authorities. In the hypothetical case of violence by an individual, which no one should, he will do more harm than good for his own cause if he kills random people, rather than malefactors. Which, as I said, no one should.
Is that all you see, because it sounds more like multiple of the most extreme individual views from an entire group conglomerated into a single sentence that doesn't actually represent the beliefs of any of them, let alone the group as a whole
I don't visit their subs, and I am pretty sure they are not longer expressing such sentiments as it will get them banned immediately by Reddit.
But they are a bunch of mental cases. My problem isn't even with their 'misogyny', as their belief that they are entitled to others' bodies is no different from Trancels and Fatcels. It's that they are so brainwashed by pop culture that they define their own self-worth, which is no doubt quite insignificant, as being wholly about whether they can get laid.
It borders on being a cultural norm that someone reaches a point in their life where they realize they're not dating and they need to do something about it. I've known multiple girls who reached this point, and of course some guys as well including myself.
The movie Back To The Future has something like this as it's background plot.
In Marty's original timeline his parents are low self esteem and kinda losers. He has to sneak around to spend the weekend with his girlfriend. It's very relatable for a lot of people - their parents, their school, etc tsk tsk at relations with the opposite gender but the successful people do it anyways.
Uh...this seems to be confused with the anti-incel idealogy. This is what incel-mocking cells believe, it's about feeling that men who can't get laid are worthless and if you are getting laid you're superior to them.
I don't think this is the philosophy of incel subs. I didn't spend much time in them because they seemed to me to mostly about training men to stop caring about whether they were getting laid or not in some weird thing about removing their sex drive as a way to control them.