The major focus looks to be about abortion on demand and contraceptives and pads for girls. Although no one proved it is an issue in the first place.
Parliament encourages member states to ensure sexuality education is taught comprehensively to primary and secondary school children, as SRHR education can significantly contribute to reducing sexual violence and harassment.
This part needs explanation cause I do not understand how abortion services decrease infant mortality
safe abortion services are important elements in saving women’s lives and reducing infant and child mortality.
They consider a fetus to be an inhuman clump of cells, more akin to a tumor, so excising it before it becomes an "infant" reduces infant mortality. Kind of an old language trick to justify murder.
Nature does not communicate itself through language; it uses movement to inspire our senses. Languages represent the suggested definitions of those within nature; which when consented to (by believing their suggestions) gives them the authority to define nature.
Fuck off tranny.
Nice; that's an insult seldom heard. Let's see...trans from either transfer (exchange; change) or transe (ecstasy), and sex (distinction between male and female aka natural opposites).
Exchange is either flow to form (need) or form to form (want in ignorance of need), ecstasy (trance; to stand affixed) represents the temptation of ignorance (want over need), and sex implies balance between opposites; hence choice between need and want. Interesting.
What are the implications of choosing to put these two words together?
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
How am I supposed to tell?
All he's done here is say "fuck trannies" in a convoluted way.
Nature has a language, it’s called genetics. Human language suggests definitions based off of categorization and rationalization, this prescribed language creates understanding. But genetics creates variances which we have to keep updating and categorizing as we learn the variations.
The genetic; from genesis (origin) of form represents flow, and the origin of flow/form represents energy aka the source of ALL information; communicated as flow to the form (ONE) within.
Suggestion requires consent by free will of choice (ONEs sole authority over self within ALL) and consent to the suggestions made by another ONE represents ONEs choice to ignore ALL.
Flow demands adaptation from form (our choice of need); while ignoring this for the suggestions of other form represents our chocie of want. Need (self sustenance of life); want (temptation luring towards death).
ALL (flow) represents predefined information; the ONEs (form) within cannot create new information; only transmute out of ALL perceived. Flow also represents the natural order upon form; it categorized us into ONE (potential) within ALL (potentiality).
Rational aka reason represents the conflict between truth and false; a fictitious conflict; caused by consent to believe that a suggested -ism is true/false; which then causes the conflict between those who believe true/false and those who don't believe it. For those who made the suggestion this represents control through division by suggestion.
Instead of reason (true vs false) utilize implication (if/then); which is in adherence to use being form within flow. it adheres to natural law (as defined by flow upon form) and is also taught in the so called talmud; which also uses talmudic reasoning to maintain the conflicts of reason through suggested contradictions (to both sides). All division by suggestion devices for mass population control.
Perception represents the input of inspiration; free will of choice between adherence to it (adaptation) and ignorance thereof (temptation) represents the transmutation of perceived inspiration into comprehended information aka from ALL perceived potentiality into ONEs comprehended potential.
Believing the suggested information by other ONEs (temptation) prevents ONEs growth of potential; because ONE represents a vessel of ALL and can only growth through choice based adherence to ALL. This is where the parasites operate as the happy merchants of temptations offering us endless suggestions.
Believing language only deceives us to perceive reality through the lens of words; defined by the free will of others. Branding form within flow tricks us to ignore being form within flow; in need of adaptation by choice of action to flow.
a) flow segregates ALL potentiality into individual ONE potential (form) as inspiration for the sustenance of form within flow. If everything would be the same; why would ONE struggle to sustain self within flow? b) adherence to the segregation of differences allows unity of potential (form) to recharge the loss of potentiality (flow). The parasite utilize division (reason) while mixing us together to destroy differences; which decreases perceived inspiration; which in return keeps the many ignorant and the few in control.
ONEs update represents adherence to perceived inspiration aka the choice of need (self sustenance) over want (ignorance); which builds comprehension (potential).
It's ALL predefined; the ONEs within lack comprehension, and trying to brand temporary form within ongoing flow is just ignorance towards self sustenance. Form cannot accumulate information without flow destroying it. We cannot unlock nature; each ONE of us needs to build his own comprehension, and the suggested information of others corrupts that into lack of comprehension.
Another suggested parasite inversion...we are tricked to consent to learn what others teach; yet under natural law to learn/teach represents the same action when applied to the sustenance of self...to teach self equals to learn for self and vice versa.
This guy is high as shit
I still haven't figured out whether he's some kind of chatbot
hilarious if he is, kinda sad if he isn't
It's funny tho, seeing an NPC with a name like, "free will of choice."
I'm about 50% certain it's a chatbot, but the odd thing is its replies aren't instant. You'd think a chatbot would have instantaneous replies. On the other hand, I don't think I've ever seen it NOT reply to someone eventually, which would be the behavior of a bot, auto-replying and always getting the last word, but some people are like that too.
Its replies use wordplay on occasion, but at the same time exhibit zero knowledge of how language actually works on the general case.
a) no substance abuse on my end, and b) "high as shit"? Where do you think you got that figure of speech from, and what was there intent for suggesting it to you?