Pornography literacy classes
(twitter.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
"When a deluded pervert under the guise of 'educator' showed a bunch of 6 year olds porn, parents were angry about it for some reason". This kind of headline reminds me of when female rapists are described using "had sex with" their victims in headlines.
Coming with a handy MORE TWEETS suggestion from twitter dot com:
A masterclass in creating a problem and then "solving" it while actually making it worse so you can later repeat this cycle. I mean obviously what we need is lifelong public education- this people get out of school and start picking up problematic ideas.
Because 12 years of compulsory propaganda still isn't enough to silence those pesky patriots.
This is actually not bad.
You would have the same effect by letting people actually fail and need to redo grade or high school.
It'll just turn into two more years of dumbed down high school. If you want people more educated those who are capable should be given accelerated instruction in high school, but we are moving in the exact opposite direction. You'll have people coming out of the public education system at 20 just as poorly educated as they are now.
yes it is. why do you want more people going to the faggot factory?
Note how the photo is carefully crafted to make her look heroic.
Note how the article glosses over the 1st grader issue and quickly frames this as being about teaching sex ed to pubescent teenagers:
Anyone with an ounce of critical thinking should see right through this. But they won't, not because they lack the ability, but because it's The New York Times and they've been programmed to believe unquestioningly.
Note how carefully the headline avoids saying "This LGBT+MAP shows porn to 6 year olds then teaches them to masturbate."
The headline goes "oh, it's a mystery, what could it possibly be that was objectionable conduct? Was it maybe the thing that if a guy did the exact same action he would be in prison for decades? Who knows? The world is a mystery! I don't even speak English, these words being typed are random and pure coincidence!"
The fact they don't outline it shows they're in support of it. NYT are pedos, or at the least defenders of active, crime-committing pedos.
It has a nosering.
they do this shit all the time: 1. do something obviously deviant for the purpose of getting attention 2. normal people respond like normal people respond to deviance 3. the deviant feigns ignorance "whats the big deal" and "why are you obsessed with (thing I just did)"
I can't remember who researched it, but someone moderately famous on the right looked into the mainstream claim that teen pregnancy dropped after schools began teaching sex ed in schools (in the 70s I think?). They thoroughly researched it, and found that it was the opposite, and teen pregnancy and STDs climbed every year since it's implementation in schools. Sex ed has been a lie from the beginning, meant to pervert out children into the sexual degeneracy that the string pullers are a part of, and using it as a means to control people.
Straight up illegal.
Yet another case of leftists being above the law.
Not that a class on improving porno wouldn't be welcome, but I wouldn't pay money for one of these things.
"...And that's why, pornography is actually sex-positive."
"That's nice, I ordered a Mcflurry."